Wave absorbing-boundary method in seismic centrifuge simulation of vertical free-field ground motion

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Soudkhah ◽  
Ronald Y.S. Pak
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Absorbing Boundary ◽  
Boundary Method

Conditioned Simulation of Ground-Motion Time Series at Uninstrumented Sites Using Gaussian Process Regression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidin Tamhidi ◽  
Nicolas Kuehn ◽  
S. Farid Ghahari ◽  
Arthur J. Rodgers ◽  
Monica D. Kohler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Gaussian Process ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Motion Time

ABSTRACT Ground-motion time series are essential input data in seismic analysis and performance assessment of the built environment. Because instruments to record free-field ground motions are generally sparse, methods are needed to estimate motions at locations with no available ground-motion recording instrumentation. In this study, given a set of observed motions, ground-motion time series at target sites are constructed using a Gaussian process regression (GPR) approach, which treats the real and imaginary parts of the Fourier spectrum as random Gaussian variables. Model training, verification, and applicability studies are carried out using the physics-based simulated ground motions of the 1906 Mw 7.9 San Francisco earthquake and Mw 7.0 Hayward fault scenario earthquake in northern California. The method’s performance is further evaluated using the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake ground motions recorded by the Community Seismic Network stations located in southern California. These evaluations indicate that the trained GPR model is able to adequately estimate the ground-motion time series for frequency ranges that are pertinent for most earthquake engineering applications. The trained GPR model exhibits proper performance in predicting the long-period content of the ground motions as well as directivity pulses.

Near-Field Ground Motion of the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska, Earthquake Recorded at Pump Station 10

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 597-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Ellsworth ◽  
M. Celebi ◽  
J. R. Evans ◽  
E. G. Jensen ◽  
R. Kayen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Peak Acceleration ◽  
Permanent Displacement ◽  
Soil Response ◽  
Denali Fault ◽  
Field Recording ◽  
Pump Station

A free-field recording of the Denali fault earthquake was obtained by the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company 3 km from the surface rupture of the Denali fault. The instrument, part of the monitoring and control system for the trans-Alaska pipeline, was located at Pump Station 10, approximately 85 km east of the epicenter. After correction for the measured instrument response, we recover a seismogram that includes a permanent displacement of 3.0 m. The recorded ground motion has relatively low peak acceleration (0.36 g) and very high peak velocity (180 cm/s). Nonlinear soil response may have reduced the peak acceleration to this 0.36 g value. Accelerations in excess of 0.1 g lasted for 10 s, with the most intense motion occurring during a 1.5-s interval when the rupture passed the site. The low acceleration and high velocity observed near the fault in this earthquake agree with observations from other recent large-magnitude earthquakes.

Effect of a single vibrating building on free-field ground motion: numerical and experimental evidences

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ditommaso ◽  
M. Mucciarelli ◽  
M. R. Gallipoli ◽  
F. C. Ponzo
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Free Field

Six-degree-of-freedom ground-motion measurement

1994 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1665-1669
Author(s):  
Robert L. Nigbor
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Strong Ground Motion ◽  
Rotational Velocity ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Vertical Acceleration ◽  
Data Logger ◽  
Six Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Strong Ground

Abstract True six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) measurement of free-field strong ground motion has been accomplished using a prototype 6DOF accelerograph system. This system consists of a traditional triaxial translational accelerometer, three new rotational velocity sensors, and a digital data logger. Rotational and translational ground motions at a single free-field location were measured successfully during the recent NPE event, a very large (1 kton) chemical explosion. Peak vertical acceleration at the near-field measurement site exceeded 1g for this event; the peak measured rotational velocity was 2.2°/sec. Earthquake strong-ground-motion measurements are currently in progress.

The effect of soil-structure interaction on seismometer readings

1978 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 823-843
Author(s):  
G. N. Bycroft
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Rigid Sphere ◽  
Elastic Space ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Frequency Components ◽  
Low Shear

abstract Rocking and vertical and horizontal translations of typical “free-field” seismometer installations lead to magnification of the ground motion record. This magnification can be significant for the higher frequency components if the terrain has a relatively low shear-wave velocity. Seismometers placed on foundations which cover a significant part of a wavelength of a horizontally incident wave, experience an attenuated ground motion. A method of correcting the seismograms for these effects is given. Compliance functions for a rigid sphere in a full elastic space are derived and are used to show that, in practical cases, down-hole seismometer installations are not significantly affected by interaction. These compliance functions should be useful in discussing the soil structure interaction of structures erected on bulbous piles. They may be also used as the basis of a method of determining elastic constants of ground at depth, in situ, and at different frequencies.

Empirical Site Amplification Modelling for Horizontal and Vertical Ground Motions in Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsiang Kuo ◽  
Shu-Hsien Chao ◽  
Che-Min Lin ◽  
Jyun-Yan Huang ◽  
Kuo-Liang Wen
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Amplification Factor ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Amplification Factors ◽  
Taipei Basin ◽  
Vertical Ground Motions ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Site Amplification Factor

<p>Site amplification behavior are important in ground motion prediction. Seismic waves were amplified and caused significant building damages in the Taipei Basin by the 1986 Hualien offshore (subduction interface) and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquakes (crustal), for which both of the epicentral distances were nearly 100 km. To understand local site amplifications in Taiwan, empirical site amplification factors for both horizontal and vertical ground motions are studied using recently constructed strong motion and site databases for the free-field TSMIP stations. Records of large magnitude earthquakes of M<sub>W</sub> larger than 5.5 from 1991 to 2016 were selected for this study. Site amplification factors at site conditions with Vs30 between 120 m/s to 1600 m/s and bedrock accelerations up to 0.8 g were evaluated using ratios of spectral accelerations at different periods. The reference site condition, i.e. the engineering bedrock, is assumed as Vs30 of 760 m/s (B/C boundary) in this study. Our empirical site amplification form are borrowed from the site response function of ASK14 and CY14 ground motion models in NGA-West2 project with slight modification. Therefore our site amplification model includes a linear amplification term and a nonlinear deamplification term. The coefficients of the empirical models were obtained by a nonlinear regression analysis using the selected Taiwan data. Site amplification factor is a function of Vs30 and spectral intensity in the model. Similar linear site amplification factor to the NGA models is derived in our model; however, more significant soil nonlinearity behavior than the NGA models is likely captured from the empirical data. The amplification factor in vertical component is smaller than that in horizontal.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document