Phase II results from a phase I/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of weekly nab-paclitaxel in paediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumours: A collaboration with the European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Network

2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loredana Amoroso ◽  
Victoria Castel ◽  
Gianni Bisogno ◽  
Michela Casanova ◽  
Catalina Marquez-Vega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Children With Cancer ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Paediatric Patients ◽  
Innovative Therapies ◽  
Cancer Network

Dasatinib in Children and Adolescents With Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia: Results of the CA180-018 Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of the Innovative Therapies for Children With Cancer Consortium

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (19) ◽  
pp. 2460-2468 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Michel Zwaan ◽  
Carmelo Rizzari ◽  
Francoise Mechinaud ◽  
Donna L. Lancaster ◽  
Thomas Lehrnbecher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Children With Cancer ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Innovative Therapies

Purpose Dasatinib is a potent BCR-ABL inhibitor with proven efficacy in adults with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) and in imatinib-resistant/intolerant disease. This phase I study of the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium assessed dasatinib safety and efficacy in pediatric patients. Patients and Methods Escalating once-daily dasatinib doses (60 to 120 mg/m2) were administered to children (n = 58) with (i) imatinib-pretreated CML or Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)–positive acute lymhoblastic leukemia (ALL) and (ii) treatment-refractory Ph-negative ALL or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Results Dasatinib safety and efficacy profiles compared favorably with those in adults. The most common drug-related nonhematologic adverse events were nausea (31%, all grades; 2%, grade 3 to 4), headache (22%, 3%), diarrhea (21%, 0%), and vomiting (17%, 2%). Of 17 patients with CML-CP, 14 (82%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and eight (47%) achieved major molecular response. After ≥ 24 months of follow-up, median complete hematologic response (CHR) and major cytogenetic response (MCyR) durations were not reached. Of 17 patients with advanced-phase CML or Ph-positive ALL, six (35%) achieved confirmed CHR and 11 (65%) achieved CCyR. Median MCyR duration was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 17.4 months). No patient with Ph-negative ALL or AML responded. Dasatinib pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable with those in adult studies, showing rapid absorption (time to reach maximum concentration, 0.5 to 6.0 hours) and elimination (mean half-life, 3.0 to 4.4 hours). Conclusion Dasatinib 60 mg/m2 and 80 mg/m2 once-daily dosing were selected for phase II studies in children with Ph-positive leukemias.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of plitidepsin in children with advanced solid tumours: An Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer (ITCC) study

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Geoerger ◽  
Edward J. Estlin ◽  
Isabelle Aerts ◽  
Pamela Kearns ◽  
Brenda Gibson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Children With Cancer ◽  
Innovative Therapies

A phase II study of nilotinib administered to imatinib resistant or intolerant patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in blast crisis (BC) or relapsed/refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7040-7040 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Larson ◽  
O. Ottman ◽  
H. Kantarjian ◽  
P. le Coutre ◽  
M. Baccarani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

7040 Background: Nilotinib is a highly selective Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is 30-fold more potent than imatinib. In a phase I trial, nilotinib demonstrated efficacy and favorable tolerability in these pts. These results expand upon the phase I experience Methods: This phase II open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in adult imatinib-resistant or - intolerant BC pts or pts with relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL. Primary endpoint was investigator assessment of best hematologic response for BC and complete response for Ph+ALL pts. Nilotinib was started at 400mg BID with escalation to 600mg BID if no adequate response. Results: Safety and efficacy data are reported for 120 BC (27 lymphoid, 87 myeloid, 6 unknown) and 41 Ph+ALL pts (37 active disease, 4 residual disease, 38 relapsed, 3 refractory). 60% of pts had >35% Ph+ metaphases for BC and 31% for Ph+ALL. Median ages was 54 yrs for BC and 46 yrs for Ph+ALL pts. Chromosomal abnormalities other than Ph+ were noted in 64 (53%) BC and 12 (29%) Ph+ALL pts. Extramedullary involvement was present in 44 (37%) BC and 3 (7%) Ph+ALL pts. Treatment is ongoing for 21 (18%) BC and 4 (10%) Ph+ALL pts. Majority of discontinuations were due to disease progression [61 (51%) in BC; 26 (63%) in Ph+ALL). Median treatment duration was 53 (1–441) and 72 (3–363) days for BC and Ph+ALL, respectively. Median dose intensity was 800mg/day for both pt groups. CHR was reported in 25 (21%) pts, marrow responses in 7 (6%) pts, and return to chronic phase in 10 (8%) pts. Complete response was reported in 10 (24%) Ph+ALL; of which, 1 patient had minimal residual disease. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (41%), neutropenia (28%), pneumonia (11%), and anemia (27%) in BC and thrombocytopenia (24%) in Ph+ALL pts. During study period death occurred in 9 (8%) BC and 3 (7%) Ph+ALL pts. No Ph+ALL pt developed CNS disease while on therapy. Conclusions: Nilotinib has significant clinical activity and is well tolerated in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant BC and relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL pts. Nilotinib represents an important new treatment option for these pts in which there remains a high unmet medical need. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I/II study of cetuximab (cet) in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) in first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (JACCRO CC-06).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 571-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihito Tsuji ◽  
Yu Sunakawa ◽  
Tadamichi Denda ◽  
Yasutaka Takinishi ◽  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Dose Adaptation ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Early Tumor ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Level 2

571 Background: Both SOX and cet are effective treatments each other in patients (pts) with mCRC. COIN trial indicated that the use of cet in combination with capacitabine and oxaliplatin should not be recommended. However, the safety and efficacy of cet plus SOX are not clear. To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of the combination, we conducted a multi-center phase I/II study. Methods: In this trial, we assigned pts with KRAS wild type (wt), EGFR-expressing tumor and no prior chemotherapy to receive cet (initial dose 400, and 250 mg/m2 weekly) followed by SOX (oxaliplatin on day 1 and S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14). The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The phase I part was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) according to the dose adaptation schedule of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 for level 1 and 130 mg/m2 for level 2). In the following phase II part, the enrolled pts were treated with the RD. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) evaluated by the external review board according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, and safety. In addition, we prospectively evaluated early tumor shrinkage (ETS). Results: A total of 67 pts were enrolled from January 2012 to February 2013. In the phase I part, level 2 was determined to be the RD. The MTD was not determined because dose limiting toxicity was not confirmed in level 2. In the phase II part, 59 pts including 6 pts of phase I cohort were assessable for the efficacy. The median age was 64 years, 51% of pts were male, and ECOG PS 0 was observed in 85% of pts. The median course of treatment was 5 (range 1-14). The RR was 62.7% (95%CI, 50.4 to 75.1) and ETS was observed in 72% of pts. In safety analysis, grade 3 or worse adverse events were platelet count decreased (13.1%), neutropenia (8.2%), anorexia (11.7%), rash acneform (6.7%) and peripheral neuropathy (3.3%). Conclusions: We determined the RD of cet plus SOX treatment in pts with mCRC. This combination is tolerable at full doses of cet and SOX, with manageable toxicities, and demonstrates advantages in RR for pts with KRAS wt tumor. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented. Clinical trial information: UMIN000007022.

TACTICAL: A phase I/II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MSCTRAIL in the treatment of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9116-TPS9116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Davies ◽  
Beth Sage ◽  
Krishna Kolluri ◽  
Doraid Alrifai ◽  
Rebecca Graham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Lung

TPS9116 Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) migrate to and incorporate into tumour stroma allowing them to act as vehicles for delivering anti-cancer therapies. TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) selectively induces apoptosis in malignant cells however short biological half-life has its limited therapeutic efficacy. We have transduced umbilical cord MSCs with a lentiviral vector to express TRAIL (MSCTRAIL). These cells trigger apoptosis selectively in cancer cells with evidence of synergistic activity with other systemic anti-cancer therapies. Given their immune-privileged nature we are delivering ex vivo pooled MSCTRAIL from third party donors without tissue matching or immunosuppression. Efficacy has been demonstrated using in vitro co-culture assays and in vivo in orthotopic lung metastasis murine model, showing regression of metastases following treatment with intravenous MSCTRAIL [1]. Methods: TACTICAL is a phase I/II trial assessing safety and efficacy of MSCTRAIL in combination with first line standard of care (SOC); pemetrexed (500mg/m2) and cisplatin (75mg/m2) and/or pembrolizumab (200mg), in treatment naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Patients have no actionable driver mutations and ECOG performance status 0-1. Phase I is a dose de-escalation study, patients receive SOC on day 1 and 4x108 MSCTRAIL cells on day 2 of a 21 day cycle for 3 cycles. A Bayesian adaptive design will recommend dose reductions if excessive toxicities occur. Primary outcomes are to determine recommended phase II dose along with safety and tolerability of MSCTRAIL. 46 patients will then be randomised into a multi-centre phase II double blind, placebo-controlled trial to receive SOC and either MSCTRAIL or placebo (1:1). Primary outcome is tumour response rate by RECIST (v 1.1) criteria at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include, best overall response, duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival. TACTICAL is the first clinical trial of this novel cell and gene therapy and if successful will pave the way for future allogeneic MSC therapy in cancer. 1. Loebinger, M.R., et al., Mesenchymal stem cell delivery of TRAIL can eliminate metastatic cancer. Cancer Res, 2009. 69(10): p. 4134-42. Clinical trial information: NCT03298763.

Nalpha-Methylhistamine Safety and Efficacy in Migraine Prophylaxis: Phase I and Phase II Studies

2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebeca O. Millan-Guerrero ◽  
Alicia G. Pineda-Lucatero ◽  
Trujillo Hernandez-Benjamin ◽  
Carlos E. Tene ◽  
Mauro F. Pacheco
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Migraine Prophylaxis ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Phase Ii Studies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document