scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Inferior to Superior Capsular Shift in Lateral Decubitus Position

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e145-e150
Author(s):  
Andrew Buckley ◽  
Ivan Wong
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Capsular Shift ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Knotless Anchors in the Lateral Decubitus Position

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bruce ◽  
Anil Gupta ◽  
Kristen Hussey ◽  
Davietta Butty ◽  
Brian J. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

scholarly journals Comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes of three procedures for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: arthroscopic Bankart repair, capsular shift, and open Latarjet

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjie Xu ◽  
Kailun Wu ◽  
Qianli Ma ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Subjective Perception ◽  
Capsular Shift ◽  
Shift Group ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Abstract Background Best surgical of recurrent anterior shoulder instability remained controversial. We knew little about the superiority and choice between traditional open and modern arthroscopic techniques. We hypothesized that outcomes of all patients will be similar regardless of surgical technique. Methods A retrospective case-cohort analysis of 168 patients who had recurrent anterior shoulder instability was conducted from September 2010 to December 2013. All cases (mean age 30.8 [range 18–50] years) were performed with arthroscopic Bankart repair (33 males/20 females), open Latarjet (34 males/18 females), and capsular shift (31 males/14 females). The average follow-up was 67.6 months (range 60–72). The shoulder instability index score (ISIS) was more than 3 with an average of 6.4. Results All treatments proved to be effective in improving shoulder functional status and reducing symptoms, while Latarjet had an advantage over subjective perception. The Rowe scores in arthroscopic Bankart, open Latarjet, and capsular shift group were 92.3 ± 1.5, 96.2 ± 2.1, and 93.2 ± 2.3, respectively, with significant difference. There was no significant difference in other functional outcomes. However, the Latarjet group in subjective results (subjective shoulder value (SSV) and subjective shoulder value for sport practice (SSV Sport)) was superior to the others (P < 0.05). There were two relapsed cases in arthroscopic Bankart and capsular shift group, respectively, and no recurrence in open Latarjet group. Conclusion Arthroscopic Bankart repair has the advantage of mini-invasion and rapid recovery. Capsular shift offers stabilizing of inferior or multidirectional type, especially for little bone defect. Latarjet was more effective in reducing recurrence with higher stability. Level of evidence Therapeutic level III

scholarly journals The Use of Accessory Portals in Bankart Repair With Posterior Extension in the Lateral Decubitus Position

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e1121-e1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Jason T. Hamamoto ◽  
Kevin J. Campbell ◽  
Mark McCarthy ◽  
John D. Higgins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Posterior Extension ◽  
Lateral Decubitus

Surgical Techniques for Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy at the Left Lateral Decubitus Position

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
H. Sato ◽  
Y. Miyawaki ◽  
N. Fujiwara ◽  
H. Sugita ◽  
M. Aikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy ◽  
Left Lateral Decubitus Position ◽  
Lateral Decubitus
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document