scholarly journals Bipolar Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Joint Reconstruction for Patellar and Trochlear Cartilage Defects

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e1533-e1541
Author(s):  
Omid Jalali ◽  
Zachary Vredenburgh ◽  
John Prodromo ◽  
Neilen Benvegnu ◽  
George Frederick “Rick” Hatch
Keyword(s):  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Joint Reconstruction ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Fresh Osteochondral Allograft

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0038
Author(s):  
Gregory F. Pereira ◽  
John Steele ◽  
Amanda N. Fletcher ◽  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Ryan B. Clement
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Survival Rate ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Fresh Osteochondral Allograft

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The term osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) refers to any pathology of the talar articular cartilage and corresponding subchondral bone. In general, OLTs can pose a formidable treatment challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon due to the poor intrinsic ability of cartilage to heal as well as the tenuous vascular supply to the talus. Although many treatment options exist, including microfracture, retrograde drilling, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) these options may be inadequate to treat large cartilage lesions. Osteochondral allografts have demonstrated promise as the primary treatment for OLTs with substantial cartilage and bone involvement. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of outcomes after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for OLTs. Methods: PudMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Medline were searched using PRISMA guidelines. Studies that evaluated outcomes in adult patients after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for chondral defects of the talus were included. Operative results, according to standardized scoring systems, such as the AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot scale and the Visual Analog Scale were compared across various studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Coleman methodology score. Results: There were a total of 12 eligible studies reporting on 191 patients with OLTs with an average follow-up of 56.8 months (range 6-240). The mean age was 37.5 (range 17-74) years and the overall graft survival rate was 86.6%. The AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot score was obtained pre- and postoperatively in 6 of the 12 studies and had significant improvements in each (P<0.05). Similarly, the VAS pain score was evaluated in 5 of the 12 studies and showed significant decreases (P<0.05) from pre- to postoperatively with an aggregate mean preoperative VAS score of 7.3 and an aggregate postoperative value of 2.6. The reported short-term complication rate was 0%. The overall failure rate was 13.4% and 21.6% percent of patients had subsequent procedures. Conclusion: The treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus remains a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. From this systematic review, one can conclude that osteochondral allograft transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus results in predictably favorable outcomes with an impressive graft survival rate and high satisfaction rates at intermediate follow-up. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee in Patients with an Elevated Body Mass Index

Cartilage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Wang ◽  
Brian J. Rebolledo ◽  
David M. Dare ◽  
Mollyann D. Pais ◽  
Matthew R. Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Short Form ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Elevated Body Mass Index ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Patient Responses

Objective To characterize the graft survivorship and clinical outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the knee in patients with an elevated body mass index (BMI). Design Prospective data on 38 consecutive patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 treated with OCA from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Complications, reoperations, and patient responses to validated outcome measures were examined. Failures were defined by any removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to arthroplasty. Results Thirty-one knees in 31 patients (mean age, 35.4 years [range, 17-61 years]; 87% male) met the inclusion criteria. Mean BMI was 32.9 kg/m2 (range, 30-39 kg/m2). Mean chondral defect size was 6.4 cm2 (range, 1.0-15.3 cm2). Prior to OCA, 23 patients (74%) had undergone previous surgery to the ipsilateral knee. Mean duration of follow-up was 4.1 years (range, 2-11 years). After OCA, 5 knees (13%) underwent conversion to unicompartmental (1) or total (4) knee arthroplasty. Two- and 5-year graft survivorship were 87% and 83%, respectively. At final follow-up, clinically significant improvements were noted in the pain (49.3-72.6) and physical functioning (52.9-81.3) subscales of the Short Form–36 ( P ≤ 0.001), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (43.5-67.0; P = 0.002), Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living (58.2-80.4; P = 0.002), and overall condition subscale of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (4.7-6.9; P = 0.046). Conclusions OCA can be a successful midterm treatment option for focal cartilage defects of the knee in select patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2.

scholarly journals Fresh Allograft Replacement for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0013
Author(s):  
Samuel Adams ◽  
Nicholas Allen ◽  
James Nunley ◽  
Mark Easley
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Subchondral Bone ◽  
Bone Destruction ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Normal Cartilage ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Fresh Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Allografts

Category: Basic Sciences/Biologics Introduction/Purpose: Large osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) can be difficult to treat. Although many treatment options exist, fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation has demonstrated promise as the primary treatment for OLTs with substantial cartilage and bone involvement as well as a secondary treatment option after failure of other cartilage repair techniques. Fresh osteochondral allografts are size-matched from organ donors and, in theory, have healthy articular cartilage and bone. However, the quality of allograft cartilage and bone has never been examined with respect to the OLT cartilage and bone being replaced. The purpose of this study was to perform a matched comparison of the cartilage and bone from patients OLTs to the fresh osteochondral allograft replacement. Methods: Discarded intact osteochondral specimens were collected from 8 patients undergoing surgery for an OLT. The specimens included the excised OLT and a portion of the fresh allograft replacement that the same patient received at the time of surgery. Histologic analysis was performed. The safranin-o histology was then scored using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) histopathology grading and staging system. In this system the grade determines cartilage and bone destruction on a scale of 0 to 6.5, the stage determines the percentage of involvement in the specimen on a scale of 0 to 4, and the total score is the grade multiplied by the stage. The surface roughness was also compared between the OLT and allograft cartilage using ImageJ software (NIH). Paired t-tests were performed on the ICRS grade, stage, and total score, and surface roughness comparing the OLTs and allografts. Significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Gross histological inspection of the samples demonstrated cartilage erosion and subchondral bone destruction in the OLTs. In constrast, the osteochondral allografts demonstrated intact cartilage surface and normal subchondral bone in the allografts (Figure 1). The ICRS grade, stage, and total score were significantly higher in the implanted allografts compared to the resected OLTs (Figure 2); indicating better cartilage and bone morphology for the allografts compared to the OLTs. In fact, the mean grade and stage for the allograft samples were both less than a score of 1 which corresponds to healthy cartilage and bone with less than 10% surface fibrillations. Moreover, the surface roughness of the allograft cartilage was significantly smoother than the OLT cartilage. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate that the use of fresh allograft transplantation for the treatment of OLTs replaces the damaged cartilage and bone with normal or near normal cartilage and bone. The replacement of damaged cartilage and subchondral bone with normal or near normal cartilage and bone may be the reason for improved pain relief and functional outcomes after fresh allograft transplantation for OLTs.

Osteochondral Defects of the Talus Treated with Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Edward Gross ◽  
Zoe Agnidis ◽  
Carol Rose Hutchison
Keyword(s):  
Open Fracture ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Motor Vehicle Accident ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Defects ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Vehicle Accident ◽  
Fresh Osteochondral Allograft

Between 1980 and 1996, 9 patients with osteocartilagenous lesions of the talus were treated surgically using fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation. In 8 cases the reason for surgery was osteochondritis dissecans (4 of these cases had a previous traumatic injury). In 1 case a fresh osteochondral allograft of the talus was required following a traumatic open fracture of the talus sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Of these 9 grafts, 6 grafts remain in situ with a mean survival of 11 years (range 4 to 19). In the three cases requiring fusion the reason for surgery was not related to arthritic deterioration but due to resorption and fragmentation of the graft.

scholarly journals Outcomes Associated With Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in Dogs

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel P. Franklin ◽  
Aaron M. Stoker ◽  
Sean M. Murphy ◽  
Michael P. Kowaleski ◽  
Mitchell Gillick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Type Size ◽  
Successful Outcomes

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively characterize outcomes and complications associated with osteochondral allograft transplantation for treating chondral and osteochondral lesions in a group of client-owned dogs with naturally-occurring disease. Records were reviewed for information on signalment, treated joint, underlying pathology (e.g., osteochondritis dissecans; OCD), and type, size, and number of grafts used. Complications were classified as “trivial” if no treatment was provided, “non-surgical” if non-surgical treatment were needed, “minor surgical” if a minor surgical procedure such as pin removal were needed but the graft survived and function was acceptable, or “major” if the graft failed and revision surgery were needed. Outcomes were classified as unacceptable, acceptable, or full function. Thirty-five joints in 33 dogs were treated including nine stifles with lateral femoral condyle (LFC) OCD and 10 stifles with medial femoral condyle (MFC) OCD treated with osteochondral cylinders or “plugs.” There were 16 “complex” procedures of the shoulder, elbow, hip, stifle, and tarsus using custom-cut grafts. In total there were eight trivial complications, one non-surgical complication, two minor surgical complications, and five major complications for a total of 16/35 cases with complications. Accordingly, there were five cases with unacceptable outcomes, all of whom had major complications while the other 30 cases had successful outcomes. Of the 30 cases with successful outcomes, 15 had full function and 15 had acceptable function. Based on these subjective outcome assessments, it appears osteochondral allograft transplantation is a viable treatment option in dogs with focal or complex cartilage defects. However, no conclusions can be made regarding the inferiority or superiority of allograft transplantation in comparison to other treatment options based upon these data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document