scholarly journals Genetic Fate Mapping of Transient Cell Fate Reveals N-Cadherin Activity and Function in Tumor Metastasis

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-607.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Zan Lv ◽  
Shaohua Zhang ◽  
Zhuo Wang ◽  
Lingjuan He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Tumor Metastasis ◽  
Fate Mapping ◽  
And Function

scholarly journals Cadherins in early neural development

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Punovuori ◽  
Mattias Malaguti ◽  
Sally Lowell
Keyword(s):  
Adhesion Molecules ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Development ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Directed Differentiation ◽  
Culture Dish ◽  
Cell Identity ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Neural Tissues ◽  
And Function

AbstractDuring early neural development, changes in signalling inform the expression of transcription factors that in turn instruct changes in cell identity. At the same time, switches in adhesion molecule expression result in cellular rearrangements that define the morphology of the emerging neural tube. It is becoming increasingly clear that these two processes influence each other; adhesion molecules do not simply operate downstream of or in parallel with changes in cell identity but rather actively feed into cell fate decisions. Why are differentiation and adhesion so tightly linked? It is now over 60 years since Conrad Waddington noted the remarkable "Constancy of the Wild Type” (Waddington in Nature 183: 1654–1655, 1959) yet we still do not fully understand the mechanisms that make development so reproducible. Conversely, we do not understand why directed differentiation of cells in a dish is sometimes unpredictable and difficult to control. It has long been suggested that cells make decisions as 'local cooperatives' rather than as individuals (Gurdon in Nature 336: 772–774, 1988; Lander in Cell 144: 955–969, 2011). Given that the cadherin family of adhesion molecules can simultaneously influence morphogenesis and signalling, it is tempting to speculate that they may help coordinate cell fate decisions between neighbouring cells in the embryo to ensure fidelity of patterning, and that the uncoupling of these processes in a culture dish might underlie some of the problems with controlling cell fate decisions ex-vivo. Here we review the expression and function of cadherins during early neural development and discuss how and why they might modulate signalling and differentiation as neural tissues are formed.

scholarly journals Mechanosensation and Mechanotransduction by Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Act as Important Regulators of Lymphatic Development and Function

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 3955
Author(s):  
László Bálint ◽  
Zoltán Jakus
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Mechanical Forces ◽  
Lymphatic Endothelial Cells ◽  
Lymphatic Development ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Impact

Our understanding of the function and development of the lymphatic system is expanding rapidly due to the identification of specific molecular markers and the availability of novel genetic approaches. In connection, it has been demonstrated that mechanical forces contribute to the endothelial cell fate commitment and play a critical role in influencing lymphatic endothelial cell shape and alignment by promoting sprouting, development, maturation of the lymphatic network, and coordinating lymphatic valve morphogenesis and the stabilization of lymphatic valves. However, the mechanosignaling and mechanotransduction pathways involved in these processes are poorly understood. Here, we provide an overview of the impact of mechanical forces on lymphatics and summarize the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the mechanosensation and mechanotransduction by lymphatic endothelial cells. We also discuss how these mechanosensitive pathways affect endothelial cell fate and regulate lymphatic development and function. A better understanding of these mechanisms may provide a deeper insight into the pathophysiology of various diseases associated with impaired lymphatic function, such as lymphedema and may eventually lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets for these conditions.

scholarly journals The Evolving Roles of Cardiac Macrophages in Homeostasis, Regeneration, and Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 7923
Author(s):  
Santiago Alvarez-Argote ◽  
Caitlin C. O’Meara
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Injury ◽  
Cardiac Regeneration ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Cardiac Conduction ◽  
Cell Detection ◽  
Fate Mapping ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Macrophage Populations ◽  
And Function

Macrophages were first described as phagocytic immune cells responsible for maintaining tissue homeostasis by the removal of pathogens that disturb normal function. Historically, macrophages have been viewed as terminally differentiated monocyte-derived cells that originated through hematopoiesis and infiltrated multiple tissues in the presence of inflammation or during turnover in normal homeostasis. However, improved cell detection and fate-mapping strategies have elucidated the various lineages of tissue-resident macrophages, which can derive from embryonic origins independent of hematopoiesis and monocyte infiltration. The role of resident macrophages in organs such as the skin, liver, and the lungs have been well characterized, revealing functions well beyond a pure phagocytic and immunological role. In the heart, recent research has begun to decipher the functional roles of various tissue-resident macrophage populations through fate mapping and genetic depletion studies. Several of these studies have elucidated the novel and unexpected roles of cardiac-resident macrophages in homeostasis, including maintaining mitochondrial function, facilitating cardiac conduction, coronary development, and lymphangiogenesis, among others. Additionally, following cardiac injury, cardiac-resident macrophages adopt diverse functions such as the clearance of necrotic and apoptotic cells and debris, a reduction in the inflammatory monocyte infiltration, promotion of angiogenesis, amelioration of inflammation, and hypertrophy in the remaining myocardium, overall limiting damage extension. The present review discusses the origin, development, characterization, and function of cardiac macrophages in homeostasis, cardiac regeneration, and after cardiac injury or stress.

PIN-FORMED 1 regulates cell fate at the periphery of the shoot apical meristem

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (23) ◽  
pp. 5157-5165 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Vernoux ◽  
J. Kronenberger ◽  
O. Grandjean ◽  
P. Laufs ◽  
J. Traas
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Apical Meristem ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Hybrid Identity ◽  
Hormone Transport ◽  
Early Markers ◽  
Ideal Tool ◽  
And Function

The process of organ positioning has been addressed, using the pin-formed 1 (pin1) mutant as a tool. PIN1 is a transmembrane protein involved in auxin transport in Arabidopsis. Loss of function severely affects organ initiation, and pin1 mutants are characterised by an inflorescence meristem that does not initiate any flowers, resulting in the formation of a naked inflorescence stem. This phenotype, combined with the proposed role of PIN1 in hormone transport, makes the mutant an ideal tool to study organ formation and phyllotaxis, and here we present a detailed analysis of the molecular modifications at the shoot apex caused by the mutation. We show that meristem structure and function are not severely affected in the mutant. Major alterations, however, are observed at the periphery of the pin1 meristem, where organ initiation should occur. Although two very early markers of organ initiation, LEAFY and AINTEGUMENTA, are expressed at the periphery of the mutant meristem, the cells are not recruited into distinct primordia. Instead a ring-like domain expressing those primordium specific genes is observed around the meristem. This ring-like domain also expresses a boundary marker, CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON 2, involved in organ separation, showing that the zone at the meristem periphery has a hybrid identity. This implies that PIN1 is not only involved in organ outgrowth, but that it is also necessary for organ separation and positioning. A model is presented in which PIN1 and the local distribution of auxin control phyllotaxis.

scholarly journals Multilevel regulation of the glass locus during Drosophila eye development

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Fritsch ◽  
F. Javier Bernardo-Garcia ◽  
Tim-Henning Humberg ◽  
Sara Miellet ◽  
Silvia Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Eye Development ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Protein Isoforms ◽  
Critical Feature ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Temporal Gene Expression ◽  
And Function

ABSTRACTDevelopment of eye tissue is initiated by a conserved set of transcripton factors termed retinal determination network (RDN). In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, the zinc-finger transcription factor Glass acts directly downstream of the RDN to control idendity of photoreceptor as well as non-photoreceptors cells. Tight control of spatial and temporal gene expression is a critical feature during development, cell-fate determination as well as maintainance of differentiated tissues. The molecular mechanisms that control expression of glass, however remain largely unknown. We here identify complex regulatory mechanisms controlling expression of the glass locus. All information to recapitulate glass expression are contained in a compact 5.2 kb cis-acting genomic element by combining different cell-type specific and general enhancers with repressor elements. Moreover, the immature RNA of the locus contains an alterantive small open reading frame (smORF) upstream of the actual glass translation start, resulting in a small peptide instead of the three possible glass protein isoforms. CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis shows that the smORF is not required for the formation of functioning photoreceptors, but to attenuate effects of glass misexpression. Furthermore, editing the genome to generate glass loci eliminating either one or two isoforms shows that only one of the three proteins is critical for formation of functioning photoreceptors, while removing the two other isoforms did not cause defects in developmental or photoreceptor function. Our results show that eye development and function is surprisingly robust and appears buffered to targeted manipulations of critical features of the glass transcript, suggesting a strong selection pressure to allow the formation of a functioning eye.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document