Special sets of the Hermitian surface and indicator sets

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 97-101
Author(s):  
Antonio Cossidente ◽  
Giuseppe Marino ◽  
Olga Polverino
Keyword(s):  
Hermitian Surface ◽  
Indicator Sets

Special sets of the Hermitian surface and indicator sets

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Cossidente ◽  
Giuseppe Marino ◽  
Olga Polverino
Keyword(s):  
Hermitian Surface ◽  
Indicator Sets

Hermitian indicator sets

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cossidente ◽  
G Lunardon ◽  
G Marino ◽  
O Polverino
Keyword(s):  
Indicator Sets

scholarly journals Derivation techniques on the Hermitian surface

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cossidente ◽  
G. L. Ebert ◽  
G. Marino
Keyword(s):  
Hermitian Surface

scholarly journals Applying the SDGs to Cities: Business as Usual or a New Dawn?

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Zinkernagel ◽  
James Evans ◽  
Lena Neij
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Sustainable Urban Development ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
Urban Contexts ◽  
The Many ◽  
Business As Usual ◽  
The City ◽  
Indicator Sets

With growing urbanisation the sustainability of cities has become increasingly important. Although cities have been using indicators for a long time it is only in the last decades that attempts have been made to collate indicators into sets that reflect the many different aspects required to assess the sustainability of a city. The aim of this paper is to review the evolution of indicators for monitoring sustainable urban development in order to understand how ‘new’ the indicators suggested by the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are for cities and the challenges they may face in using them. The review reveals that previous indicator sets emphasised environmental sustainability, health and economic growth. It is also shown that indicator sets that pre-date the SDGs lacked dimensions such as gender equality and reduced inequalities. In all, the SDG indicators provide the possibility of a more balanced and integrated approach to urban sustainability monitoring. At the same time, further research is needed to understand how to adapt the SDGs, targets and indicators to specific urban contexts. Challenges of local application include their large number, their generic characteristics and the need to complement them with specific indicators that are more relevant at the city level.

scholarly journals Transitive ovoids of the Hermitian surface of PG(3,q2), q even

2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cossidente ◽  
G. Korchmáros
Keyword(s):  
Hermitian Surface

scholarly journals Abbreviated Care-Process Quality Indicator Sets Linked with Survival and Functional Status Benefit in Older Adults Under Ambulatory Care

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1442-1450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Min ◽  
David Reuben ◽  
Arun Karlamangla ◽  
Arash Naeim ◽  
Katherine Prenovost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Ambulatory Care ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Quality Indicator ◽  
Process Quality ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Indicator Sets

Evaluating Sustainability on Projects Using Indicators

2013 ◽  
pp. 194-211
Author(s):  
Jude Talbot ◽  
Ray Venkataraman
Keyword(s):  
Sustainability Indicator ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Indicator Sets

The objectives of this chapter are: (1) identify different sustainability indicator sets and their strengths and weaknesses; (2) explain what a multi-level analytical hierarchy project is and why it is important to integrating sustainability into such projects; and (3) state the steps in a procedure to integrate sustainability into project baselines.

In Search of Indicators for Assessing Smart and Sustainable Cities and Communities' Performance

2019 ◽  
pp. 265-295
Author(s):  
Anastasia Stratigea ◽  
Akrivi Leka ◽  
Maria Panagiotopoulou
Keyword(s):  
Selection Process ◽  
Smart Cities ◽  
Indicator System ◽  
Urban Environments ◽  
Sustainability Indicators ◽  
City Development ◽  
Sustainable City ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Support Policy ◽  
Indicator Sets

The goal of the paper is to elaborate on sustainability aspects of smart sustainable urban environments. More specifically, at a first step the paper aims at critically reviewing globally initiated state-of-the-art approaches for assessing smart cities' performance as to sustainability objectives. The scope of this effort is to identify sets of indicators used in different approaches as well as convergence/divergence among them. Secondly, an attempt to integrate different indicator sets into a more enriched and coherent indicator system is carried out which, by effectively embedding smart and sustainable city development into sustainability indicators' sets, can be used by various types of cities' examples. Finally, the rationale of the indicators' selection process is depicted, in order to support policy makers and planners' guidance towards choosing an appropriate, city-specific set of sustainability indicators for carrying out relevant assessments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document