scholarly journals Telehealth allows for clinical trial participation and multimodality therapy in a rural patient with stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 139-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Clark ◽  
Laurence J. Heifetz ◽  
Daphne Palmer ◽  
Lisa M. Brown ◽  
David T. Cooke ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2031-2033
Author(s):  
Nilay Sengul Samanci ◽  
Emir Celik ◽  
Burak Akovalı ◽  
Sait Sager ◽  
Fuat Hulusi Demirelli

Introduction Ceritinib is a selective second-generation ALK inhibitor that is highly sensitive to echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) molecule. Case report In this paper, we report a 68-year-old female that was diagnosed with stage 4 ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Management and outcome: She was treated with crizotinib first-line, cisplatin and gemcitabine as second-line. And for third-line, ceritinib was started. She had complete response over 3.5 years under ceritinib treatment. And she is still receiving ceritinib with no adverse event. Discussion Cases achieving complete response with ceritinib treatment are rare. In this paper, we aimed to emphasize the complete response in stage 4 NSCLC in an elderly patient.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong M. Shin ◽  
Paul Y. Holoye ◽  
Arthur Forman ◽  
Rodger Winn ◽  
Roman Perez-Soler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Al-Baimani ◽  
H. Jonker ◽  
T. Zhang ◽  
G.D. Goss ◽  
S.A. Laurie ◽  
...  

Background Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) represents a major health issue globally. Systemic treatment decisions are informed by clinical trials, which, over years, have improved the survival of patients with advanced nsclc. The applicability of clinical trial results to the broad lung cancer population is unclear because strict eligibility criteria in trials generally select for optimal patients.Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients with advanced nsclc seen in outpatient consultation at our academic institution between September 2009 and September 2012, collecting data about patient demographics and cancer characteristics, treatment, and survival from hospital and pharmacy records. Two sets of arbitrary trial eligibility criteria were applied to the cohort. Scenario A stipulated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ecog ps) 0–1, no brain metastasis, creatinine less than 120 μmol/L, and no second malignancy. Less-strict scenario B stipulated ecog ps 0–2 and creatinine less than 120 μmol/L. We then used the two scenarios to analyze treatment and survival of patients by trial eligibility status.Results The 528 included patients had a median age of 67 years, with 55% being men and 58% having adenocarcinoma. Of those 528 patients, 291 received at least 1 line of palliative systemic therapy. Using the scenario A eligibility criteria, 73% were trial-ineligible. However, 46% of “ineligible” patients actually received therapy and experienced survival similar to that of the “eligible” treated patients (10.2 months vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.10). Using the scenario B criteria, only 35% were ineligible, but again, the survival of treated patients was similar in the ineligible and eligible groups (10.1 months vs. 10.9 months, p = 0.57).Conclusions Current trial eligibility criteria are often strict and limit the enrolment of patients in clinical trials. Our results suggest that, depending on the chosen drug, its toxicities and tolerability, eligibility criteria could be carefully reviewed and relaxed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J Solomon ◽  
Todd M Bauer ◽  
Filippo de Marinis ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
Yasushi Goto ◽  
...  

This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called CROWN. The study tested two medicines called lorlatinib and crizotinib in participants with untreated non-small cell lung cancer that had spread to other parts of their body. All those who took part had changes in a gene called ALK, which is involved in cell growth. In total, 296 participants from 23 countries took part. Half the participants took lorlatinib and half took crizotinib. After participants started taking lorlatinib or crizotinib, they were checked regularly to see if their tumors had grown or spread to other parts of their body (known as tumor progression) and to monitor any side effects. After 1 year of treatment, the participants who took lorlatinib were twice as likely to be alive with no tumor growth as the participants who took crizotinib. More participants who took lorlatinib had cancer that shrank (76%) compared with the participants who took crizotinib (58%). This was also true of the participants whose cancer had spread to their brain. The most common side effects in participants who took lorlatinib were increases in the amount of cholesterol and triglycerides (a type of fat) in their blood, swelling, weight gain, nerve damage, unclear thoughts, and diarrhea. Among the participants who took crizotinib, the most common side effects were diarrhea, feeling like you want to throw up, sight problems, swelling, vomiting, changes in liver function, and feeling tired. Overall, the CROWN study showed that fewer participants with advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer died or had tumor growth with lorlatinib compared with crizotinib treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT03052608 .


2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Agelaki ◽  
E. Kontopodis ◽  
A. Kotsakis ◽  
V. Chandrinos ◽  
I. Bompolaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document