Topological keystone species in ecological interaction networks: Considering link quality and non-trophic effects

2006 ◽  
Vol 196 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 365-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Vasas ◽  
Ferenc Jordán
Keyword(s):  
Keystone Species ◽  
Interaction Networks ◽  
Link Quality ◽  
Ecological Interaction ◽  
Trophic Effects

scholarly journals Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time

Oikos ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothée Poisot ◽  
Daniel B. Stouffer ◽  
Dominique Gravel
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Networks ◽  
Ecological Interaction ◽  
Space And Time

scholarly journals An equation‐free method reveals the ecological interaction networks within complex microbial ecosystems

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1774-1785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenta Suzuki ◽  
Katsuhiko Yoshida ◽  
Yumiko Nakanishi ◽  
Shinji Fukuda
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Networks ◽  
Ecological Interaction ◽  
Microbial Ecosystems

scholarly journals An equation-free method reveals the ecological interaction networks within complex microbial ecosystems

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenta Suzuki ◽  
Katsuhiko Yoshida ◽  
Yumiko Nakanishi ◽  
Shinji Fukuda
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Microbial Communities ◽  
Microbial Processes ◽  
Interaction Networks ◽  
List Type ◽  
Metagenomic Sequencing ◽  
Ecological Interactions ◽  
Microbial Interaction ◽  
Ecological Interaction ◽  
Dataset Size

AbstractMapping the network of ecological interactions is key to understanding the composition, stability, function and dynamics of microbial communities. In recent years various approaches have been used to reveal microbial interaction networks from metagenomic sequencing data, such as time-series analysis, machine learning and statistical techniques. Despite these efforts it is still not possible to capture details of the ecological interactions behind complex microbial dynamics.We developed the sparse S-map method (SSM), which generates a sparse interaction network from a multivariate ecological time-series without presuming any mathematical formulation for the underlying microbial processes. The advantage of the SSM over alternative methodologies is that it fully utilizes the observed data using a framework of empirical dynamic modelling. This makes the SSM robust to non-equilibrium dynamics and underlying complexity (nonlinearity) in microbial processes.We showed that an increase in dataset size or a decrease in observational error improved the accuracy of SSM whereas, the accuracy of a comparative equation-based method was almost unchanged for both cases and equivalent to the SSM at best. Hence, the SSM outperformed a comparative equation-based method when datasets were large and the magnitude of observational errors were small. The results were robust to the magnitude of process noise and the functional forms of inter-specific interactions that we tested. We applied the method to a microbiome data of six mice and found that there were different microbial interaction regimes between young to middle age (4-40 week-old) and middle to old age (36-72 week-old) mice.The complexity of microbial relationships impedes detailed equation-based modeling. Our method provides a powerful alternative framework to infer ecological interaction networks of microbial communities in various environments and will be improved by further developments in metagenomics sequencing technologies leading to increased dataset size and improved accuracy and precision.

Studying the sensory ecology of frog-biting midges (Corethrellidae: Diptera) and their frog hosts using ecological interaction networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 307 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. U. Grafe ◽  
H. H. Ahmad Sah ◽  
N. Ahmad ◽  
A. Borkent ◽  
I. Meuche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Ecology ◽  
Interaction Networks ◽  
Biting Midges ◽  
Ecological Interaction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document