Application of fracture mechanics to predict the failure load of adhesive joints used to bond CFRP laminates to steel members

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. André ◽  
R. Haghani ◽  
A. Biel
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Adhesive Joints ◽  
Cfrp Laminates ◽  
Steel Members

scholarly journals Strength and Failure Mechanism of Composite-Steel Adhesive Bond Single Lap Joints

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Kai Wei ◽  
Yiwei Chen ◽  
Maojun Li ◽  
Xujing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Failure Mechanism ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Lap Joints ◽  
Adhesive Joints ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Interface Failure ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Single Lap Joints ◽  
Structural Adhesive

Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics- (CFRP-) steel single lap joints with regard to tensile loading with two levels of adhesives and four levels of overlap lengths were experimentally analyzed and numerically simulated. Both joint strength and failure mechanism were found to be highly dependent on adhesive type and overlap length. Joints with 7779 structural adhesive were more ductile and produced about 2-3 kN higher failure load than MA830 structural adhesive. Failure load with the two adhesives increased about 147 N and 176 N, respectively, with increasing 1 mm of the overlap length. Cohesion failure was observed in both types of adhesive joints. As the overlap length increased, interface failure appeared solely on the edge of the overlap in 7779 adhesive joints. Finite element analysis (FEA) results revealed that peel and shear stress distributions were nonuniform, which were less severe as overlap length increased. Severe stress concentration was observed on the overlap edge, and shear failure of the adhesive was the main reason for the adhesive failure.

Adhesives in engineering

1997 ◽  
Vol 211 (5) ◽  
pp. 307-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Kinloch
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Service Life ◽  
Adhesive Joint ◽  
Adhesive Joints ◽  
Liquid Form ◽  
Engineering Applications ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Made In

When considering methods for joining materials, there are many advantages that engineering adhesives can offer, compared to the more traditional methods of joining such as bolting, brazing, welding, mechanical fasteners, etc. The advantages and disadvantages of using engineering adhesives are discussed and it is shown that it is possible to identify three distinct stages in the formation of an adhesive joint. Firstly, the adhesive initially has to be in a ‘liquid’ form so that it can readily spread over and make intimate molecular contact with the substrates. Secondly, in order for the joint to bear the loads that will be applied to it during its service life, the ‘liquid’ adhesive must now harden. In the case of adhesives used in engineering applications, the adhesive is often initially in the form of a ‘liquid’ monomer which polymerizes to give a high molecular weight polymeric adhesive. Thirdly, it must be appreciated that the load-carrying ability of the joint, and how long it will actually last, are affected by: (a) the design of the joint, (b) the manner in which loads are applied to it and (c) the environment that the joint encounters during its service life. Thus, to understand the science involved and to succeed in further developing the technology, the skills and knowledge from many different disciplines are required. Indeed, the input from surface chemists, polymer chemists and physicists, materials engineers and mechanical engineers are needed. Hence, the science and technology of adhesion and adhesives is a truly multidisciplined subject. These different disciplines have been brought together by developing a fracture mechanics approach to the failure of adhesive joints. The advances that have been made in applying the concepts of fracture mechanics to adhesive joints have enabled a better understanding of the fundamental aspects of adhesion and the more rapid extension of adhesives technology into advanced engineering applications.

Fracture Mechanics Applied to Adhesive Joints

2008 ◽  
pp. 85-85-19
Author(s):  
GE Wheeler ◽  
BS Madsen ◽  
KL DeVries
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Adhesive Joints

scholarly journals Strengthening of steel member using unbonded CFRP laminates

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 05025
Author(s):  
Fengky Satria Yoresta ◽  
Ryotaro Maruta ◽  
Genki Mieda ◽  
Yukihiro Matsumoto
Keyword(s):  
Steel Structures ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Great Success ◽  
Adhesively Bonded ◽  
Engineering Structures ◽  
Rc Structures ◽  
Cfrp Laminates ◽  
Cfrp Composites ◽  
Steel Members ◽  
Load Carrying

Excellent mechanical and physical properties make carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) the best options for repair, retrofit, and rehabilitation of civil engineering structures. A great success on application of this material in reinforced concrete (RC) structures has attracted much attention from many researchers to develop it in combination with steel. The number of studies on the use of CFRP composites for strengthening steel structures has still been limited and needs to be more explored. To date, the research in this field has mainly focused on CFRP strengthening with adhesively-bonded technique. This paper reports an experimental study to investigate the performance of slender axial compression steel members partially strengthened with unbonded CFRP composites. The requirements for stiffener to prevent buckling occurred in stiffening region are derived from structural equilibrium conditions. Vacuum-assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VaRTM) method is adopted to form CFRP laminates in the strengthened specimens. Totally eight small scale specimens are tested, and it is clear from the test that improvement in load-carrying capacity can be achieved by using CFRP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document