scholarly journals Commentary on ‘How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection’

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Moore ◽  
Patrick Haggard
Keyword(s):  
Choice Blindness

scholarly journals How the Polls Can Be Both Spot On and Dead Wrong: Using Choice Blindness to Shift Political Attitudes and Voter Intentions

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e60554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Hall ◽  
Thomas Strandberg ◽  
Philip Pärnamets ◽  
Andreas Lind ◽  
Betty Tärning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Political Attitudes ◽  
Choice Blindness

scholarly journals A massive experiment on choice blindness in political decisions: Confidence, confabulation, and unconscious detection of self-deception

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0171108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Rieznik ◽  
Lorena Moscovich ◽  
Alan Frieiro ◽  
Julieta Figini ◽  
Rodrigo Catalano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Choice Blindness ◽  
Political Decisions

scholarly journals The Magician’s Choice: Providing illusory choice and sense of agency with the Equivoque forcing technique.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice PAILHES ◽  
Shringi Kumari ◽  
gustav kuhn
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Present Experiment ◽  
Sense Of Agency ◽  
Full View ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Choice Blindness ◽  
Moses Illusion

Forcing techniques allow magicians to subtly influence spectators’ choices and the outcome of their actions, and they provide powerful tools to study decision-making and the illusory sense of agency and freedom over choices we make. We investigate the Equivoque force, a technique that exploits semantic ambiguities and people’s failure to notice inconsistencies, to ensure that a spectator ends up with a pre-determined outcome. Similarly to choice blindness paradigms, the Equivoque forces participants to end up with an item they did not choose in the first place. However, here, the subterfuge is accomplished in full view. In three experiments, we showed that the Equivoque is highly effective in providing participants an illusory sense of agency over the outcome of their actions, even after 2 repetitions of the trick (experiment 2), and using items for which pre-existing preferences can be present (experiment 3). Across all experiments, participants were oblivious to inconsistencies in the procedure used to guide their decisions, and they were genuinely surprised by the experimenter’s matching prediction. Contrary to our prediction, the Equivoque force did not significantly change participants’ preference for the chosen item. We discuss the results with regards to other illusions of agency (e.g. forcing, choice blindness), failures in noticing semantic inconsistencies (e.g Moses illusion), and issues surrounding choice-induced-preference literature.

scholarly journals Choice blindness and choice-induced preference change in groups

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Pärnamets ◽  
Jorina von Zimmermann ◽  
Ramsey Raafat ◽  
Gabriel Vogel ◽  
Lars Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Time ◽  
Selection Task ◽  
Common Belief ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Preference Change ◽  
False Feedback ◽  
Choice Blindness ◽  
First Time ◽  
Do So

Contrary to common belief, our preferences do not only shape our decisions but are also shaped by what decisions we make. This effect, known as choice-induced preference change, has been extensively studied in individuals. Here we document choice-induced preference change in groups. We do so by using the choice-blindness paradigm, a method by which participants are given false feedback about their past choices. Participants are given a second round of choices following the choice blindness manipulation´measuring preference change resulting from accepting the manipulation. In Experiment 1 (N=83), we introduce a roommate selection task used in this paper and use it to replicate choice-induced preference change using choice-blindness in individuals. In Experiment 2 (N=160), dyad members made mutual choices in the roommate selection task and then receive either veridical or false feedback about what choice they made. The majority of the false feedback trials were accepted by the dyads as their own choices, thereby demonstrating choice blindness in dyads for the first time. Dyads exhibited choice-induced preference change and were more likely to choose the originally rejected option on trials where they accepted the manipulation compared to control trials. In Experiment 3 (N=80), we show that the preference effect induced by the choice blindness manipulation at the group level does not generalize back to follow up choices made by individual participants when removed from the group. In all studies, response time analyses further support our conclusions. Choice-induced preference change exists for both individuals and groups, but the level at which the choice was made constrains the influence of that choice on later preferences.

Choice Blindness, Confabulatory Introspection, and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms: Investigation in a Clinical Sample

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 376-385
Author(s):  
Shiu F. Wong ◽  
Frederick Aardema ◽  
Martha Giraldo-O’Meara ◽  
Lars Hall ◽  
Petter Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms ◽  
Choice Blindness

Choice Blindness and Preference Change: You Will Like This Paper Better If You (Believe You) Chose to Read It!

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Johansson ◽  
Lars Hall ◽  
Betty Tärning ◽  
Sverker Sikström ◽  
Nick Chater
Keyword(s):  
Preference Change ◽  
Choice Blindness

Choice Blindness, Confabulatory Introspection, and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A New Area of Investigation

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Aardema ◽  
Petter Johansson ◽  
Lars Hall ◽  
Stella-Marie Paradisis ◽  
Melha Zidani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms ◽  
Choice Blindness

scholarly journals FROM CHANGE BLINDNESS TO CHOICE BLINDNESS

PSYCHOLOGIA ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter JOHANSSON ◽  
Lars HALL ◽  
Sverker SIKSTRÖM
Keyword(s):  
Change Blindness ◽  
Choice Blindness
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document