Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and BRCA-like status in stage III breast cancer patients randomised to adjuvant intensified platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 240-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonora de Boo ◽  
Ashley Cimino-Mathews ◽  
Yoni Lubeck ◽  
Antonios Daletzakis ◽  
Mark Opdam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

scholarly journals Predictive and prognostic role of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao-hua Gao ◽  
Cun-xin Li ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Jia-yuan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Abstract Background Whether tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play different roles in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer remains unknown. Additionally, their prognostic and predictive value in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer is still controversial. The aim of our meta-analysis was to assess the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer by summarizing all relevant studies performing multivariate analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Database and Web of Science were comprehensively searched (until March 2020). Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect measures to perform our meta-analysis. A random effect model was used. Stata software, version 15 (2017) (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results Thirty-three studies including 18,170 eligible breast cancer patients were analysed. The meta-analysis showed that high TIL expression was significantly associated with increased pathological complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with the HER2-enriched molecular subtype (OR = 1.137, 95% CI [1.061 ~ 1.218], p < 0.001) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype (OR = 1.120, 95% CI [1.061 ~ 1.182], p < 0.001). However, high TIL expression was not significantly associated with high pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with the luminal molecular subtype of breast cancer (OR = 1.154, 95% CI [0.789 ~ 1.690], p = 0.460). We carried out a meta-analysis on the HRs of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) to assess the prognostic value of TILs in breast cancer with different molecular subtypes more deeply. Our meta-analysis confirmed that high TILs were associated with significantly improved DFS in patients with the HER2-enriched molecular subtype [HR = 0.940, 95% CI (0.903 ~ 0.979), p = 0.003] and TNBC molecular subtype [HR = 0.907, 95% CI (0.862 ~ 0.954), p < 0.001]. However, high TILs were not associated with significantly better DFS in patients with the luminal molecular subtype of breast cancer [HR = 0.998, 95% CI (0.977 ~ 1.019), p = 0.840]. Furthermore, the results confirmed that high TILs were significantly related to better OS in patients with the HER2-enriched molecular subtype [HR = 0.910, 95% CI (0.866 ~ 0.957), p < 0.001] and TNBC molecular subtype [HR = 0.869, 95% CI (0.836 ~ 0.904), p < 0.001]. Conversely, the summarized results indicated that high TILs were significantly associated with poor OS in patients with the luminal molecular subtype of breast cancer [HR = 1.077, 95% CI (1.016 ~ 1.141), p = 0.012]. Conclusions Our meta-analysis confirms that high TILs are associated with favourable survival and predicts pCR in breast cancer patients with the TNBC and HER2-enriched molecular subtypes.

Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11532-e11532
Author(s):  
Hee-Chul Shin ◽  
Wonshik Han ◽  
Hyeong-Gon Moon ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer

e11532 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is a reasonable option for operable breast cancer in terms of downsizing large tumor and increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, BCS in patients with large breast tumors down-staged by NCT remains still controversial because of the possibility of residual tumor and resistance to NCT. Aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival results of patients who received NCT and BCS compared to patients who received BCS first and to compare recurrence and survival rates between patients who received preplanned BCS and those who received down-staged BCS among patients who underwent NCT. Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who received BCS after NCT (NCT group) and 72 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who underwent BCS first (Surgery group) were retrospectively reviewed. Among 70 patients received NCT, 45 patients (64.3%) received preplanned BCS (preplanned BCS group) and 25 patients (35.7%) received down-staged BCS (down-staged BCS group). The long-term results including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease recurrence and survival rates were compared with groups. Results: There was no significant difference in IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival rates, disease-free survival and overall survival rates between the NCT and the Surgery group (p=0.971, p=0.294, p=0.863 and p=0.933, respectively). Among patients who received NCT, IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates was not also different between the preplanned BCS group and the down-staged BCS group (p=0.278, p=0.501, p=0.776 and p=0.412, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients who received BCS after NCT showed similar long-term resutls compared to patients who received BCS first in clinical stage III breast cancer patients. Also, down-staged BCS shows is oncologically as safe as preplanned BCS in clinical stage III breast cancer patients in terms of recurrence and survival.

Prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in stage III breast cancer patients who received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 670-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lee ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
W. Han ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer ◽  
Erbb2 Overexpression ◽  
Er Expression

670 Background: Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic marker and regulated by hormonal receptor pathways in breast cancer. We performed this study to assess the prognostic significance of ER, PR, p53, c-erbB2, bcl-2, Ki-67, and EGFR as a marker for relapse in breast cancer patients who received same adjuvant therapy in a single institution. Methods: A cohort of 154 curatively resected breast cancer patients who had 4 lymph nodes or more and received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (AC/T) as adjuvant chemotherapy was analyzed for clinicopathologic characteristics including disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with ER and/or PR expression received 5 years of tamoxifen following AC/T. The markers were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Results: Median f/u duration was 25 months and 32 patients (20.8%) had recurrences. Stage (IIIa vs. IIIc) affected recurrences significantly, however, types of surgery, histology, histologic grade, presence of endolymphatic emboli, or close resection margin did not. Among the immunohistochemical markers, bcl-2 expression was the only one to be associated significantly with prolonged DFS (median 54 mo in bcl-2 (−) vs. not reached in bcl-2 (+); p=0.016). Furthermore, bcl-2 was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in multivariate analysis. Bcl-2 expression was significantly correlated with ER expression (p<0.001), and inversely correlated with c-erbB2 overexpression (p=0.027). Patients with both ER and bcl-2 expression had a longer DFS compared to the other patients (not reached vs. 54 mo, p=0.019). Patients with bcl-2 expression had a significantly longer DFS even in ER (+) subgroups (not reached vs 54 mo; p=0.011). Patients with c-erbB2 overexpression, ER (−) and bcl-2 (−) had a shorter DFS than the others (38 mo vs. not reached; p=0.029). Conclusions: In our homogenous patient cohort, bcl-2 expression was correlated with ER expression, and inversely correlated with c-erbB2 overexpression. Bcl-2 was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in curatively resected stage III breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document