Methodological differences between pharmacological treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder: what to do for the clinicians?

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovic Samalin ◽  
Sebastien Guillaume ◽  
Philippe Courtet ◽  
Mocrane Abbar ◽  
Sylvie Lancrenon ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnar Nesvåg ◽  
Jørgen G. Bramness ◽  
Marte Handal ◽  
Ingeborg Hartz ◽  
Vidar Hjellvik ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundAntipsychotic drug use among children and adolescents is increasing, and there is growing concern about off-label use and adverse effects. The present study aims to investigate the incidence, psychiatric co-morbidity and pharmacological treatment of severe mental disorder in Norwegian children and adolescents.MethodsWe obtained data on mental disorders from the Norwegian Patient Registry on 0–18 year olds who during 2009–2011 were diagnosed for the first time with schizophrenia-like disorder (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes F20-F29), bipolar disorder (F30-F31), or severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (F32.3 or F33.3). Data on filled prescriptions for psychotropic drugs were obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database.ResultsA total of 884 children and adolescents (25.1 per 100 000 person years) were first time diagnosed with schizophrenia-like disorder (12.6 per 100 000 person years), bipolar disorder (9.2 per 100 000 person years), or severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (3.3 per 100 000 person years) during 2009–2011. The most common co-morbid mental disorders were depressive (38.1%) and anxiety disorders (31.2%). Antipsychotic drugs were prescribed to 62.4% of the patients, 72.0% of the schizophrenia-like disorder patients, 51.7% of the bipolar disorder patients, and 55.4% of the patients with psychotic depression. The most commonly prescribed drugs were quetiapine (29.5%), aripiprazole (19.6%), olanzapine (17.3%), and risperidone (16.6%).ConclusionsWhen a severe mental disorder was diagnosed in children and adolescents, the patient was usually also prescribed antipsychotic medication. Clinicians must be aware of the high prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among early psychosis patients.


Author(s):  
David J. Miklowitz ◽  
W. Edward Craighead

Whereas pharmacological interventions remain the primary treatment for bipolar disorder, adjunctive psychosocial interventions have the potential to increase adherence to medication regimens, decrease hospitalizations and relapses, improve quality of life, and enhance mechanisms for coping with stress. Controlled studies have established that individual, family, and group psychoeducation, designed to provide information to bipolar patients and their families about the disorder, its pharmacological treatment, and the treatments’ side effects, leads to lower rates of recurrence and greater adherence to pharmacological treatment among bipolar patients. Type 1 and 2 studies have evaluated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as an ancillary treatment. These studies indicate that CBT is associated with better medication adherence and significantly fewer recurrences and/or rehospitalizations. One Type 1 study has evaluated the effectiveness of IPSRT (interpersonal and social rhythm therapy) for bipolar disorder. IPSRT demonstrated its greatest symptomatic effects during a maintenance treatment period, especially if bipolar patients had been successful in stabilizing their daily and nightly routines during an acute treatment period. Finally, four Type 1 studies in adult and pediatric patients have shown that marital/ family therapy may be effectively combined with pharmacotherapy to reduce recurrences and improve medication adherence and family functioning.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Robert M. Post ◽  
Kiki D. Chang ◽  
Trisha Suppes ◽  
David L. Ginsberg

AbstractApproximately 40% of bipolar patients experience rapid cycling, and half of these suffer from ultra-rapid or ultradian cycling. These patterns are also common in children. Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder is difficult to bring to remission and often requires treatment with four or more classes of psychotropic medications. Lithium, even in combination with anticonvulsants or antidepressants, is often associated with residual episodic depressions. Concerns with adjunctive antidepressant treatment include their low response and remission rates and their tendency to cause switch into mania. Atypical antipsychotics and selected agents within the anticonvulsant class are becoming increasingly important in the treatment of rapid cycling. In the absence of clear treatment guidelines, the use and sequencing of drugs in complex combination treatment remains exploratory, but should be individualized based on careful prospective mood charting by the patient. Use of several drugs below their side-effect thresholds may prevent certain side effects. In children, long-term safety considerations are particularly important in the absence of a strong controlled clinical trials database.


2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.N. Fountoulakis ◽  
E. Vieta ◽  
J. Sanchez-Moreno ◽  
S.G. Kaprinis ◽  
J.M. Goikolea ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 402-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadka Dubicka ◽  
Paul Wilkinson ◽  
Raphael G. Kelvin ◽  
Ian M. Goodyer

SummaryMajor depression and bipolar disorder in children and adolescents are serious conditions associated with considerable morbidity as well as increased risk of suicide. The treatment of depression in young people is currently controversial and this article reviews the evidence base and potential risks and benefits of antidepressants. Although the diagnosis of bipolar disorder is also controversial, medication is the first-line treatment of choice in cases that meet diagnostic criteria. The limited evidence base in children and adolescents is presented, along with current treatment guidelines. Despite the controversies in this field, this article concludes that medication remains an important part of the treatment approach for both disorders, although the risks and benefits of pharmacotherapy need to be carefully assessed in each patient.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S121-S121
Author(s):  
C.P. Ferreira ◽  
S. Alves ◽  
C. Oliveira ◽  
M.J. Avelino

IntroductionGeriatric-onset of a first-episode mania is a rare psychiatric condition, which may be caused by a heterogeneous group of non-psychiatric conditions. To confirm late-onset bipolar disorder (LOBD) diagnosis, secondary-mania causes should be ruled out.ObjectivesTo provide a comprehensive review reporting prevalence, features, differential diagnosis, comorbidity and treatment of LOBD.MethodsThe literature was systematically reviewed by online searching using PubMed®. The authors selected review papers with the words “Late-onset mania” and/or “Late-onset bipolar” in the title and/or abstract published in the last 10 years.Results and discussionWith population ageing, LOBD is becoming a more prevalent disorder. Clinical presentation may be atypical and confounding, making the diagnosis not always obvious. Several non-psychiatric conditions must be considered in an elderly patient presenting with new-onset mania, namely stroke, dementia, hyperthyroidism or infection causing delirium. Only then LOBD diagnosis may be done, making that an exclusion diagnosis. Comorbidities, such as hypertension or renal insufficiency are often present in the elderly and must be taken into account when choosing a mood stabilizer.ConclusionsLOBD remains a complex and relatively understudied disorder with important diagnostic and therapeutic implications. This diagnosis must be kept in mind for every elderly patient presenting with new-onset mania. Further investigations could contribute to a better understanding of LOBD etiopathogenesis and to set out better treatment guidelines.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document