scholarly journals Best social and organizational practices of successful science gateways and cyberinfrastructure projects

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 795-801
Author(s):  
Kerk F. Kee ◽  
Andrew R. Schrock
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Madhavan ◽  
Lynn Zentner ◽  
Victoria Farnsworth ◽  
Swaroop Shivarajapura ◽  
Michael Zentner ◽  
...  

AbstractnanoHUB.org is arguably one of the most successful science gateways funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). It is the cyberinfrastructure that supports the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN), currently serving over 240,000 users annually in 172 countries worldwide. It features a range of resources including seminars, online courses, short courses, full-fledged tool-powered curricula, and over 260 online simulations and modeling tools. nanoHUB functions as a scientific cloud where users cannot only design and run their tools but also provide a worldwide audience access to these tools with no installation or minimal infrastructural requirements on the users’ part.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. A. Da Silva ◽  
M. J. Dos Santos Oliveira ◽  
H. M. B. Carvalho ◽  
M. C. R. Jacinto ◽  
T. C. Fialho ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Crouch ◽  
Luciano Berardi ◽  
Terrinieka Williams ◽  
Sangeeta Parikshak ◽  
Susan McMahon ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alayne J. Ormerod ◽  
Christopher D. Nye ◽  
Sadie E. Larsen ◽  
Julia E. Siebert

Author(s):  
Jun Zhou ◽  
Karen Smith ◽  
Greg Wilsbacher ◽  
Paul Sagona ◽  
David Reddy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marisa Salanova ◽  
Hedy Acosta Antognoni ◽  
Susana Llorens ◽  
Pascale Le Blanc

This study tests organizational trust as the psychosocial mechanism that explains how healthy organizational practices and team resources predict multilevel performance in organizations and teams, respectively. In our methodology, we collect data in a sample of 890 employees from 177 teams and their immediate supervisors from 31 Spanish companies. Our results from the multilevel analysis show two independent processes predicting organizational performance (return on assets, ROA) and performance ratings by immediate supervisors, operating at the organizational and team levels, respectively. We have found evidence for a theoretical and functional quasi-isomorphism. First, based on social exchange theory, we found evidence for our prediction that when organizations implement healthy practices and teams provide resources, employees trust their top managers (vertical trust) and coworkers (horizontal trust) and try to reciprocate these benefits by improving their performance. Second, (relationships among) constructs are similar at different levels of analysis, which may inform HRM officers and managers about which type of practices and resources can help to enhance trust and improve performance in organizations. The present study contributes to the scarce research on the role of trust at collective (i.e., organizational and team) levels as a psychological mechanism that explains how organizational practices and team resources are linked to organizational performance.


2020 ◽  
pp. 017084062091095
Author(s):  
Jesper Edman ◽  
Alex Makarevich

We examine the effect of status entrenchment on the adoption of new norm-deviant organizational practices. Identifying organizational age and status mobility as factors affecting entrenchment, we extend the middle-status conformity theory by explicating how entrenchment moderates the relationship between status and adoption. Using original data from the Japanese loan syndication market, we show that young and new-in-status banks have a lower propensity to follow status-based adoption behavior than actors entrenched in the same status positions. We discuss implication of these results for the understanding of new practice adoption and organizational status effects.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Rathi ◽  
Lisa M. Given ◽  
Eric Forcier

Purpose – This paper aims to present findings from a study of non-profit organizations (NPOs), including a model of knowledge needs that can be applied by practitioners and scholars to further develop the NPO sector. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted with NPOs operating in Canada and Australia. An analysis of survey responses identified the different types of knowledge essential for each organization. Respondents identified the importance of three pre-determined themes (quantitative data) related to knowledge needs, as well as a fourth option, which was a free text box (qualitative data). The quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analyses and a grounded theory approach, respectively. Findings – Analysis of the quantitative data indicates that NPOs ' needs are comparable in both countries. Analysis of qualitative data identified five major categories and multiple sub-categories representing the types of knowledge needs of NPOs. Major categories are knowledge about management and organizational practices, knowledge about resources, community knowledge, sectoral knowledge and situated knowledge. The paper discusses the results using semantic proximity and presents an emergent, evidence-based knowledge management (KM)-NPO model. Originality/value – The findings contribute to the growing body of literature in the KM domain, and in the understudied research domain related to the knowledge needs and experiences of NPOs. NPOs will find the identified categories and sub-categories useful to undertake KM initiatives within their individual organizations. The study is also unique, as it includes data from two countries, Canada and Australia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document