Addressing the best treatment for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing VEGFR-TKis versus mTORi-targeted therapies

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Ciccarese ◽  
Roberto Iacovelli ◽  
Matteo Brunelli ◽  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Davide Bimbatti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immune-based combinations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials

scholarly journals Economic Burden of Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma for French Patients Treated With Targeted Therapies

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e227-e234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiphaine Cholley ◽  
Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin ◽  
Samuel Limat ◽  
Marion Hugues ◽  
Fabien Calcagno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

scholarly journals Differential Diagnosis of Renal Tumors With Clear Cytoplasm: Clinical Relevance of Renal Tumor Subclassification in the Era of Targeted Therapies and Personalized Medicine

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajen Goyal ◽  
Elizabeth Gersbach ◽  
Ximing J. Yang ◽  
Stephen M. Rohan
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumor ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immunohistochemical Stains

Context.—The World Health Organization classification of renal tumors synthesizes morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings to define more than 40 tumor types. Of these, clear cell (conventional) renal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in adults and—with the exception of some rare tumors—the most deadly. The diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma on morphologic grounds alone is generally straightforward, but challenging cases are not infrequent. A misdiagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma has clinical consequences, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies. Objective.—To highlight morphologic mimics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and provide strategies to help differentiate clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other renal tumors and lesions. The role of the pathologist in guiding treatment for renal malignancies will be emphasized to stress the importance of proper tumor classification in patient management. Data Sources.—Published literature and personal experience. Conclusions.—In challenging cases, submission of additional tissue is often an inexpensive and effective way to facilitate a correct diagnosis. If immunohistochemical stains are to be used, it is best to use a panel of markers, as no one marker is specific for a given renal tumor subtype. Selection of limited markers, based on a specific differential diagnosis, can be as useful as a large panel in reaching a definitive diagnosis. For renal tumors, both the presence and absence of immunoreactivity and the pattern of labeling (membranous, cytoplasmic, diffuse, focal) are important when interpreting the results of immunohistochemical stains.

Response to systemic therapy in non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 425-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Emilio Vera-Badillo ◽  
Arnoud Templeton ◽  
Alberto Ocana ◽  
Paulo deGouveia ◽  
Priya Aneja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

425 Background: Clinical data supporting the efficacy of systemic therapy in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) are limited and based on retrospective analyses, expanded access programs and single arm phase II trials. Therefore the optimal treatment for this subgroup remains uncertain. Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted to identify publications evaluating the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC (excluding those with sarcomatoid tumors) treated with different systemic approaches (immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted agents, small molecules). The primary endpoint was response rate and secondary endpoints were median progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Where possible, data were pooled in a meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effect modeling. For studies comprising of unselected patients, outcomes of those with non-ccRCC were compared with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Results: Forty-nine studies comprising 7,799 patients were included: 471 patients were enrolled on studies conducted exclusively in non-ccRCC and 7,328 patients on studies of unselected renal cell carcinoma. Among these, 903 (12%) had non-ccRCC and 6,425 (88%) had ccRCC. For non-ccRCC, overall response rate, median PFS and median OS were 9%, 7.9 and 13.4 months, respectively. By comparison, the overall response rate for ccRCC was 15% (Risk Ratio for response [RR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p=0.002). This association was independent of type of treatment administered. Among the different novel agents (bevacizumab, lenalidomide, linefanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, everolimus and temsirolimus), sunitinib was significantly less efficacious in non-ccRCC than ccRCC (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.72), but there was no significant difference in response rates for sorafenib (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.31-1.35) or other agents (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.50-2.44), However, confidence intervals were wide. Results of further analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Patients with non-ccRCC have lower response rates than those with ccRCC, but the absolute difference between them is modest. Further study of targeted therapy in non-ccRCC is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document