Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation of a spatially developing flat plate turbulent boundary layer

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Deck ◽  
Pierre-Élie Weiss ◽  
Mathieu Pamiès ◽  
Eric Garnier
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Simulation

Interference effects of three consecutive wall-mounted cubes placed in deep turbulent boundary layer

2014 ◽  
Vol 756 ◽  
pp. 165-190
Author(s):  
Hee Chang Lim ◽  
Masaaki Ohba
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Azimuth Angle ◽  
Pressure Variation ◽  
Interference Effects ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Mean Pressure ◽  
The Mean

AbstractIn this study we undertook various calculations of the turbulent flow around a building in close proximity to neighbouring obstacles, with the aim of gaining an understanding of the velocity and the surface-pressure variations with respect to the azimuth angle of wind direction and the gap distance between the obstacles. This paper presents the effects of flow interference among consecutive cubes for azimuth angles of $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}\theta = 0$, 15, 30, and $45^{\circ }$ and gap distances of $G = 0.5{h}, 1.0{h}, 1.5{h}$, and $\infty $ (i.e. a single cube), where $h$ is the cube height, placed in a turbulent boundary layer. A transient detached eddy simulation (DES) was carried out to calculate the highly complicated flow domain around the three wall-mounted cubes to observe the fluctuating pressure, which substantially contributes to the suction pressure when there is separation and reattachment around the leading and trailing edges of the cubes. In addition, the results indicate that an increasing azimuth angle increases the pressure variation on the centre cube of the three parallel-aligned cubes. The mean pressure variation can even change from negative to positive on the side face. Owing to interference effects, the mean pressure coefficient of the centre cube of the three parallel-aligned cubes was generally lower than the coefficient of the single cube and tended to increase depending on the gap distance. Furthermore, when the three consecutive cubes are in a tandem arrangement, the gap distance has little influence on the first cube but results in significant interference effects on the second and third cubes.

Assessment of DES Models for Separated Flow From a Hump in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Lyons ◽  
Leonard J. Peltier ◽  
Frank J. Zajaczkowski ◽  
Eric G. Paterson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Separation Point ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Flow Solver ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation

Separated flow past a hump in a turbulent boundary layer is studied numerically using detached-eddy simulation (DES), zonal detached-eddy simulation (ZDES), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) modeling. The geometry is smooth so the separation point is a function of the flow solution. Comparisons to experimental data show that RANS with the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model predicts the mean-field statistics well. The ZDES and DDES methods perform better than the DES formulation and are comparable to RANS in most statistics. Analyses motivate that modeled-stress depletion near the separation point contributes to differences observed in the DES variants. The order of accuracy of the flow solver ACUSOLVE is also documented.

Assessment of DES Models for Separated Flow From a Hump in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Lyons ◽  
Leonard J. Peltier ◽  
Frank J. Zajaczkowski ◽  
Eric G. Paterson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Rans Modeling

Turbulent flow past the Glauert-Goldschmied body, a flow-control hump in a turbulent boundary layer, is studied numerically using detached-eddy simulation (DES), zonal detached-eddy simulation (ZDES), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling. The geometry is smooth so the downstream separation point is not set by facets of the geometry but is a function of the pressure gradient, a challenging condition for turbulence models. Comparisons to experimental data show that RANS with the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model predicts the mean-field statistics well. The ZDES and DDES methods perform better than the DES formulation and are comparable to RANS in most statistics. An analysis of model behavior indicates that modeled stress depletion in the detached shear layer shortly after separation leads to loss of accuracy in the DES variants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document