scholarly journals Coupling the short-term global forecast system weather data with a variable source area hydrologic model

2016 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 68-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Sommerlot ◽  
Moges B. Wagena ◽  
Daniel R. Fuka ◽  
Zachary M. Easton
1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane R. Frankenberger ◽  
Erin S. Brooks ◽  
M. Todd Walter ◽  
Michael F. Walter ◽  
Tammo S. Steenhuis

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Woodbury ◽  
Christine A. Shoemaker ◽  
Zachary M. Easton ◽  
Dillon M. Cowan

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W Feyereisen ◽  
Timothy C Strickland ◽  
Joseph M Sheridan

Ecohydrology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen E. Dahlke ◽  
Zachary M. Easton ◽  
Daniel R. Fuka ◽  
Steve W. Lyon ◽  
Tammo S. Steenhuis

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1173-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Charles ◽  
Brian A. Colle

Abstract This paper verifies extratropical cyclones around North America and the adjacent oceans within the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) and North American Mesoscale (NAM) models during the 2002–07 cool seasons (October–March). The analyzed cyclones in the Global Forecast System (GFS) model, North American Mesoscale (NAM) model, and the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) were also compared against sea level pressure (SLP) observations around extratropical cyclones. The GFS analysis of SLP was clearly superior to the NAM and NARR analyses. The analyzed cyclone pressures in the NAM improved in 2006–07 when its data assimilation was switched to the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI). The NCEP GFS has more skillful cyclone intensity and position forecasts than the NAM over the continental United States and adjacent oceans, especially over the eastern Pacific, where the NAM has a large positive (underdeepening) bias in cyclone central pressure. For the short-term (0–60 h) forecasts, the GFS and NAM cyclone errors over the eastern Pacific are larger than the other regions to the east. There are relatively large biases in cyclone position for both models, which vary spatially around North America. The eastern Pacific has four to eight cyclone events per year on average, with errors >10 mb at hour 48 in the GFS; this number has not decreased in recent years. There has been little improvement in the 0–2-day cyclone forecasts during the past 5 yr over the eastern United States, while there has been a relatively large improvement in the cyclone pressure predictions over the eastern Pacific in the NAM.


2012 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen E. Dahlke ◽  
Zachary M. Easton ◽  
M. Todd Walter ◽  
Tammo S. Steenhuis

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (25) ◽  
pp. 3420-3430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot M. Schneiderman ◽  
Tammo S. Steenhuis ◽  
Dominique J. Thongs ◽  
Zachary M. Easton ◽  
Mark S. Zion ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document