Variety resistance to Cercospora leaf spot and fungicide application as tools of integrated pest management in sugar beet cultivation – A German case study

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 182-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annett Gummert ◽  
Erwin Ladewig ◽  
Klaus Bürcky ◽  
Bernward Märländer
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Leaf Spot ◽  
Cercospora Leaf Spot ◽  
Fungicide Application

A New Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Model for Cercospora Leaf Spot of Sugar Beets in the Po Valley, Italy

Sugar Tech ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Cioni ◽  
Marina Collina ◽  
Gianfranco Maines ◽  
Mohamed F. R. Khan ◽  
Gary A. Secor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Leaf Spot ◽  
Cercospora Leaf Spot ◽  
Sugar Beets ◽  
Po Valley

scholarly journals Future of Insecticide Seed Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 8792
Author(s):  
Milorad Vojvodić ◽  
Renata Bažok
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Seed Treatment ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Protective Measure ◽  
Lower Amount ◽  
Vegetable Crops ◽  
Good Efficacy ◽  
Active Substances

Seed treatment as a method of local application of pesticides in precise agriculture reduces the amount of pesticides used per unit area and is considered to be the safest, cheapest and most ecologically acceptable method of protecting seeds and young plants from pests in the early stages of their development. With the introduction of insecticides from the neonicotinoid group in the mid-1990s, the frequency of seed treatment increased. Due to suspected negative effects on pollinators, most of these insecticides are banned in the European Union. The ban has therefore led to a reduction in the number of active substances approved for seed treatment and to an increased re-use of active substances from the group of pyrethroids as well as other organophosphorus insecticides, which pose potentially very serious risks, perhaps even greater than those of the banned neonicotinoids. The objective of this review is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of seed treatment and the potential role of insecticide seed treatment in reducing the negative impact of pesticides on the environment. The main disadvantage of this method is that it has been widely accepted and has become a prophylactic protective measure applied to almost all fields. This is contrary to the principles of integrated pest management and leads to an increased input of insecticides into the environment, by treating a larger number of hectares with a lower amount of active ingredient, and a negative impact on beneficial entomofauna. In addition, studies show that due to the prophylactic approach, the economic and technical justification of this method is often questionable. Extremely important for a quality implementation are the correct processing and implementation of the treatment procedure as well as the selection of appropriate insecticides, which have proven to be problematic in the case of neonicotinoids. The ban on neonicotinoids and the withdrawal of seed treatments in oilseed rape and sugar beet has led to increased problems with a range of pests affecting these crops at an early stage of growth. The results of the present studies indicate good efficacy of active ingredients belonging to the group of anthranilic diamides, cyantraniliprole and chlorantraniliprole in the treatment of maize, soybean, sugar beet and rice seeds on pests of the above-ground part of the plant, but not on wireworms. Good efficacy in controlling wireworms in maize is shown by an insecticide in the naturalites group, spinosad, but it is currently used to treat seeds of vegetable crops, mainly onions, to control onion flies and flies on other vegetable crops. Seed treatment as a method only fits in with the principles of integrated pest management when treated seeds are sown on land where there is a positive prognosis for pest infestation.

Integrated pest management in post-harvest maize: a case study from the Republic of Togo (West Africa)

2002 ◽  
Vol 93 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 305-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Adda ◽  
C. Borgemeister ◽  
A. Biliwa ◽  
W.G. Meikle ◽  
R.H. Markham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
West Africa ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management ◽  
Post Harvest ◽  
The Republic

Genetic and biochemical variations among sugar beet cultivars resistant to Cercospora leaf spot

2020 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 101455
Author(s):  
Bahaa E.S. Abd El-Fatah ◽  
Mohamed Hashem ◽  
Kamal A.M. Abo-Elyousr ◽  
Hadeel M.M. Khalil Bagy ◽  
Saad A.M. Alamri
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Leaf Spot ◽  
Cercospora Leaf Spot

QTL analysis of Cercospora leaf spot resistance in sugar beet

1999 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. -O. Nilsson ◽  
M. Hansen ◽  
A. H. Panagopoulos ◽  
S. Tuvesson ◽  
M. Ehlde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Qtl Analysis ◽  
Leaf Spot ◽  
Cercospora Leaf Spot

scholarly journals 75% Adoption of Integrated Pest Management by 2000? A Case Study from New Jersey

1997 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
George C. Hamilton ◽  
Mark G. Robson ◽  
Gerald M. Ghidiu ◽  
Raymond Samulis ◽  
Eric Prostko
Keyword(s):  
New Jersey ◽  
Integrated Pest Management ◽  
Pest Management
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document