Cognitive brakes in interference resolution: A mouse-tracking and EEG co-registration study

Cortex ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 188-200
Author(s):  
Alessandra Tafuro ◽  
Antonino Vallesi ◽  
Ettore Ambrosini
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Tracking ◽  
Interference Resolution

Cognitive Processing of Miscommunication in Interactive Listening: An Evaluation of Listener Indecision and Cognitive Effort

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Roche ◽  
Arkady Zgonnikov ◽  
Laura M. Morett
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Processing ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Cognitive Effort ◽  
Mouse Tracking ◽  
Computer Mouse ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Computer Mouse Tracking ◽  
Listening Task ◽  
Processing Effort

Purpose The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the social and cognitive underpinnings of miscommunication during an interactive listening task. Method An eye and computer mouse–tracking visual-world paradigm was used to investigate how a listener's cognitive effort (local and global) and decision-making processes were affected by a speaker's use of ambiguity that led to a miscommunication. Results Experiments 1 and 2 found that an environmental cue that made a miscommunication more or less salient impacted listener language processing effort (eye-tracking). Experiment 2 also indicated that listeners may develop different processing heuristics dependent upon the speaker's use of ambiguity that led to a miscommunication, exerting a significant impact on cognition and decision making. We also found that perspective-taking effort and decision-making complexity metrics (computer mouse tracking) predict language processing effort, indicating that instances of miscommunication produced cognitive consequences of indecision, thinking, and cognitive pull. Conclusion Together, these results indicate that listeners behave both reciprocally and adaptively when miscommunications occur, but the way they respond is largely dependent upon the type of ambiguity and how often it is produced by the speaker.

Trainability and (Selective) Transferability of Interference- Resolution Skills

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika K. Hussey ◽  
J. Isaiah Harbison ◽  
Alan Mishler ◽  
Susan Teubner-Rhodes ◽  
Jared M. Novick
Keyword(s):  
Interference Resolution

A Study on Estimation of Aircraft Interference Resolution Procedure by Surveillance-Derived Flight Trajectory

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (0) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki KOZUKA ◽  
Yoshikazu MIYAZAWA ◽  
Navinda Kithmal WICKRAMASINGHE ◽  
Mark BROWN ◽  
Yutaka FUKUDA
Keyword(s):  
Flight Trajectory ◽  
Interference Resolution

Can Mouse-tracking Reveal Attribute Processing Speeds in Dietary Self-control? Commentary on Sullivan et al. (2015) and Lim et al. (2018) with A Simulation Study

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Martijn Willemsen ◽  
Daniel Lakens
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Study ◽  
Processing Speed ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Alternative Mechanism ◽  
Mouse Tracking ◽  
Tracking Method ◽  
Cognitive Mechanism ◽  
Speed Difference ◽  
Original Hypothesis

In this commentary, we re-examine the use of a mouse-tracking method for revealing attribute processing speed difference in dietary self-control (Sullivan et al. 2015; Lim et al., 2018). Through re-analyses of Sullivan et al. (2015)’s data and a simulation study, it can be shown that the attribute-angle correlations in the empirical data, which were used to estimate processing speeds, are attributed primarily to their common correlations with choice. The simulation study further suggests that when we account for the choice-mediated attribute-angle correlations, the data patterns used for supporting the original hypothesis can be produced by implementing a plausible alternative mechanism unrelated to processing speeds. The mouse-tracking method therefore fails to provide clear evidence for processing speed difference as a cognitive mechanism of self-control. Researchers should be cautious when using the mouse-tracking method to estimate attribute processing speeds.

scholarly journals Mouse tracking as a window into decision making

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 1085-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mora Maldonado ◽  
Ewan Dunbar ◽  
Emmanuel Chemla
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mouse Tracking

Disentangling Doubt and Checking Behaviors and Examining Their Association With Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms

2021 ◽  
pp. 216770262199386
Author(s):  
Asher Y. Strauss ◽  
Isaac Fradkin ◽  
Jonathan D. Huppert
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Tracking ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms ◽  
Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Null Results ◽  
Unobtrusive Measure ◽  
Compulsive Checking ◽  
Tone Discrimination ◽  
Neutral Conditions ◽  
The Relationship

Experiencing doubt in an uncertain situation has been theorized to be an antecedent of compulsive checking. However, whether and when obsessive compulsive (OC) symptoms are associated with experiencing doubt and increased checking is unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between OC symptoms, the experience of doubt, and checking in a tone-discrimination task. Doubt was measured using mouse tracking, an indirect, unobtrusive measure. The results of two studies ( N = 119) showed that OC symptoms were associated with elevated experiences of doubt when uncertainty was low. However, OC symptoms were not associated with increased checking, but doubt was. Results highlight the utility of mouse-tracking measures to capture the tendency of individuals with OC symptoms to experience doubt even under neutral conditions. The unexpected null results concerning checking suggest some specific directions for research to determine the conditions under which doubt evolves into checking in obsessive compulsive disorder.

Healthy eating decisions require efficient dietary self-control in children: A mouse-tracking food decision study

Appetite ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 575-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oh-Ryeong Ha ◽  
Amanda S. Bruce ◽  
Stephen W. Pruitt ◽  
J. Bradley C. Cherry ◽  
T. Ryan Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Mouse Tracking
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document