scholarly journals Comparing Robust Decision-Making and Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty

2016 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 168-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan H. Kwakkel ◽  
Marjolijn Haasnoot ◽  
Warren E. Walker
2010 ◽  
pp. 1071-1083
Author(s):  
Manual Mora ◽  
Ovsei Gelman ◽  
Guisseppi Forgionne ◽  
Francisco Cervantes

This article reviews the literature-based issues involved in implementing large-scale decision-making support systems (DMSSs). Unlike previous studies, this review studies holistically three types of DMSSs (model-based decision support systems, executive-oriented decision support systems, and knowledge-based decision support systems) and incorporates recent studies on the simulation of the implementations process. Such an article contributes to the literature by organizing the fragmented knowledge on the DMSS implementation phenomenon and by communicating the factors and stages involved in successful or failed large-scale DMSS implementations to practitioners.


2013 ◽  
Vol 321-324 ◽  
pp. 2357-2360
Author(s):  
Zhi Dan Wu

This paper gives a new model of decision support system based on knowledge management and web technology. Firstly,we analysis the existing problem of the efficiency and expandability of the current system.Then, we study the knowledge management and the B/S model based on web technology.Based on this, a new model of decision support system is presented in this paper. The system is designed in four layers structure and on three library.Finally, the paper describes the structure of the system and gives the detailed steps of decision-making process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. S193-S196 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Duranova ◽  
E. van Asselt ◽  
T. Müller ◽  
J. Bohunova ◽  
C.J.W. Twenhöfel ◽  
...  

Within the CONFIDENCE project, comprehensive methods have been developed for better support of decision making under uncertain conditions, mainly by use of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). While MCDA in general was available for use in the radiological crisis management community, no method of analysing uncertain conditions and supporting robust decision making under these conditions was available. During the CONFIDENCE project, the existing MCDA tool was improved and enhanced to deal with these requirements. For providing solid and reliable decision support for such a situation as a radiological emergency, the evaluation of decision-support tools by the stakeholders and their feedback is important, especially when considering their heterogeneous background caused by e.g. living in different countries. Therefore, several stakeholder panels in different countries were organized to include the end users’ opinions and to assure the usability of the final tool.


Author(s):  
Manual Mora ◽  
Ovsei Gelman ◽  
Guisseppi Forgionne ◽  
Francisco Cervantes

This article reviews the literature-based issues involved in implementing large-scale decision-making support systems (DMSSs). Unlike previous studies, this review studies holistically three types of DMSSs (model-based decision support systems, executive-oriented decision support systems, and knowledge-based decision support systems) and incorporates recent studies on the simulation of the implementations process. Such an article contributes to the literature by organizing the fragmented knowledge on the DMSS implementation phenomenon and by communicating the factors and stages involved in successful or failed large-scale DMSS implementations to practitioners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document