scholarly journals Managing natural wealth: Research and implementation of ecosystem services in the United States and Canada

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 45-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Molnar ◽  
Ida Kubiszewski
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
The United States

A synoptic survey of ecosystem services from headwater catchments in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 106-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H. Hill ◽  
Randall K. Kolka ◽  
Frank H. McCormick ◽  
Matthew A. Starry
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
The United States ◽  
Headwater Catchments

scholarly journals The Woods around the Ivory Tower: A Systematic Review Examining the Value and Relevance of School Forests in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 531
Author(s):  
Kimberly J. Coleman ◽  
Elizabeth E. Perry ◽  
Dominik Thom ◽  
Tatiana M. Gladkikh ◽  
William S. Keeton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
United States ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
The United States ◽  
Local Communities ◽  
Ivory Tower ◽  
Institutions Of Higher Education ◽  
Cultural Ecosystem Services ◽  
Research And Teaching

Throughout the United States, many institutions of higher education own forested tracts, often called school forests, which they use for teaching, research, and demonstration purposes. These school forests provide a range of benefits to the communities in which they are located. However, because administration is often decoupled from research and teaching, those benefits might not always be evident to the individuals who make decisions about the management and use of school forests, which may undervalue their services and put these areas at risk for sale, development, or over-harvesting to generate revenue. To understand what messages are being conveyed about the value and relevance of school forests, we conducted a systematic literature review and qualitatively coded the resulting literature content using an ecosystem services framework. While school forests provide many important benefits to academic and local communities, we found that most of the existing literature omits discussions about cultural ecosystem services that people may receive from school forests. We discuss the implications of this omission and make recommendations for addressing it.

A Comparative Analysis of Accountability Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services Markets in the United States and the European Union

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Glicksman ◽  
Thoko Kaime
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
European Union ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Performance Standards ◽  
The United States ◽  
Environmental Benefits ◽  
Market Manipulation ◽  
The European Union

AbstractMarkets in ecosystem services have the potential to provide financial incentives to protect the environment either in lieu of or in addition to more traditional regulatory programmes. If these markets function properly, they can provide enhanced levels of environmental quality or more efficient mechanisms for protecting natural resources that provide vital services to humans. The theoretical benefits of ecosystem services markets may be undercut, however, if care is not taken in creating the legal infrastructure that supports trading to ensure that trades actually provide the promised environmental benefits. This article identifies five essential pillars of an ecosystem services market regime that are necessary to provide operational accountability safeguards. These include financial safeguards, verifiable performance standards, transparency and public participation standards, regulatory oversight mechanisms, and rule of law safeguards. The article assesses whether the laws of the United States (US) and European Union (EU) are well designed to provide such accountability. It concludes that despite recognition of the risk of market manipulation and outright fraud, regulators in the US and the EU to date have responded to these risks largely in an ad hoc and incomplete fashion, rather than embedding the mechanisms for operational accountability discussed in this article into the regulatory framework that governs ecosystem services trading markets.

scholarly journals Nature as capital: Advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7383-7389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Schaefer ◽  
Erica Goldman ◽  
Ann M. Bartuska ◽  
Ariana Sutton-Grier ◽  
Jane Lubchenco
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Natural Capital ◽  
The United States ◽  
Federal Agencies ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Natural Capital Accounting ◽  
Policies And Programs ◽  
Policies And Practices

The concept of nature as capital is gaining visibility in policies and practices in both the public and private sectors. This change is due to an improved ability to assess and value ecosystem services, as well as to a growing recognition of the potential of an ecosystem services approach to make tradeoffs in decision making more transparent, inform efficient use of resources, enhance resilience and sustainability, and avoid unintended negative consequences of policy actions. Globally, governments, financial institutions, and corporations have begun to incorporate natural capital accounting in their policies and practices. In the United States, universities, nongovernmental organizations, and federal agencies are actively collaborating to develop and apply ecosystem services concepts to further national environmental and economic objectives. Numerous federal agencies have begun incorporating these concepts into land use planning, water resources management, and preparations for, and responses to, climate change. Going forward, well-defined policy direction will be necessary to institutionalize ecosystem services approaches in federal agencies, as well as to guide intersector and interdisciplinary collaborative research and development efforts. In addition, a new generation of decision support tools are needed to further the practical application of ecosystem services principles in policymaking and commercial activities. Improved performance metrics are needed, as are mechanisms to monitor the status of ecosystem services and assess the environmental and economic impacts of policies and programs. A greater national and international financial commitment to advancing ecosystem services and natural capital accounting would likely have broad, long-term economic and environmental benefits.

scholarly journals AN ANALYSIS OF COMMON APPLICATIONS ON HEDONIC PRICING MODEL IN VALUING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EUROPE, US, AND CHINA

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Xuanfei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Real World ◽  
Housing Prices ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hedonic Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Hedonic Pricing Model ◽  
Real World Applications ◽  
The Common

The study made a comparison with the common applications on the hedonic pricing model that valuing ecosystem services between Europe, the United States, and China. By analyzing various reasons impacting housing prices, cultural and historical backgrounds played roles in the real-world applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document