Open access colonoscopy: Critical appraisal of indications, quality metrics and outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 940-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rony Ghaoui ◽  
Sheryl Ramdass ◽  
Jennifer Friderici ◽  
David J. Desilets
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Quality Metrics

Open Access Colonoscopy: Critical Appraisal of Indications, Quality Metrics, and Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S637-S639
Author(s):  
Sheryl Ramdass ◽  
Rony Ghaoui ◽  
Jennifer Friderici ◽  
David Desilets
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Quality Metrics

scholarly journals Recommendations for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality Metrics for Open Access Data (Corollary to the Amsterdam Principles)

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1412-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Kinsinger ◽  
James Apffel ◽  
Mark Baker ◽  
Xiaopeng Bian ◽  
Christoph H. Borchers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Metrics ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Open Access Data ◽  
Data Quality Metrics ◽  
Access Data

scholarly journals Recommendations for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality Metrics for Open Access Data (Corollary to the Amsterdam Principles)

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. O111.015446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Kinsinger ◽  
James Apffel ◽  
Mark Baker ◽  
Xiaopeng Bian ◽  
Christoph H. Borchers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Metrics ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Open Access Data ◽  
Data Quality Metrics ◽  
Access Data

scholarly journals Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

PROTEOMICS ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Kinsinger ◽  
James Apffel ◽  
Mark Baker ◽  
Xiaopeng Bian ◽  
Christoph H. Borchers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Metrics ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Open Access Data ◽  
Data Quality Metrics ◽  
Access Data

scholarly journals Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253129
Author(s):  
Allison Langham-Putrow ◽  
Caitlin Bakker ◽  
Amy Riegelman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Science Framework ◽  
Citation Advantage

Aims Over the last two decades, the existence of an open access citation advantage (OACA)—increased citation of articles made available open access (OA)—has been the topic of much discussion. While there has been substantial research to address this question, findings have been contradictory and inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review to compare studies of citations to OA and non-OA articles. Methods A systematic search of 17 databases attempted to capture all relevant studies authored since 2001. The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework. We included studies with a direct comparison between OA and non-OA items and reported article-level citation as an outcome. Both randomized and non-randomized studies were included. No limitations were placed on study design, language, or publication type. Results A total of 5,744 items were retrieved. Ultimately, 134 items were identified for inclusion. 64 studies (47.8%) confirmed the existence of OACA, while 37 (27.6%) found that it did not exist, 32 (23.9%) found OACA only in subsets of their sample, and 1 study (0.8%) was inconclusive. Studies with a focus on multiple disciplines were significantly positively associated with finding that OACA exists in subsets, and are less associated with finding that OACA did not exist. In the critical appraisal of the included studies, 3 were found to have an overall low risk of bias. Of these, one found that an OACA existed, one found that it did not, and one found that an OACA occurred in subsets. Conclusions As seen through the large number of studies identified for this review, OACA is a topic of continuing interest. Quality and heterogeneity of the component studies pose challenges for generalization. The results suggest the need for reporting guidelines for bibliometrics studies.

scholarly journals Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 580-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Kinsinger ◽  
James Apffel ◽  
Mark Baker ◽  
Xiaopeng Bian ◽  
Christoph H. Borchers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Metrics ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Open Access Data ◽  
Data Quality Metrics ◽  
Access Data

scholarly journals Four strategies to find, evaluate, and engage with online resources in emergency medicine

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Lo ◽  
Eric Shappell ◽  
Hans Rosenberg ◽  
Brent Thoma ◽  
James Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Educational Resources ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Online Resources ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Online Educational Resources ◽  
Effective Use

AbstractDespite the rapid expansion of online educational resources for emergency medicine, barriers remain to their effective use by emergency physicians and trainees. This article expands on previous descriptions of techniques to aggregate online educational resources, outlining four strategies to help learners navigate, evaluate, and contribute online. These strategies include 1) cultivating digital mentors, 2) browsing the most popular free open access medical education (FOAM) websites, 3) using critical appraisal tools developed for FOAM, and 4) contributing new online content.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document