Best practice in oral care for children and young people being treated for cancer: can we achieve consensus?

2004 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1109-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Children And Young People

The importance of parents in the lives of children in the care system

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Thomson ◽  
Ros Thorpe
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Focus ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Natural Family ◽  
Out Of Home Care ◽  
Outcomes For Children

Research to date has found that natural parents may be an important source of identity and support for children in and young people leaving out-of-home care. There has, however, been limited research on natural parents themselves, both internationally and in Australia.This paper provides a justification for a research focus on parents, documents what is known from research to date, highlights current issues for parents and their children in out-of-home care, and concludes by identifying future research priorities in the area. The paper calls for recognition of the need to maintain positive links between natural family members in order to ensure best practice outcomes for children and young people in care.

Hospital-based education support for students with chronic health conditions

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza J. Hopkins
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Educational Support ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Education Support

Objective To examine the evidence for best practice in educational support to hospitalised students and describe the existing supports available across each Australian state and territory. Methods A descriptive approach to the diversity of current practice and a review of the published evidence for best practice. Results We have constructed a model of best-practice in education support to hospitalised students. We found that education support services in each state met some of the criteria for best practice, but no one state service met all of the criteria. Conclusions All Australian states and territories make provision for hospitalised students to continue with their education, however the services in some states are closer to the best-practice model than others. What is known about the topic? It is well known that children and young people living with health conditions are at higher risk of educational underachievement and premature disengagement from school than their healthy peers. Although each state and territory across Australia offers some form of educational support to students during periods of hospitalisation, this support differs widely in each jurisdiction in fundamentals such as which students are eligible for support, where the support is delivered, how it is delivered and who coordinates the support. Published evidence in the literature suggests that the elements of good practice in education support have been well identified but, in practice, lack of policy direction can hinder the implementation of coordinated support. What does this paper add? This paper draws together the different models in place to support students in hospital in each state and territory and identifies the common issues that are faced by hospital education support services, as well as identifying areas where practice differs across settings. It also identifies the elements of good practice from the literature and links the elements of theory and practice to present a model of education support that addresses the needs of students with health conditions in an integrated and child-centred way. What are the implications for practitioners? Education support has developed over many decades in a variety of different forms across the states and territories of Australia. This paper brings together for the first time the published evidence for good practice in this area with existing models of practice to identify ways in which both healthcare professionals and education professionals can work together to improve the health, well being and education of children and young people living with health conditions.

scholarly journals The Relative Merits of an Individualized Versus a Generic Approach to Rating Functional Performance in Childhood Dystonia

Children ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Hortensia Gimeno ◽  
Jessica Farber ◽  
Jessica Thornton ◽  
Helene Polatajko
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Movement Disorders ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Childhood Onset ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Change Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Performance

Aims. The Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS) is an observational measure that captures performance at the level of activity and participation. Developed for use with the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP), it is a highly individualized approach to measurement. CO-OP is currently being studied in childhood-onset hyperkinetic movement disorders (HMD) and deep brain stimulation. The purpose of this study was to compare two different approaches to rating performance, generic (PQRS-G) and individualized (PQRS-I), for children with childhood-onset hyperkinetic movement disorders (HMD) including dystonia. Method. Videotaped activity performances, pre and post intervention were independently scored by two blind raters using PQRS-G PQRS-I. Results were examined to determine if the measures identified differences in e performance on goals chosen by the participants and on change scores after intervention. Dependent t-tests were used to compare performance and change scores. Results. The two approaches to rating both have moderate correlations (all data: 0.764; baseline: 0.677; post-intervention: 0.725) and yielded some different results in capturing performance. There was a significant difference in scores at pre-intervention between the two approaches to rating, even though post-intervention score mean difference was not significantly different. The PQRS-I had a wider score range, capturing wider performance differences, and greater change between baseline and post-intervention performances for children and young people with dystonic movement. Conclusions. Best practice in rehabilitation requires the use of outcome measures that optimally captures performance and performance change for children and young people with dystonic movement. When working with clients with severe motor-performance deficits, PQRS-I appears to be the better approach to capturing performance and performance changes.

scholarly journals Policy addressing suicidality in children and young people: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e023153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne Gilmour ◽  
Edward Duncan ◽  
Margaret Maxwell
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Young People ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Health Issue ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Policy Documents ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Mesh Terms

IntroductionSuicide is one of the leading causes of death among children and young people globally and a major public health issue. Government policies determine how much recognised health issues are prioritised and set the context for investment, development and delivery of services. A review of policies concerning children and young people who are suicidal could shed light on the extent that this public health issue is prioritised and highlight examples of best practice in this area. There has never been a review to explore how policy worldwide addresses the specific needs of this vulnerable population. This review will map the key policy documents and identify their relevance to the review question: how does policy address the treatment and care of children and young people who experience suicidality? (international, national (UK) and local (Scotland)).MethodologyEmploying scoping review methodological guidance a systematic and transparent approach will be taken. Preliminary searches will facilitate the identification of MeSh terms, subject headings, individual database and platform nuances. A full search strategy will be created to search five databases: CINAHL, PsychInfo, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane. Government and other key agency websites (eg, WHO, Unicef) will be searched to identify policy documents. The reference lists of identified documents will be checked. A second reviewer will independently screen and cross validate eligible studies for final inclusion. A data extraction template will then be used to extract key information. We will report our findings using narrative synthesis and tabulate findings, by agreed key components.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required to conduct a scoping review. We will disseminate the findings through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.

Commentary: Child Protection Inquiries: Where are the Voices of Children and Young People?

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 106-108
Author(s):  
Sandra Taylor ◽  
Aileen Ashford
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Child Protection Services ◽  
Life Chances ◽  
Dominant Feature ◽  
Practice Care

Parliamentary Inquiries into the adequacy of child protection services, as well as best practice care and service delivery in child protection, have been a dominant feature of contemporary Australia in recent times. The direct voices of children and young people in such inquiries are usually missing, despite them being at the very centre of the child protection system and a range of government policies. In this paper we reflect upon this issue and consider why these voices are absent and what factors and barriers limit their inclusion. A review of relevant literature and empirical data indicates that the structures, agendas and processes of such Inquiries are intrinsically adult-oriented endeavours in which the contributions and inclusion of children and young people are not easily accommodated. Through adopting a shift in perspective, orientation and practice, the voices and experiences of children and young people can be included in child protection Inquiries that have critical implications for the quality of their lives and their life chances. Such inclusions uphold the rights of children and young people and support the implementation of government policy in practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document