Coagulation parameters in patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis treated sequentially with low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1208-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando Tripodi ◽  
Massimo Primignani ◽  
Simon Braham ◽  
Veena Chantarangkul ◽  
Marigrazia Clerici ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Priyanka ◽  
J. T. Kupec ◽  
M. Krafft ◽  
N. A. Shah ◽  
G. J. Reynolds

Background. Newer oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are being utilized increasingly for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). NOAC use is the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of acute VTE involving extremities and pulmonary embolism. In contrast, most guidelines in the literature support the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Literature evaluating NOAC use in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis is sparse. This review focuses on the safety and efficacy of the use of NOACs in the treatment of acute PVT in patients, with or without concomitant cirrhosis, based on the most recent data available in the current literature. Methods. A systematic review was conducted through a series of advanced searches in the following medical databases: PubMed, BioMed Central, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Keywords utilized were as follows: NOAC, DOAC (direct oral anticoagulants), portal vein thrombosis, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban. Articles related to newer anticoagulant use in patients with portal vein thrombosis were included. Results. The adverse events, including bleeding events (major and minor) and the failure of anticoagulation (propagation of thrombus or recurrence of PVT), are similar between the NOACs and traditional anticoagulants for the treatment of acute PVT, irrespective of the presence of cirrhosis. Conclusions. Newer oral anticoagulants are safe and efficacious alternatives to traditional anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis with or without cirrhosis.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 901-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell D. Hull ◽  
Graham F. Pineo ◽  
Rollin F. Brant ◽  

Abstract Context: A substantial clinical need exists for an alternate to vitamin-K-antagonists for treating deep-vein thrombosis in many patients. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin, body-weight adjusted, avoids anticoagulant monitoring and may be associated with less harm due to bleeding. Objective: Considerable evidence suggests that reporting of harms-related data* from randomized clinical trials needs improvement. In accordance with CONSORT* we present a harm analysis regarding hemorrhagic complications. Design: Randomized clinical trial using objective outcome measures. Setting: 30 centres across Canada. Participants: Acute symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis patients. Intervention: Therapeutic tinzaparin subcutaneously once-daily, or usual-care intravenous unfractionated heparin/vitamin-K-antagonists for 3 months. Main Outcome Measures: Benefit was assessed by assessing the frequency of symptomatic objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism and harm by objectively documented hemorrhagic complications. Results: A broad-spectrum of patients was randomized. Of 737 patients, 18 of 369 receiving tinzaparin (4.9 percent) suffered recurrent venous thromboembolism at three months compared with 21 of 368 (5.7 percent) receiving usual-care; (absolute difference, −0.9 percent, 95 percent confidence interval −4.1 to 2.4). Hemorrhagic complications occurred less frequently in the low-molecular-weight heparin group; 48 of 369 patients, (13.0 percent) versus usual-care 73 of 368, (19.8 percent), (absolute difference −6.8 percent; p=0.011; risk ratio = 0.66). The prevalence of major bleeding according to the duration of study treatment favored low-molecular-weight heparin therapy. Major bleeding persisted throughout study treatment for patients in the usual-care group receiving warfarin but ceased early by day 23 in the low-molecular-weight heparin group (p=0.034). Twenty-five patients (6.8 percent) in the low-molecular-weight heparin group and 24 patients (6.5 percent) receiving usual-care died (absolute difference 0.3 percent, 95 percent confidence interval −3.4 to 3.9). Conclusion: Our findings are clinically relevant and important, offering the clinician an alternate therapy to vitamin-K-antagonist therapy which does not require anticoagulant monitoring in a wide range of patients with proximal venous thrombosis. Self-management with once-daily subcutaneous tinzaparin was at least as effective as usual-care and vitamin-K-antagonist therapy and offers a safety advantage with less harm due to bleeding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. e681
Author(s):  
Marco Senzolo ◽  
Salvatore Piano ◽  
David Sacerdoti ◽  
Silvia Tonello ◽  
Alberto Zanetto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document