Probabilistic dynamic behavior of a long-span bridge under extreme events

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1657-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wu ◽  
S.R. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Behavior ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Long Span Bridge

Handling and Shipping of Long Span Bridge Beams

PCI Journal ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 86-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Laszlo ◽  
Richard R. Imper
Keyword(s):  
Long Span ◽  
Long Span Bridge ◽  
Bridge Beams

scholarly journals Test Research on Toughness Evaluation of Long-span Bridge Welded Joint

2021 ◽  
Vol 787 (1) ◽  
pp. 012192
Author(s):  
Changqing Wu ◽  
Qiming Yu ◽  
Botao Zhu ◽  
Huangyi Ling ◽  
Jiaqi Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Welded Joint ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Long Span Bridge ◽  
Toughness Evaluation

Wind-induced dynamic behavior and its load estimation of a single-layer latticed dome with a long span

2001 ◽  
Vol 89 (14-15) ◽  
pp. 1671-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Uematsu ◽  
Osamu Kuribara ◽  
Motohiko Yamada ◽  
Akihiro Sasaki ◽  
Takeshi Hongo
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Behavior ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Load Estimation ◽  
Long Span

Super-long span bridge aerodynamics: on-going results of the TG3.1 benchmark test – Step 1.2

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Diana ◽  
Stoyan Stoyanoff ◽  
Andrew Allsop ◽  
Luca Amerio ◽  
Tommaso Argentini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Models ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Numerical Comparison ◽  
Aeroelastic Stability ◽  
Turbulent Wind ◽  
Long Span Bridges ◽  
Buffeting Response ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Long Span Bridge ◽  
Sectional Model

<p>This paper is part of a series of publications aimed at the divulgation of the results of the 3-step benchmark proposed by the IABSE Task Group 3.1 to define reference results for the validation of the software that simulate the aeroelastic stability and the response to the turbulent wind of super-long span bridges. Step 1 is a numerical comparison of different numerical models both a sectional model (Step 1.1) and a full bridge (Step 1.2) are studied. Step 2 will be the comparison of predicted results and experimental tests in wind tunnel. Step 3 will be a comparison against full scale measurements.</p><p>The results of Step 1.1 related to the response of a sectional model were presented to the last IABSE Symposium in Nantes 2018. In this paper, the results of Step 1.2 related to the response long-span full bridge are presented in this paper both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response, comparing the results coming from several TG members.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document