scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic bladder cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Vincenzo Di Nunno ◽  
Marta Cubelli ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Michelangelo Fiorentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic bladder cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (S4) ◽  
pp. S720-S732
Author(s):  
Marta Cubelli ◽  
Vincenzo Di Nunno ◽  
Karim Rihawi ◽  
Francesco Massari
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer

Circulating cellular biomarkers associated with delayed time to progression among bladder cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Vadim S Koshkin ◽  
Terence W. Friedlander ◽  
Patricia Li ◽  
Joseph Schonhoft ◽  
Rachel Krupa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Significant Trend ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer ◽  
Delayed Time

398 Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are an important emerging biomarker in bladder cancer that allow for a minimally invasive assessment of tumor activity and response to treatment. Characterization of CTC and other single cell populations associated with improved clinical outcomes can help guide treatment recommendations for patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic bladder cancer who received treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents were enrolled in this study. Patient response to treatment was assessed by treating physicians according to RECIST v1.1. Blood samples were prospectively collected from patients prior to the initiation of therapy and then while on treatment and shipped to Epic Sciences for processing. All nucleated cells were subjected to immunofluorescent (IF) staining and CTC and leukocyte identification by fluorescent scanners using algorithmic analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to compare time to progression of patients whose CTC and leukocyte values were above and below several pre-determined parameters. Results: A total of 27 patients (median age 74 years, 70% male) were enrolled in this study and were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents pembrolizumab (n=15), atezolizumab (n=11), or nivolumab (n=1). For 20 patients who had evaluable responses, objective response rate (ORR) was 2/20 (10%), all partial responses; another 5/20 (35%) had stable disease. Increased CD4% (>8% of total leukocytes) was associated with delayed time to progression (TTP) (p=0.002) whereas increased baseline total CTCs (>2) had a statistically non-significant trend towards shorter TTP (p=0.09). Baseline CD8%, CD4/CD8 ratio and CTC PD-L1 status were not associated with TTP. Conclusions: In a preliminary analysis among metastatic bladder cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, patients with an increased baseline CTC count had a statistically non-significant trend towards shorter TTP whereas increased baseline CD4 cells had an association with delayed TTP. This prospective study is ongoing, and the results will be further validated in larger patient cohorts.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Bladder and Kidney Cancer: Responses and Further Management

2021 ◽  
pp. e182-e189
Author(s):  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
Thomas Powles
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have an established role in the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic kidney cancer. Treatment regimens combining nivolumab plus ipilimumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib have demonstrated superior overall survival compared with sunitinib in randomized studies. Response rates vary from 42% to 71.1% with these combinations. Atezolizumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic bladder cancer. These and other checkpoint inhibitors have been studied in metastatic bladder cancer and are routinely used after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. Durable responses are observed in bladder and kidney cancer. Although some patients may experience immune-related adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation, a portion of these patients will continue to experience a response off-therapy. At the time of progression, patients with metastatic kidney cancer may be treated with antiangiogenesis agents, and there are data suggesting that they may also be treated with a rechallenge of immunotherapy. In patients with metastatic bladder cancer who have progression after immune checkpoint inhibition, there are considerable data supporting the use of enfortumab vedotin. Ongoing studies are evaluating novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other agents; thus, the treatment landscape of metastatic bladder and kidney cancer is expected to continue to evolve rapidly.

scholarly journals Perioperative Systemic Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 7201
Author(s):  
In-Ho Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Radical cystectomy is the primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer; however, approximately 50% of patients develop metastatic disease within 2 years of diagnosis, which results in dismal prognosis. Therefore, systemic treatment is important to improve the prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Currently, several guidelines recommend cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients who have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Owing to their clinical benefits, several immune checkpoint inhibitors, with or without other agents (including other immunotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and emerging agents such as antibody drug conjugates), are being extensively investigated in perioperative settings. Several studies for perioperative immunotherapy have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors have promising efficacy with relatively low toxicity, and have explored the predictive molecular biomarkers. Herein, we review the current evidence and discuss the future perspectives of perioperative systemic treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

RNF43 mutations to predict survival from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and are associated with a high tumor mutation burden in bladder cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16528-e16528
Author(s):  
Liping Li ◽  
Mengmei Yang ◽  
Mengli Huang
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Tumor Mutation Burden ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
The Impact

e16528 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/L1 have been approved as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients and as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Biomarkers can help select patients who are more likely to response to ICIs. RNF43 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that acts as a negative regulator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. In colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), RNF43 mutations predicted longer overall survival (OS). The impact of RNF43 mutations on the efficiency of ICIs in bladder cancer(BLC) remains to be explored. Methods: We downloaded the mutation and clinical data of 211 BLC patients treated with ICIs from the immunotherapeutic cohort published by Samstein et al. (2019). OS analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison of TMB. We also downloaded a TCGA cohort for prognostic analysis. The correlations between RNF43 and immune infiltrates were analyzed in the TIMER2.0 database. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05. Results: RNF43 mutations were identified in 4.3%(9/211) and 3%(13/438) BLC patients in the immunotherapeutic and TCGA cohort, respectively. In the immunotherapeutic cohort, patients with RNF43 mutations had significantly longer OS (25 months vs 8 months; p = 0.015) and higher tumor mutation burden(TMB, 42.3 vs 7.9; p = 3.15E-06) than RNF43-wild-type patients. Different from this, no significant difference was found in OS between RNF43-mutant and RNF43-wild-type BLC patients with standard treatment in the TCGA cohort (p = 0.696). These results indicated that RNF43 was not a prognostic factor but a predictive biomarker of survival in BLC treated with ICIs. No difference was observed in subsets of immune cells between RNF43-mutant and the RNF43-wide-type BLC patients, including neutrophils, macrophages, CD8+ T cells, Tregs, B cells and NK cells. Conclusions: RNF43 mutations may be a predictor of survival benefit from ICIs in bladder cancer and correlated with higher TMB. Further studies in other ICI-treated cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Urothelial carcinoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Khalife ◽  
Claude Chahine ◽  
Manal Kordahi ◽  
Tony Felefly ◽  
Hampig Raphael Kourie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Bladder cancer is the seventh most frequent cancer worldwide. The majority of patients present with nonmuscle invasive disease, while 20% of the patients are diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The treatment of nonmuscle invasive disease is endoscopic resection followed by intravesical adjuvant treatment for high risk patients. The standard treatment of localized muscle-invasive disease is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma as second-line treatment or first-line in platinum-ineligible patients. Recently, pembrolizumab have been approved in BCG-refractory nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. This review summarizes the current evidence concerning immunotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy in bladder cancer: biological opportunity or clinical utility?

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110616
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Gianluca Perego ◽  
Ivano Vavassori ◽  
Andrea Luciani
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Of The Bladder ◽  
Muscle Invasive

In urothelial cancer of the bladder, the introduction of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors represents progress in the management of the disease’s early and advanced stages. In particular, recent studies have implemented these drugs in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases to treat muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In some studies, patients received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors alone (PURE and ABACUS) to treat muscle invasive bladder cancer, whereas other studies provided this therapy to cisplatin-ineligible patients. Furthermore, a large Phase III study (CheckMate 247) compared placebo with adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with high-risk urothelial cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or surgery alone. Despite some uncertain niches (nonbladder, PD-L1-negative tumors, and node-negative resected cancers), certain biological opportunities (exploring new targets, evaluating in vivo pathologic response, focusing on biomarkers for response) and clinical uses (avoiding chemotherapy at all or in frail patients, attaining similar pathologic complete response rates as in cisplatin-based chemotherapy) are valid reasons for incorporating these agents into the therapeutic armamentarium of medical uro-oncologists.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Bladder Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 435-443
Author(s):  
Sanchia S. Goonewardene ◽  
Karen Ventii ◽  
Amit Bahl ◽  
Raj Persad ◽  
Hanif Motiwala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document