scholarly journals Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in early and metastatic breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Mierzynska ◽  
Mekdes Taye ◽  
Madeline Pe ◽  
Corneel Coens ◽  
Francesca Martinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Reference Values ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Quality of Life in a Randomized Trial of Group Psychosocial Support in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Overall Effects of the Intervention and an Exploration of Missing Data

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1944-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Bordeleau ◽  
John Paul Szalai ◽  
Marguerite Ennis ◽  
Molyn Leszcz ◽  
Michael Speca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Missing Data ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a standardized group psychosocial intervention on health-related quality of life (HrQOL) in women with metastatic breast cancer and to explore the effect of missing data in HrQOL analyses. Patients and Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, seven Canadian centers randomly assigned 235 eligible women to participate in a weekly, 90-minute, therapist-led support group that adhered to principles of supportive-expressive (SE) therapy or to a control arm (no SE). All women received educational material and any type of medical or psychosocial care deemed necessary. HrQOL data were prospectively collected using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months. The primary HrQOL analyses compared scores in the two study arms. Analyses were limited to women with appropriate baseline HrQOL information (n = 215). Results: Baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were not different between the two study arms (all P > .05). Primary analysis of all subscales failed to show a significant influence of the intervention on HrQOL (all P > .05). There was a significant deterioration over time in several functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30: global (P = .03), physical (P = .0002), role (P = .01), and cognitive functioning (P = .04); and in symptom scales: dyspnea (P = .007), appetite loss (P = .04), and fatigue (P = .003); these changes were independent of randomization allocation. Results were similar in additional analyses of overall HrQOL using a variety of approaches to handling missing data. Conclusion: Supportive-expressive group therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer does not appear to influence HrQOL, as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.

scholarly journals Measuring the Time to Deterioration for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Using a Web-Based Monitoring Application: Longitudinal Cohort Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Brusniak ◽  
Manuel Feisst ◽  
Linda Sebesteny ◽  
Andreas Hartkopf ◽  
Joachim Graf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Eq Vas

BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is used to evaluate the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In a long-term therapy setting, HRQoL can be used as an important benchmark for treatment success. With the help of digital apps, HRQoL monitoring can be extended to more remote areas and be administered on a more frequent basis. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate 3 common HRQoL questionnaires in metastasized breast cancer in terms of TTD in a digital, web-based setting. We further aim to examine the development of the HRQoL in different systemic treatment groups in each of these evaluation instruments. METHODS A total of 192 patients with metastatic breast cancer were analyzed in this bicentric prospective online cohort study at two German university hospitals. Patients completed questionnaires on HRQoL (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale [EQ-VAS], EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level [EQ-5D-5L], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 item [EORTC QLQ-C30]) via an online platform over a 6-month period. Treatment schedules and medical history were retrieved from medical records. Unadjusted Cox regression analysis on treatment-related factors was performed. We conducted subgroup analyses in regard to TTD events between different treatments. RESULTS The EQ-VAS showed a higher rate of deterioration after 8 weeks (84/179, 46.9%) than the EQ-5D-5L (47/163, 28.8%) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (65/176, 36.9%). Unadjusted Cox regression revealed significant connections between known metastases in the liver (<i>P</i>=.03, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52) and pleura (<i>P</i>=.04, HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.96) in the EQ-VAS. Significant relations between EQ-VAS events and single EQ-5D-5L items and the EQ-5D-5L summary score were demonstrated. All treatment groups significantly differed from the CDK4/6 inhibition subgroup in the EQ-VAS. CONCLUSIONS Compared to the EQ-5D-5L and QLQ-C30, the EQ-VAS showed a higher rate of deterioration after 8 weeks. Significant connections to certain metastatic locations were only detected in the EQ-VAS. The EQ-VAS is capable of reflecting the distinctive HRQoL profiles of different systemic treatments as well as the different aspects of HRQoL presented in the EQ-5D-5L. TTD with the EQ-VAS is an adequate mean of examining longitudinal development of HRQoL among breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Measuring the Time to Deterioration for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Using a Web-Based Monitoring Application: Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Cancer ◽  
10.2196/25776 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e25776
Author(s):  
Katharina Brusniak ◽  
Manuel Feisst ◽  
Linda Sebesteny ◽  
Andreas Hartkopf ◽  
Joachim Graf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Eq Vas

Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is used to evaluate the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In a long-term therapy setting, HRQoL can be used as an important benchmark for treatment success. With the help of digital apps, HRQoL monitoring can be extended to more remote areas and be administered on a more frequent basis. Objective This study aims to evaluate 3 common HRQoL questionnaires in metastasized breast cancer in terms of TTD in a digital, web-based setting. We further aim to examine the development of the HRQoL in different systemic treatment groups in each of these evaluation instruments. Methods A total of 192 patients with metastatic breast cancer were analyzed in this bicentric prospective online cohort study at two German university hospitals. Patients completed questionnaires on HRQoL (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale [EQ-VAS], EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level [EQ-5D-5L], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core 30 item [EORTC QLQ-C30]) via an online platform over a 6-month period. Treatment schedules and medical history were retrieved from medical records. Unadjusted Cox regression analysis on treatment-related factors was performed. We conducted subgroup analyses in regard to TTD events between different treatments. Results The EQ-VAS showed a higher rate of deterioration after 8 weeks (84/179, 46.9%) than the EQ-5D-5L (47/163, 28.8%) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (65/176, 36.9%). Unadjusted Cox regression revealed significant connections between known metastases in the liver (P=.03, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52) and pleura (P=.04, HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.96) in the EQ-VAS. Significant relations between EQ-VAS events and single EQ-5D-5L items and the EQ-5D-5L summary score were demonstrated. All treatment groups significantly differed from the CDK4/6 inhibition subgroup in the EQ-VAS. Conclusions Compared to the EQ-5D-5L and QLQ-C30, the EQ-VAS showed a higher rate of deterioration after 8 weeks. Significant connections to certain metastatic locations were only detected in the EQ-VAS. The EQ-VAS is capable of reflecting the distinctive HRQoL profiles of different systemic treatments as well as the different aspects of HRQoL presented in the EQ-5D-5L. TTD with the EQ-VAS is an adequate mean of examining longitudinal development of HRQoL among breast cancer patients.

Primary surgery versus no surgery in synchronous metastastic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes of the ABCSG 28 Posytive trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1074-1074
Author(s):  
Vesna Bjelic-Radisic ◽  
Florian Fitzal ◽  
Guenther G. Steger ◽  
Christian Marth ◽  
Marija Balic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Systemic Therapy ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

1074 Background: The ABCSG 28 Posytive trial compared primary surgery versus primary systemic therapy without surgery in synchronous metastatic breast cancer. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether immediate resection of the primary tumor followed by standard systemic therapy improves median survival compared with no surgical resection (NCT01015625). This report describes quality-of-life (QoL) results. Methods: Patients were randomized between 2011 and 2015. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR 23 before treatment and every 6 months during follow-up. Results: 90 patients (45 with surgery, 45 with primary systemic therapy without surgery) from 15 centers were included in the QoL analysis. At 6 months patients after surgery reported more insomnia, breast symptoms and arm symptoms than patients without surgery, but these differences were no longer present at later follow-up visits. In the univariate and multivariate analysis the global health status and physical functioning scales of EORTC QLQ C30 were statistically significant predictors for OS and TTP (p < 0.05). Over a 24-month follow-up, patients > 60 years showed more QoL impairments than those < 60 years, independent of treatment. Patients < 60 years had better physical functioning and less fatigue, appetite loss, constipation and breast symptoms than older patients. There were no differences in QoL between patients with bone metastases vs those with visceral ± bone metastases. Conclusions: In patients with primary metastatic breast cancer primary surgery does not appear to improve QoL. Global health status and physical functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 appears to be a predictive factor for OS and TTP. Clinical trial information: NCT01015625.

scholarly journals Impact of Treatment with Eribulin (Eri) or Capecitabine (Cap) for Metastatic Breast Cancer (Mbc) on Eq–5D Utility Derived from Eortc Qlq–C30

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv360 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hudgens ◽  
A. Briggs ◽  
G. Velikova ◽  
A. Forsythe ◽  
S. McCutcheon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

scholarly journals Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Kawahara ◽  
Naruto Taira ◽  
Takeru Shiroiwa ◽  
Yasuhiro Hagiwara ◽  
Takashi Fukuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Minimal Important Differences

Abstract Purpose To establish minimal important differences (MIDs) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods The dataset was obtained from the SELECT BC-CONFIRM randomized clinical trial. Anchors obtained from patients (transition items) and clinicians (performance status) were used for anchor-based methods. Anchors obtained through 6 months after starting treatment were used for this analysis. Correlation coefficients of anchor and change in QLQ-C30 and effect size were used to qualify for estimating MIDs. Mean change method and generalized estimating equation were applied to estimate MIDs. Distribution-based methods were used for comparison. Results We analyzed a dataset of 154 metastatic breast cancer patients. MIDs were estimated in 8 of 15 scales of QLQ-C30. Estimated MIDs for within-group improvement varied from 7 to 15 and those for deterioration varied from − 7 to − 17. Estimated MIDs for between-group improvement varied from 5 to 11 and those for deterioration varied from − 5 to − 8 across QLQ-C30 scales. Patient-reported anchors were more susceptible to early changes in health status than clinician-reported anchors. Conclusion We provided the MIDs of the QLQ-C30 using both patient- and clinicians-reported anchors measured in a randomized trial of Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer. We recommend patient-reported anchors for anchor-based estimation of MID. Our results can aid patients and clinicians, as well as researchers, in the interpretation of QLQ-C30.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document