Design and formal security evaluation of NeMHIP: A new secure and efficient network mobility management protocol based on the Host Identity Protocol

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerea Toledo ◽  
Marivi Higuero ◽  
Jasone Astorga ◽  
Marina Aguado ◽  
Jean Marie Bonnin
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Security Evaluation ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Host Identity Protocol ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Host Identity ◽  
Mobility Management Protocol

Network Mobility

2012 ◽  
pp. 151-180
Author(s):  
Arijit Ukil
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Mobile Ip ◽  
Network Connectivity ◽  
Internet Access ◽  
Mobile Network ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Open Problems ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Mobility Management Protocol

Network mobility (NEMO) management is concerned about the mobility management of an entire wireless mobile network to provide uninterrupted network connectivity to many mobile devices moving together in the mobile network. This is particularly important for ubiquitous computing, which commonly means anytime, anywhere computing and communication. Most of the 3G and entire 4G and beyond wireless communication technology is all-IP. This growing use of IP devices in portable applications has created the demand for mobility support for entire networks of IP devices. NEMO solves this problem by extending Mobile IP. Devices on a mobile network are unaware of their network’s mobility; however, they are provided with uninterrupted Internet access even when the network changes its attachment point to the Internet. The main objective of NEMO is to provide continuous, optimal, and secure Internet access to all nodes and even recursively nested mobile sub-nets inside a moving network. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is engaged in standardizing NEMO Basic Support protocol that ensures uninterrupted connectivity to nodes within a mobile network via a mobile router. This protocol extends the mechanisms utilized in the host mobility management protocol Mobile IPv6. There are few open problems remain to be addressed in NEMO. In this chapter, we discuss about NEMO basic support protocols, its features, and other related issues.

Network Mobility Management in the ITS Context

2012 ◽  
pp. 205-241
Author(s):  
Nerea Toledo ◽  
Marivi Higuero
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Intelligent Transportation System ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Mobility Management Protocols ◽  
Host Mobility ◽  
Key Features ◽  
Mobility Management Protocol ◽  
The One ◽  
Selection Of

The proposals suggested so far can be can be classified in two different categories: on the one hand, NEMO solutions that consider MIPv6 as the base host mobility management protocol, and on the other hand, solutions that consider alternative base host mobility management protocols like SIP, LIN6, or HIP. Besides, a taxonomy on MIPv6 based NEMO protocols classifying them by considering which characteristics they aim to enhance is provided. It is important to point out that the selection of the base host mobility management protocol is fundamental to have as many demanded key features satisfied as possible by the NEMO protocol to be applied in the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) context.

Network Mobility

2011 ◽  
pp. 178-206
Author(s):  
Arijit Ukil
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Mobile Ip ◽  
Network Connectivity ◽  
Internet Access ◽  
Mobile Network ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Open Problems ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Mobility Management Protocol

Network mobility (NEMO) management is concerned about the mobility management of an entire wireless mobile network to provide uninterrupted network connectivity to many mobile devices moving together in the mobile network. This is particularly important for ubiquitous computing, which commonly means anytime, anywhere computing and communication. Most of the 3G and entire 4G and beyond wireless communication technology is all-IP. This growing use of IP devices in portable applications has created the demand for mobility support for entire networks of IP devices. NEMO solves this problem by extending Mobile IP. Devices on a mobile network are unaware of their network’s mobility; however, they are provided with uninterrupted Internet access even when the network changes its attachment point to the Internet. The main objective of NEMO is to provide continuous, optimal, and secure Internet access to all nodes and even recursively nested mobile sub-nets inside a moving network. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is engaged in standardizing NEMO Basic Support protocol that ensures uninterrupted connectivity to nodes within a mobile network via a mobile router. This protocol extends the mechanisms utilized in the host mobility management protocol Mobile IPv6. There are few open problems remain to be addressed in NEMO. In this chapter, we discuss about NEMO basic support protocols, its features, and other related issues.

scholarly journals Efficient Mobility Management Signalling in Network Mobility Supported PMIPV6

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Ananthi Jebaseeli Samuelraj ◽  
Sundararajan Jayapal
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Mobile Network ◽  
Access Point ◽  
Mobile Node ◽  
Support Network ◽  
Node Mobility ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Mobility Management Protocol

Proxy Mobile IPV6 (PMIPV6) is a network based mobility management protocol which supports node’s mobility without the contribution from the respective mobile node. PMIPV6 is initially designed to support individual node mobility and it should be enhanced to support mobile network movement. NEMO-BSP is an existing protocol to support network mobility (NEMO) in PMIPV6 network. Due to the underlying differences in basic protocols, NEMO-BSP cannot be directly applied to PMIPV6 network. Mobility management signaling and data structures used for individual node’s mobility should be modified to support group nodes’ mobility management efficiently. Though a lot of research work is in progress to implement mobile network movement in PMIPV6, it is not yet standardized and each suffers with different shortcomings. This research work proposes modifications in NEMO-BSP and PMIPV6 to achieve NEMO support in PMIPV6. It mainly concentrates on optimizing the number and size of mobility signaling exchanged while mobile network or mobile network node changes its access point.

Emerging Mobility Applications of Host Identity Protocol

2010 ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Szabolcs Nováczki ◽  
László Bokor ◽  
Gábor Jeney ◽  
Sándor Imre
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Host Identity Protocol ◽  
Ubiquitous Networks ◽  
Host Identity ◽  
Secure Network ◽  
Basic Ideas ◽  
Mobility Solution ◽  
Broad Scale

This chapter is devoted to give an overview of the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) and to discuss two different mobility management extensions built on it. We introduce the basic ideas and the main paradigms behind the HIP-scheme, and show its wild range usability in next generation mobile and ubiquitous networks. The broad scale of possible advanced mobility applications of HIP will be introduced based on two extensions of the protocol, both developed by the authors. The first one is a micromobility solution based on HIP (µHIP), while the second one provides a scalable and secure network mobility solution (HIP-NEMO).

scholarly journals Survey and Evaluation of Advanced Mobility Management Schemes in the Host Identity Layer

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Bokor ◽  
Zoltán Faigl ◽  
Sándor Imre
Keyword(s):  
Mobility Management ◽  
Mobile Internet ◽  
Cross Layer ◽  
Network Mobility ◽  
Simulation Evaluation ◽  
Management Scheme ◽  
Host Identity ◽  
Management Schemes ◽  
Basic Ideas ◽  
Survey And Evaluation

This paper is committed to give an overview of the Host Identity Protocol (HIP), to introduce the basic ideas and the main paradigms behind it, and to make an exhaustive survey of mobility management schemes in the Host Identity Layer. The authors' goal is to show how HIP emerges from the list of potential alternatives with its wild range of possible usability, complex feature set and power to create a novel framework for future Mobile Internet architectures. In order to achieve this, the authors also perform an extensive simulation evaluation of four selected mobility solutions in the Host Identity Layer: the standard HIP mobility/multihoming (RFC5206), a micromobility solution (µHIP), a network mobility management scheme (HIP-NEMO) and a proactive, cross-layer optimized, distributed proposal designed for flat architectures (UFA-HIP).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document