Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 476-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürg Müller ◽  
Judith A Kassis
Keyword(s):  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Group Proteins ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements

scholarly journals Recruitment of components of Polycomb Group chromatin complexes in Drosophila

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Poux ◽  
D. McCabe ◽  
V. Pirrotta
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Imaginal Discs ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
Polycomb Group Complexes ◽  
State Of Activity

Polycomb Group complexes assemble at polycomb response elements (PREs) in vivo and silence genes in the surrounding chromatin. To study the recruitment of silencing complexes, we have targeted various Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins by fusing them to the LexA DNA binding domain. When LexA-PC, -PSC, -PH or -SU(Z)2 are targeted to a reporter gene, they recruit functional PcG-silencing complexes that recapitulate the silencing behavior of a PRE: silencing is sensitive to the state of activity of the target chromatin. When the target is transcriptionally active, silencing is not established but when the target is not active at syncytial blastoderm, it becomes silenced. The repressed state persists through embryonic development but cannot be maintained in larval imaginal discs even when the LexA-PcG fusion is constitutively expressed, suggesting a discontinuity in the mechanism of repression. These proteins also interact with other PC-containing complexes in embryonic nuclear extracts. In contrast LexA-PHO is neither able to silence nor to interact with PC-containing complexes. Analysis of pho mutant embryos and of PRE constructs whose PHO-binding sites are mutated suggests that, while PHO is important for silencing in imaginal discs, it is not necessary for embryonic PcG silencing.

TheDrosophilaTrithorax protein is a coactivator required to prevent re-establishment of Polycomb silencing

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (10) ◽  
pp. 2483-2493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Poux ◽  
Béatrice Horard ◽  
Christian J. A. Sigrist ◽  
Vincenzo Pirrotta
Keyword(s):  
Imaginal Discs ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Active State ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Epigenetic Memory ◽  
Gaga Factor ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Active Gene ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements

Polycomb group (PcG) and Trithorax (TRX) complexes assemble at Polycomb response elements (PREs) and maintain respectively the repressed and active state of homeotic genes. Although PcG and TRX complexes are distinct, their binding to some PRE fragments in vitro depends on GAGA motifs. GAGA factor immunoprecipitates with both complexes. In presence of a PRE, TRX stimulates expression and prevents the return of repression at later stages. When TRX levels are reduced, repression is re-established in inappropriate regions of imaginal discs, suggesting that TRX insufficiency impairs the epigenetic memory of the active state. Targeting a GAL-TRX fusion shows that TRX is a coactivator that stimulates expression of an active gene but cannot initiate expression by itself. Targeting a histone acetylase to a PRE does not affect embryonic silencing but causes a loss of memory in imaginal discs, suggesting that deacetylation is required to establish the memory of the repressed state.

scholarly journals The Mcp Element From the Drosophila melanogaster Bithorax Complex Mediates Long-Distance Regulatory Interactions

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 1333-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Muller ◽  
Kirsten Hagstrom ◽  
Henrik Gyurkovics ◽  
Vincenzo Pirrotta ◽  
Paul Schedl
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Small Fragment ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Homolog Pairing ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
Trans Regulation

Abstract In the studies reported here, we have examined the properties of the Mcp element from the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax complex (BX-C). We have found that sequences from the Mcp region of BX-C have properties characteristic of Polycomb response elements (PREs), and that they silence adjacent reporters by a mechanism that requires trans-interactions between two copies of the transgene. However, Mcp trans-regulatory interactions have several novel features. In contrast to classical transvection, homolog pairing does not seem to be required. Thus, trans-regulatory interactions can be observed not only between Mcp transgenes inserted at the same site, but also between Mcp transgenes inserted at distant sites on the same chromosomal arm, or even on different arms. Trans-regulation can even be observed between transgenes inserted on different chromosomes. A small 800-bp Mcp sequence is sufficient to mediate these long-distance trans-regulatory interactions. This small fragment has little silencing activity on its own and must be combined with other Polycomb-Group-responsive elements to function as a “pairing-sensitive” silencer. Finally, this pairing element can also mediate long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters, activating mini-white expression.

scholarly journals Genome-wide Prediction of Potential Polycomb Response Elements and their Functions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Khabiri ◽  
Peter L. Freddolino
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Entire Genome ◽  
Trithorax Group ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
Trithorax Group Proteins

AbstractThe Polycomb-group proteins (PcG) and Trithorax-group proteins (TrxG) are two major epigenetic regulators important for proper differentiation during development (1, 2). In Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster), Polycomb response elements (PREs) are short segments of DNA with a high density of binding sites for transcription factors (TFs) that recruit PcG and TrxG proteins to chromatin. Each PRE has a different number of binding sites for PcG and TrxG, and these binding sites have different topological organizations. It is thus difficult to find general rules to discover the locations of PREs over the entire genome. We have developed a framework to predict the locations and roles of potential PRE regions over the entire D. melanogaster genome using machine learning algorithms. Using a combination of motif-based and simple sequence-based features, we were able to train a random forest (RF) model with very high performance in predicting active PRE regions. This model could distinguish potential PRE regions from non-PRE regions (precision and recall ~0.92 upon cross-validation). In the process, the model suggests that previously unrecognized TFs might contribute to PcG/TrxG recruitment at the PRE locations, as the presence of binding sites for those factors is strongly informative of active PREs. A secondary regression model provides information on features that further differentiate PREs into functional subclasses. Our findings provide both new predictions of 7887 potential PREs in the D. melanogaster genome, and new mechanistic insight into the set of DNA-associated proteins that may contribute to PcG recruitment and/or activity.

Role of Transcriptional Read-Through in PRE Activity in Drosophila melanogaster

Acta Naturae ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. V. Elizar’ev ◽  
D. V. Lomaev ◽  
D. A. Chetverina ◽  
P. G. Georgiev ◽  
M. M. Erokhin
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Transcription Terminator ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Multicellular Organisms ◽  
Different Cell Types ◽  
Main Factor

Maintenance of the individual patterns of gene expression in different cell types is required for the differentiation and development of multicellular organisms. Expression of many genes is controlled by Polycomb (PcG) and Trithorax (TrxG) group proteins that act through association with chromatin. PcG/TrxG are assembled on the DNA sequences termed PREs (Polycomb Response Elements), the activity of which can be modulated and switched from repression to activation. In this study, we analyzed the influence of transcriptional read-through on PRE activity switch mediated by the yeast activator GAL4. We show that a transcription terminator inserted between the promoter and PRE doesnt prevent switching of PRE activity from repression to activation. We demonstrate that, independently of PRE orientation, high levels of transcription fail to dislodge PcG/TrxG proteins from PRE in the absence of a terminator. Thus, transcription is not the main factor required for PRE activity switch.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document