Robust neurocognitive individual differences in grammatical agreement processing: A latent variable approach

Cortex ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 210-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren Tanner
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren Tanner

Many neurocognitive accounts of language processing presume that neural responses detected in grand mean analyses of cortical electrophysiological activity reflect the normative brain response in the population under investigation. However, emerging work now shows that individuals’ brain responses can vary systematically in both the size and type of effect elicited. The present research therefore examined individual differences in neural activity elicited by grammatical agreement anomalies during language comprehension in a large cohort of highly literate, monolingual English speakers (N = 114), a population generally assumed to be relatively homogenous in terms of linguistic knowledge and processing. Results showed systematic variability in event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by subject-verb agreement anomalies, with brain responses varying on a continuum between N400 and P600 dominant responses. Similar variation was found both when agreement was realized via inflectional morphology or via lexical alternations. Individuals’ brain response type correlated strongly across these two conditions. Similar variation was also found for ERPs elicited during rapid serial visual presentation and when self-paced ERPs were recorded. Multilevel latent variable regression showed that variation in brain response amplitude and type was not related to individual differences in language experience or verbal working memory capacity, despite high statistical power. These findings indicate that descriptions of processing dynamics predicated solely on grand mean analyses of central tendency can fail to provide an accurate, generalizable account of how processing unfolds in many or most individual members of the population studied. Furthermore, these findings show that systematic individual variation in engagement of neural system supporting grammatical processing is found even in language users at the highest end of the proficiency spectrum and in grammatically simple sentences. This study therefore has implications for studies of language processing in atypical populations.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Dumenci ◽  
Robin Matsuyama ◽  
Robert Perera ◽  
Laura Kuhn ◽  
Laura Siminoff

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rina PY Lai ◽  
Michelle Renee Ellefson ◽  
Claire Hughes

Executive functions and metacognition are two cognitive predictors with well-established connections to academic performance. Despite sharing several theoretical characteristics, their overlap or independence concerning multiple academic outcomes remain under-researched. To address this gap, the present study applies a latent-variable approach to test a novel theoretical model that delineates the structural link between executive functions, metacognition, and academic outcomes. In whole-class sessions, 469 children aged 9 to 14 years (M = 11.93; SD = 0.92) completed four computerized executive function tasks (inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and planning), a self-reported metacognitive monitoring questionnaire, and three standardized tests of academic ability. The results suggest that executive functions and metacognitive monitoring are not interchangeable in the educational context and that they have both shared and unique contributions to diverse academic outcomes. The findings are important for elucidating the role between two domain-general cognitive skills (executive functions and metacognition) and domain-specific academic skills.


2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 1346-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc H. Bornstein ◽  
Chun-Shin Hahn ◽  
Diane L. Putnick ◽  
Joan T. D. Suwalsky

1993 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 346 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Donovan ◽  
Richard Jessor ◽  
Frances M. Costa

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Akira Hasegawa ◽  
Keita Somatori ◽  
Haruki Nishimura ◽  
Yosuke Hattori ◽  
Yoshihiko Kunisato

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Bouwmeester ◽  
Jeroen K. Vermunt ◽  
Klaas Sijtsma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document