Correlating habitat suitability with landscape connectivity: A case study of Sichuan golden monkey in China

2017 ◽  
Vol 353 ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Liu ◽  
William J. McShea ◽  
Diqiang Li
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Suitability ◽  
Landscape Connectivity ◽  
Golden Monkey ◽  
Sichuan Golden Monkey

scholarly journals Habitat suitability vs landscape connectivity determining roadkill risk at a regional scale: a case study on European badger (Meles meles)

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Fabrizio ◽  
Mirko Di Febbraro ◽  
Marcello D’Amico ◽  
Ludovico Frate ◽  
Federica Roscioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Suitability ◽  
Landscape Connectivity ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Meles Meles ◽  
European Badger

The Development of Habitat Suitability Index Model of Class I Endangered Wildlife, Sedirea japonica - A Case Study of Korea National Park of Dadohaehaesang -

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-172
Author(s):  
Yun-Jin Shim ◽  
Yong-Su Park ◽  
Rae-Ha Jang ◽  
Young-Jun Yoon ◽  
Sun- Ryoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Suitability ◽  
National Park ◽  
Class I ◽  
Habitat Suitability Index ◽  
Index Model ◽  
Suitability Index

scholarly journals Methods for identifying green infrastructure

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Honeck ◽  
Arthur Sanguet ◽  
Martin A. Schlaepfer ◽  
Nicolas Wyler ◽  
Anthony Lehmann
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Green Infrastructure ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Landscape Connectivity ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Integrative Approach ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Political Decisions

AbstractNature forms interdependent networks in a landscape, which is key to the survival of species and the maintenance of genetic diversity. Nature provides crucial socio-economic benefits to people, but they are typically undervalued in political decisions. This has led to the concept of Green Infrastructure (GI), which defines an interlinked network of (semi-)natural areas with high ecological values for wildlife and people, to be conserved and managed in priority to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services. This relatively new concept has been used in different contexts, but with widely diverging interpretations. There is no apparent consensus in the scientific literature on the methodology to map and implement GI. This paper serves as an informed primer for researchers that are new to GI mapping understand the key principles and terminology for the needs of their own case-study, and as a framework for more advance researchers willing to contribute to the formalization of the concept. Through a literature review of articles on creating GI networks, we summarized and evaluated commonly used methods to identify and map GI. We provided key insights for the assessment of diversity, ecosystem services and landscape connectivity, the three ‘pillars’ on which GI identification is based according to its definition. Based on this literature review, we propose 5 theoretical levels toward a more complex, reliable and integrative approach to identify GI networks. We then discuss the applications and limits of such method and point out future challenges for GI identification and implementation.

scholarly journals Evaluating Methods to Establish Habitat Suitability Criteria: A Case Study in the Upper Delaware River Basin, USA

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1765-1775 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Galbraith ◽  
C. J. Blakeslee ◽  
J. C. Cole ◽  
C. A. Talbert ◽  
K. O. Maloney
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Habitat Suitability ◽  
Delaware River ◽  
Evaluating Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document