Interceptive Dentofacial Orthopedics (Growth Modification)

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-51
Author(s):  
Jennifer Caplin ◽  
Michael D. Han ◽  
Michael Miloro ◽  
Veerasathpurush Allareddy ◽  
Michael R. Markiewicz
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Anusuya ◽  
Amit Nagar ◽  
Pradeep Tandon ◽  
G. K. Singh ◽  
Gyan Prakash Singh ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceon Ramon ◽  
J. T. Martin ◽  
M. R. Powell

2010 ◽  
Vol 346 (1) ◽  
pp. 226-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Aschauer ◽  
Dino Spagnoli ◽  
Paul Bowen ◽  
Stephen C. Parker

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Sujal Amatya ◽  
Rabindra Man Shrestha ◽  
Shristi Napit

Introduction: Great emphasis has been given to the evaluation of sagittal apical base relationship in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The prediction of magnitude and direction of facial growth based on sagittal relationship will help in orthodontic treatment with growth modification. The objective of the study is to assess the growth pattern in skeletal Class I malocclusion. Materials and Method: 104 subjects (52 male and 52 female) with the age between 18-30 years with Class I skeletal relation was selected from lateral cephalograms of patients visiting the Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College. The ANB angle was measured to assess the sagittal jaw relationship and the Jarabak’s ratio to access the growth pattern. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each parameter. Pearson’s test was done to evaluate the correlation between the parameters. Independent t-test was done to compare Anterior Facial height (AFH), Posterior Facial Height (PFH) and Jarabak’s ratio between male and female subjects. Result: Among the total subjects with skeletal Class I malocclusion; hyperdivergent growth pattern was least (10.57%), followed by normodivergent (18.26%) and hypodivergent growth pattern (71.15%). Mean Jarabak’s ratio for hyperdivergent, normodivergent and hypodivergent growth pattern were 58.65±1.94, 63.98±0.85 and 69.98±4.13 respectively. Very strong correlation was found between AFH and PFH in hyperdivergent (r = 0.821) and normodivergent group (r =0.978). Strong correlation was found in hypodivergent group between AFH and PFH (r =0.743). Also, strong correlation was found in hypodivergent group between PFH and Jarabak’s ratio (r =0.643). Conclusion: Hypodivergent growth pattern was the dominant growth pattern in skeletal Class I malocclusion. PFH influenced the determination of Jarabak’s ratio more than the AFH in hypodivergent growth pattern. Hypodivergent growth pattern is correlated with large SNB angle.


2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Consolaro ◽  
Maria Fernanda Martins-Ortiz

O trabalho de Al-Qawasmi et al.¹, publicado em março de 2003 pelo American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, procurou estabelecer uma predisposição genética para justificar as reabsorções dentárias em Ortodontia, mas apresentou algumas limitações metodológicas e equívocos na interpretação de seus resultados. A análise criteriosa deste artigo ressalta que, na maioria, estas limitações foram mencionadas e reconhecidas pelos autores na discussão do trabalho, mas o seu resumo e título foram muito taxativos e conclusivos. A linguagem de estudos genéticos nem sempre é familiar a todos os clínicos e isto também requer uma análise esclarecedora à luz de uma visão mais aplicada ao cotidiano ortodôntico. Referenciar ou citar este trabalho de Al-Qawasmi et al.¹, para afirmar de forma taxativa que se demonstrou a natureza hereditária das reabsorções dentárias em Ortodontia, pode denotar falta de conhecimento sobre o assunto ou uma leitura ou compreensão apenas do seu título. Ou ainda, a citação deste trabalho como prova definitiva de associação entre hereditariedade e reabsorções dentárias em Ortodontia pode traduzir também o desejo de excluir da prática clínica a responsabilidade de planejar de forma individualizada e detalhada cada tratamento com base no conhecimento das possibilidades e limitações técnicas oferecidas pela ciência ortodôntica, bem como nas suas bases biológicas, por exemplo, valorizando a morfologia radicular e da crista óssea alveolar e o papel dos cementoblastos na proteção da superfície radicular.


1985 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Pancherz ◽  
Urban Hägg

2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 696-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramzi V. Haddad ◽  
Joseph G. Ghafari

ABSTRACT Objectives: To determine if a new facial line (T), tangent to the throat, intersects the mandibular border in anterior (ANT) and posterior (POST) parts in proportions varying with facial configuration, and to evaluate the association between chin projection and throat inclination and the potential for the T-line to reflect this association. Materials and Methods: Measurements on profile photographs and cephalograms of 135 adults (aged 18–50 years)—45 each of Class I, II, and III (CI, CII, CIII) malocclusions—included ANT and POST, chin-throat (CTA), and mento-cervical (MCA) angles. Pre- and posttreatment measurements were compared in two subgroups (n = 25 each) of CII and CIII orthognathic surgery patients and in CII, division 1 early-treatment patients (n = 63). Statistics included analysis of variance and t-test for group differences, and Pearson correlation for associations among variables. Results: ANT was nearly equal to POST in CI (50.99%) and CIII (51.86%) subjects and shorter in CII (36.01%) subjects. CTA and MCA were greater in CII profiles and smaller in CIII profiles. Significant differences (P < .0001) were observed for ANT, POST, CTA, and MCA between Classes I/II and II/III and for MCA between Classes II/III (P = .016). High correlations were noted between ANT and CTA in Classes I (r = −0.83), II (r = −0.73), and III (r = −0.68). In surgically treated patients, posttreatment measurements approached CI values. In the early-treatment group, ANT increased but remained smaller than POST; CTA decreased by nearly 13%. Conclusions: Chin-throat relations and chin extension are associated and require routine assessment in terms of diagnosis and treatment outcome. A practical tool to assess chin-throat relationship, the T-line bisects the mandibular body nearly equally in Class I faces.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 108-117
Author(s):  
Guilherme Thiesen

The present case report describes the orthodontic treatment of a patient with agenesis of maxillary left lateral incisor and Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. The patient also presented with maxillary midline deviation and inclination of the occlusal plane in the anterior region. Treatment objectives were: correction of sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible; correction of midline deviation, so as to cause maxillary and mandibular midlines to coincide; correction of overbite and leveling of the occlusal plane, so as to create ideal conditions for esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as a requirement for the title of certified by the BBO.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Md Ali Kawsar ◽  
Md Nurul Islam ◽  
Moutithi Sen ◽  
Subodh Chandra Chakraborty ◽  
Muhammad Tanvir Siddiqui

Background: White spot lesions (enamel demineralization) is one of the most common and a significant risk associated with orthodontic treatment. Objective: To determine the prevalence of white spot lesion during fixed orthodontic treatment. Method: This prospective observational study and was conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics from January 2016 to December 2017 over a period of two years. Patients with fixed orthodontic appliance age between 12-30 years of both sex attended for follow up were included in this study. After taking written consent, a questionnaire included socio-demographic data, clinical and outcome variables including routine clinical photographs to examine WSL were filled up for each patient. Routine clinical photographs to examine WSL were taken after 6 months and 12 months of fixing orthodontics appliance. Qualitative data were expressed as frequency distribution and percentage. Results: Maximum patients were in age group 12 – 16 years and prevalence of WSL was also sought maximum in this group. Out of 36 cases with WSL, 14 (38.9%) were male and 22 (61.1%) were female. Prevalence of WSL after six month of fixing orthodontic appliance was 21.8% and 26.1% after 12 months. Prevalence of WSL after six month of fixing orthodontic appliance in male was 26.4% & in female was 19.6% and after 12 month of fixing orthodontic appliance it was 30.2% in male and 24.1% in female. After six months of fixing orthodontic appliance 1-3 WSLs was found in 17.0% cases and ≥ 4 WSLs in 4.8% cases. After twelve months of fixing orthodontic appliance 1-3 WSLs was found in 19.4% cases and ≥ 4 WSLs in 6.7% cases. Maximum WSL was found in maxillary incisors. Conclusion: This study showed that 21.8% of the study subjects developed white spot lesions during orthodontic procedure and incisors were the most common affected teeth. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2019; 9 (2): 40-42


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document