scholarly journals Loop Biceps Tenotomy: An Arthroscopic Technique for Long Head of Biceps Tenotomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e427-e430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Noel Goubier ◽  
Thomas Bihel ◽  
Elodie Dubois ◽  
Frédéric Teboul
Keyword(s):  
Arthroscopic Technique ◽  
Long Head Of Biceps ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Long Head

scholarly journals Wide-Awake Shoulder Nanoscopic Long Head of Biceps Tenotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e909-e912
Author(s):  
Chris Peach ◽  
Ronnie Davies ◽  
Nick Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Long Head Of Biceps ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Wide Awake

scholarly journals An Arthroscopic Technique for Long Head of Biceps Tenodesis With Double Knotless Screw

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e375-e378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ren Su ◽  
Florence Y. Ling ◽  
Chih-Kai Hong ◽  
Chih-Hsun Chang ◽  
Kai-Chen Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Arthroscopic Technique ◽  
Long Head Of Biceps ◽  
Long Head

scholarly journals Arthroscopic isolated long head of biceps tenotomy in patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears: mid-term clinical results and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Egbert J. D. Veen ◽  
Ashvin V. Boeddha ◽  
Ronald L. Diercks ◽  
Ydo V. Kleinlugtenbelt ◽  
Ellie B. M. Landman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Long Head Of Biceps ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Acromiohumeral Distance ◽  
And Function

Abstract Introduction The long head of biceps tendon is frequently involved in degenerative rotator cuff tears. Therefore, this study explored the clinical results of an isolated biceps tenotomy and identified prognostic factors for improvement in pain and function. Materials and methods Between 2008 and 2017, an arthroscopic isolated biceps tenotomy was performed on 64 patients with a degenerative rotator cuff tear (> 65 years). Primary outcome was patient-perceived improvement in pain and function. Potential prognostic factors for improvement in pain and function were identified. Results A perceived improvement in pain was reported in 78% of the patients at three months after surgery and in 75% at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (1–7 years; n = 55). A perceived improvement in function was observed in 49% of patients at three months and in 76% of patients at follow-up. Patients with a preoperatively normal acromiohumeral distance (> 10 mm) reported an improvement in pain and function significantly more often. Retraction of the supraspinatus tendon Patte 3 was significantly associated with worse functional outcome. Conclusions A biceps tenotomy can be a reliable treatment option for patients with symptomatic degenerative cuff tears who fail conservative treatment and have a normal acromiohumeral distance (> 10 mm).

scholarly journals Long head of biceps tenotomy and tenodesis don’t affect elbow flexion and forearm supination strength

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 61-62
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Negi ◽  
Shin Yokoya ◽  
Yohei Harada ◽  
Katsunori Shiraishi ◽  
Ryo Matsushita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Long Head Of Biceps ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Supination Strength

scholarly journals Measurements of Tendon Movement Within the Bicipital Groove After Suprapectoral Intra-articular Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097753
Author(s):  
Brian J. Kelly ◽  
Alan W. Reynolds ◽  
Patrick J. Schimoler ◽  
Alexander Kharlamov ◽  
Mark Carl Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Bicipital Groove ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Scapular Motion

Background: Lesions of the long head of the biceps can be successfully treated with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis when surgical management is elected. The advantage of a tenodesis is that it prevents the potential development of a cosmetic deformity or cramping muscle pain. Proponents of a subpectoral tenodesis believe that “groove pain” may remain a problem after suprapectoral tenodesis as a result of persistent motion of the tendon within the bicipital groove. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove before and after a suprapectoral intra-articular tenodesis. The hypothesis was that there would be minimal to no motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove after tenodesis. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the long head of the biceps tendon as well as the bicipital groove. Inclinometers and fiducials (optical markers) were used to measure the motions of the scapula, forearm, and biceps tendon through a full range of shoulder and elbow motions. A suprapectoral biceps tenodesis was then performed, and the motions were repeated. The motion of the biceps tendon was quantified as a function of scapular or forearm motion in each plane, both before and after the tenodesis. Results: There was minimal motion of the native biceps tendon during elbow flexion and extension but significant motion during all planes of scapular motion before tenodesis, with the most motion occurring during shoulder flexion-extension (20.73 ± 8.21 mm). The motion of the biceps tendon after tenodesis was significantly reduced during every plane of scapular motion compared with the native state ( P < .01 in all planes of motion), with a maximum motion of only 1.57 mm. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant reduction in motion of the biceps tendon in all planes of scapular motion after the intra-articular biceps tenodesis. The motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove was essentially eliminated after the suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Clinical Relevance: This arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis technique can significantly reduce motion of the biceps tendon within the groove in this cadaveric study, possibly reducing the likelihood of groove pain in the clinical setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document