Current and emerging concepts in non-invasive and minimally invasive management of spine metastasis

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aashish D. Bhatt ◽  
John C. Schuler ◽  
Maxwell Boakye ◽  
Shiao Y. Woo
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spine Metastasis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Invasive Management

scholarly journals Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Management of Low Back Disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. e111-e138
Author(s):  
Kurt T. Hegmann ◽  
Russell Travis ◽  
Gunnar B.J. Andersson ◽  
Roger M. Belcourt ◽  
Eugene J. Carragee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Back Disorders ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Low Back Disorders ◽  
Invasive Management

scholarly journals Holistic description of new deep sea megafauna (Cephalopoda: Cirrata) using a minimally invasive approach

BMC Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Ziegler ◽  
Christina Sagorny
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Dna Barcoding ◽  
Deep Sea ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Structural Complexity ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Additional Support ◽  
Holistic Description

Abstract Background In zoology, species descriptions conventionally rely on invasive morphological techniques, frequently leading to damage of the specimens and thus only a partial understanding of their structural complexity. More recently, non-destructive imaging techniques have successfully been used to describe smaller fauna, but this approach has so far not been applied to identify or describe larger animal species. Here, we present a combination of entirely non-invasive as well as minimally invasive methods that permit taxonomic descriptions of large zoological specimens in a more comprehensive manner. Results Using the single available representative of an allegedly novel species of deep-sea cephalopod (Mollusca: Cephalopoda), digital photography, standardized external measurements, high-field magnetic resonance imaging, micro-computed tomography, and DNA barcoding were combined to gather all morphological and molecular characters relevant for a full species description. The results show that this specimen belongs to the cirrate octopod (Octopoda: Cirrata) genus Grimpoteuthis Robson, 1932. Based on the number of suckers, position of web nodules, cirrus length, presence of a radula, and various shell characters, the specimen is designated as the holotype of a new species of dumbo octopus, G. imperator sp. nov. The digital nature of the acquired data permits a seamless online deposition of raw as well as derived morphological and molecular datasets in publicly accessible repositories. Conclusions Using high-resolution, non-invasive imaging systems intended for the analysis of larger biological objects, all external as well as internal morphological character states relevant for the identification of a new megafaunal species were obtained. Potentially harmful effects on this unique deep-sea cephalopod specimen were avoided by scanning the fixed animal without admixture of a contrast agent. Additional support for the taxonomic placement of the new dumbo octopus species was obtained through DNA barcoding, further underlining the importance of combining morphological and molecular datasets for a holistic description of zoological specimens.

scholarly journals The Minimally Invasive Management of Visceral Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1071
Author(s):  
Grant T. Fankhauser ◽  
William M. Stone ◽  
Sailendra G. Naidu ◽  
Gustavo S. Oderich ◽  
Joseph J. Ricotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Visceral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Invasive Management

Comparison of minimally invasive and non-invasive systems in lengthening total femoral prostheses

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1640-1646 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Medellin ◽  
T. Fujiwara ◽  
R. Clark ◽  
L. M. Jeys
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Leg Length Discrepancy ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Length Discrepancy ◽  
The Mean

AimsThe aim of this study was to describe, analyze, and compare the survival, functional outcome, and complications of minimally invasive (MI) and non-invasive (NI) lengthening total femoral prostheses.Patients and MethodsA total of 24 lengthening total femoral prostheses, 11 MI and 13 NI, were implanted between 1991 and 2016. The characteristics, complications, and functional results were recorded. There were ten female patients and ten male patients. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 11 years (2 to 41). The mean follow-up was 13.2 years (seven months to 29.25 years). A survival analysis was performed, and the failures were classified according to the Modified Henderson System.ResultsThe overall implant survival was 79% at five, ten, and 20 years for MI prostheses, and 84% at five years and 70% at ten years for NI prostheses. At the final follow-up, 13 prostheses did not require further surgery. The overall complication rate was 46%. The mean revision-free implant survival for MI and NI prostheses was 59 months and 49 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall implant survival, revision-free survival, or the distribution of complications between the two types of prosthesis. Infection rates were also comparable in the groups (9% vs 7%; p = 0.902). The rate of leg-length discrepancy was 54% in MI prostheses and 23% in NI prostheses. In those with a MI prosthesis, there was a smaller mean range of movement of the knee (0° to 62° vs 0° to 83°; p = 0.047), the flexion contracture took a longer mean time to resolve after lengthening (3.3 months vs 1.07 months; p < 0.001) and there was a lower mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score (24.7 vs 27; p = 0.295).ConclusionThe survival and complications of MI and NI lengthening total femoral prostheses are comparable. However, patients with NI prosthesis have more accurate correction of leg-length discrepancy, a better range of movement of the knee and an improved overall function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document