scholarly journals Retinoids and oestrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals in saline sewage treatment plants: Removal efficiencies and ecological risks to marine organisms

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 103-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Jie Zhou ◽  
Xiao-Yan Li ◽  
Kenneth Mei Yee Leung
Keyword(s):  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Marine Organisms ◽  
Ecological Risks ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting ◽  
Removal Efficiencies

Analysis and occurrence of typical endocrine-disrupting chemicals in three sewage treatment plants

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (11) ◽  
pp. 2501-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Y. Wang ◽  
X. H. Zhang ◽  
N. F. Y. Tam
Keyword(s):  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Average Concentration ◽  
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
Physical Treatment ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
Treatment Processes ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting

Seven typical endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including bisphenol A (BPA), 4-tert-octylphenol (OP), estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), 17α-estradiol (17α-E2), estriol (E3) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in wastewater, were simultaneously determined with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Samples, including influents, effluents and wastewater of different unit processes, were taken seasonally from three different sewage treatment plants. The result showed that BPA and EE2 were the two main types of EDCs in all the samples. The average concentration of BPA were in the range of 268.1–2,588.5 ng l−1 in influents and 34.0–3,099.6 ng l−1 in effluents, while EE2 ranging from 133.1 to 403.2 ng l−1 and from 35.3 to 269.1 ng l−1, respectively. Seasonal change of EDCs levels in effluents was obvious between wet season and dry season. Besides, BPA and E3 could be effectively removed by the biological treatment processes (oxidation ditch and A2/O) with the unit removal of 64–91% and 63–100% for each compound, while other five EDCs had moderate or low removal rates. The study also proved that physical treatment processes, including screening, primary sedimentation and pure aeration, had no or little effect on EDCs removal.

Analytical methodologies for determining the occurrence of endocrine disrupting chemicals in sewage treatment plants and natural waters

2004 ◽  
Vol 501 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo Laganà ◽  
Alessandro Bacaloni ◽  
Ilaria De Leva ◽  
Angelo Faberi ◽  
Giovanna Fago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Waters ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting

Fate and analysis of endocrine disrupting chemicals in some sewage treatment plants in Australia

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 2187-2194 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Coleman ◽  
S. J. Khan ◽  
G. Watkins ◽  
R. M. Stuetz
Keyword(s):  
New South ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Tertiary Treatment ◽  
Domestic Waste ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Androgenic Activity ◽  
Treated Sewage ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting

There are limited studies on the fate and levels of endocrine disrupting chemicals in sewage treatment plants in Australia. Research undertaken in Europe and North America has shown biologically significant levels of both oestrogenic and androgenic chemicals in sewage effluent. The aim of this work was to determine the oestrogenic and androgenic activities of raw and treated sewage from sewage treatment plants run by MidCoast Water, New South Wales, Australia. Oestrogenic and androgenic activities were measured using a yeast screen bioassay. Results showed that the raw effluent contained biologically significant levels of both oestrogenic (0.58–2.91 ng/l) and androgenic (216–480 ng/l) activities. Androgenic activity was significantly higher than oestrogenic activity, which was consistent with other Australian studies and was attributed to the higher levels of androgens in domestic waste from human excretion compared to oestrogens. Secondary treatment (using activated sludge) removed the majority of the oestrogenic and androgenic activity (up to 99%). Tertiary treatment by UV removed varying levels of oestrogenic (19–69%) and androgenic (5–55%) activities. A Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) at one of the STPs, which consists of an MBR followed by electrochlorination removed over 87% of the oestrogenic activity and over 98% of androgenic activity from raw sewage samples. However, levels which could be biologically significant still remained after secondary and tertiary treatment (>0.1 ng/l oestrogenic activity and >1 ng/l androgenic activity).

Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals by ozonation in sewage treatment

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 123-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heqing Zhang ◽  
Harumi Yamada ◽  
Sung-Eun Kim ◽  
Hyo-sang Kim ◽  
Hiroshi Tsuno
Keyword(s):  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Secondary Effluent ◽  
Batch Reactors ◽  
Efficient Removal ◽  
Batch Mode ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemical ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting ◽  
By Products

Treatment experiments by two laboratory scale semi-batch reactors and a demonstration scale process were both carried out to evaluate endocrine disrupting chemical removal characteristics by ozonation in sewage treatment. In the semi-batch mode experiments, secondary effluent and primary effluent of sewage treatment plants were ozonated respectively. Behaviour of brominated by-products was also evaluated. The results based on these studies indicated that estrogenicity in wastewater can be removed by ozonation effectively. The condition of ozonation until dissolved ozone concentration increased to 0.1 mg/L, which corresponded to 1 mgO3/mgC and 0.4 mgO3/mgC of ozone consumption per initial DOC for secondary effluent and primary effluent, respectively, is proposed as an appropriate operational condition for efficient removal of EDCs as well as UV254 and SUVA without production of brominated by-products.

Behaviour of selected endocrine-disrupting chemicals in three sewage treatment plants of Beijing, China

2009 ◽  
Vol 161 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 107-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haidong Zhou ◽  
Xia Huang ◽  
Xiaolin Wang ◽  
Xiahui Zhi ◽  
Chengdui Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting ◽  
Beijing China

scholarly journals Distribution and Removal of Pharmaceuticals in Liquid and Solid Phases in the Unit Processes of Sewage Treatment Plants

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junwon Park ◽  
Changsoo Kim ◽  
Youngmin Hong ◽  
Wonseok Lee ◽  
Hyenmi Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Biofilm Reactor ◽  
Relative Distribution ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Sewage Treatment Plants ◽  
Treatment Processes ◽  
Mass Load ◽  
Removal Efficiencies

In this study, we analyzed 27 pharmaceuticals in liquid and solid phase samples collected from the unit processes of four different sewage treatment plants (STPs) to evaluate their distribution and behavior of the pharmaceuticals. The examination of the relative distributions of various categories of pharmaceuticals in the influent showed that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the most dominant. While the relative distribution of antibiotics in the influent was not high (i.e., 3%–5%), it increased to 14%–30% in the effluent. In the four STPs, the mass load of the target pharmaceuticals was reduced by 88%–95% mainly in the biological treatment process, whereas the ratio of pharmaceuticals in waste sludge to those in the influent (w/w) was only 2%. In all the STPs, the removal efficiencies for the stimulant caffeine, NSAIDs (acetaminophen, naproxen, and acetylsalicylic acid), and the antibiotic cefradine were high; they were removed mainly by biological processes. Certain compounds, such as the NSAID ketoprofen, contrast agent iopromide, lipid regulator gemfibrozil, and antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, showed varying removal efficiencies depending on the contribution of biodegradation and sludge sorption. In addition, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed to compare the pharmaceutical removal efficiencies of the biological treatment processes in the four STPs, which were a membrane bioreactor (MBR) process, sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process, anaerobic–anoxic–oxic (A2O) process, and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process. Among the biological processes, the removal efficiency was in the order of MBR > SBR > A2O > MBBR. Among the tertiary treatment processes investigated, powdered activated carbon showed the highest removal efficiency of 18%–63% for gemfibrozil, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, atenolol, cimetidine, and trimethoprim.

Effect of wastewater chlorination on endocrine disruptor removal

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (7) ◽  
pp. 1551-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Noutsopoulos ◽  
D. Mamais ◽  
V. Samaras ◽  
T. Bouras ◽  
M. Marneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ◽  
Wastewater Reuse ◽  
Endocrine System ◽  
Secondary Effluent ◽  
Batch Tests ◽  
Toxic Metabolites ◽  
Endocrine Disrupting ◽  
Water Courses ◽  
Removal Efficiencies

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are compounds of mainly anthropogenic origin that interfere with the endocrine system of animals and humans thus causing a series of disorders. Wastewater treatment plants are one of the major routes for transporting such chemicals to the water courses. In the context of this study, several chlorination batch tests were performed in order to assess the effectiveness of chlorination to remove bisphenol A (BPA), triclosan (TCS), nonylphenol (NP) and its ethoxylates (NP1EO and NP2EO) from secondary effluent. According to the results, an appreciable removal of NP, BPA and TCS to the order of 60–84% was observed as an effect of moderate chlorination doses. This was not the case for NP1EO and NP2EO as even at high chlorine doses, removal efficiencies were lower (37% for NP1EO and 52% for NP2EO). Removal efficiencies of NP, BPA and TCS are practically independent of contact time, although this was not the case for NP1EO and NP2EO. Based on toxicity experiments, it is anticipated that following chlorination of the target chemicals, production of more toxic metabolites is taking place. Therefore the effectiveness of chlorination to remove EDCs is questionable and more research is needed to guarantee safe wastewater reuse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document