Experimentally nonylphenol-polluted diet induces the expression of silent genes VTG and ERα in the liver of male lizard Podarcis sicula

2011 ◽  
Vol 159 (5) ◽  
pp. 1101-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariailaria Verderame ◽  
Marina Prisco ◽  
Piero Andreuccetti ◽  
Francesco Aniello ◽  
Ermelinda Limatola
Keyword(s):  
Podarcis Sicula ◽  
Male Lizard ◽  
Silent Genes

The VIP/VPACR system in the reproductive cycle of male lizard Podarcis sicula

2014 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa Agnese ◽  
Luigi Rosati ◽  
Marina Prisco ◽  
Francesca Coraggio ◽  
Salvatore Valiante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Cycle ◽  
Podarcis Sicula ◽  
Male Lizard

Is Corticosterone Involved in the Reproductive Processes of the Male Lizard, Podarcis sicula sicula?

1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clotilde Manzo ◽  
Massimo Zerani ◽  
Anna Gobbetti ◽  
Maria Maddalena Di Fiore ◽  
Francesco Angelini
Keyword(s):  
Podarcis Sicula ◽  
Male Lizard ◽  
Reproductive Processes

Thyroid Hormones as Potential Early Biomarkers of Exposure to Nonylphenol in Adult Male Lizard (Podarcis sicula)~!2009-10-05~!2010-02-25~!2010-05-17~!

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosaria Sciarrillo ◽  
Anna Capaldo ◽  
Salvatore Valiante ◽  
Flaminia Gay ◽  
Anna Sellitti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormones ◽  
Adult Male ◽  
Podarcis Sicula ◽  
Early Biomarkers ◽  
Biomarkers Of Exposure ◽  
Male Lizard

PACAP and PAC1 receptor in the reproductive cycle of male lizard Podarcis sicula

2014 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Rosati ◽  
Marina Prisco ◽  
Francesca Coraggio ◽  
Salvatore Valiante ◽  
Rosaria Scudiero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Cycle ◽  
Pac1 Receptor ◽  
Podarcis Sicula ◽  
Male Lizard

Prostaglandins and reproduction in male lizard,Podarcis sicula sicula

1994 ◽  
Vol 268 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gobbetti ◽  
Massimo Zerani ◽  
Maria Maddalena di Fiore
Keyword(s):  
Podarcis Sicula ◽  
Male Lizard

Cadmium in Podarcis sicula Disrupts Prefollicular Oocyte Recruitment by Mimicking FSH Action~!2009-10-06~!2010-01-27~!2010-05-17~!

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Palma Simoniello ◽  
Francesca Trinchella ◽  
Rosaria Scudiero ◽  
Silvana Filosa ◽  
Chiara Maria Motta
Keyword(s):  
Podarcis Sicula

scholarly journals Effects of Combination of Different −10 Hexamers and Downstream Sequences on Stationary-Phase-Specific Sigma Factor ςS-Dependent Transcription in Pseudomonas putida

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (23) ◽  
pp. 6707-6713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eve-Ly Ojangu ◽  
Andres Tover ◽  
Riho Teras ◽  
Maia Kivisaar
Keyword(s):  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Pseudomonas Putida ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Sigma Factors ◽  
Deficient Mutant ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
In Vivo Experiments ◽  
Silent Genes ◽  
Rna Polymerase Holoenzyme

ABSTRACT The main sigma factor activating gene expression, necessary in stationary phase and under stress conditions, is ςS. In contrast to other minor sigma factors, RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing ςS (EςS) recognizes a number of promoters which are also recognized by that containing ς70 (Eς70). We have previously shown that transposon Tn4652 can activate silent genes in starvingPseudomonas putida cells by creating fusion promoters during transposition. The sequence of the fusion promoters is similar to the ς70-specific promoter consensus. The −10 hexameric sequence and the sequence downstream from the −10 element differ among these promoters. We found that transcription from the fusion promoters is stationary phase specific. Based on in vivo experiments carried out with wild-type and rpoS-deficient mutant P. putida, the effect of ςS on transcription from the fusion promoters was established only in some of these promoters. The importance of the sequence of the −10 hexamer has been pointed out in several published papers, but there is no information about whether the sequences downstream from the −10 element can affect ςS-dependent transcription. Combination of the −10 hexameric sequences and downstream sequences of different fusion promoters revealed that ςS-specific transcription from these promoters is not determined by the −10 hexameric sequence only. The results obtained in this study indicate that the sequence of the −10 element influences ςS-specific transcription in concert with the sequence downstream from the −10 box.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document