Improving student performance in a first-year geography course: Examining the importance of computer-assisted formative assessment

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 1493-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathi Wilson ◽  
Cleo Boyd ◽  
Liwen Chen ◽  
Sarosh Jamal
Author(s):  
Belinda Jane Cooke

This paper describes an intervention aimed at reducing the occurrence of common weaknesses in first level work and thereby improving student performance in assessments. The project involved developing a more systematic approach to embedding information literacy (IL) into the first year curriculum in the Carnegie Faculty at Leeds Beckett University by combining the expertise of subject librarians with that of first year tutors. It was part of a broader programme of institutional curricular change. This collaborative approach was informed by data from individual interviews with previous students and based on a dual rationale: firstly from Sadler’s (2002) call for more high impact, low stakes assessment in the first year and secondly a need to avoid creating a culture of ‘testing’ (Sambell, McDowell, & Montgomery, 2013) in which students position themselves as submitting to others’ judgments rather than developing rational autonomy (Baxter-Magolda, 2003). In other words, we needed to design an assessed activity which encouraged students to engage in learning but created a supportive and collaborative approach. The embedding process together with some of the resources and tools which we developed are described in this paper as well as the respective contributions of the various participants. We explore the impact of two years of implementation based on student interviews and tutor evaluations. Recommendations and examples are provided to demonstrate how a similar approach might work elsewhere either as a local, course-specific intervention or as part of an institution-wide approach to improving students’ digital literacy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Benson ◽  
David Bowman ◽  
Randolph, Randy Hutchison ◽  
Carol Wade

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-288
Author(s):  
Ben O. Smith ◽  
Rebekah Shrader ◽  
Dustin R. White ◽  
Jadrian Wooten ◽  
John Dogbey ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1835 (1) ◽  
pp. 012053
Author(s):  
Thanh-Tung Nguyen ◽  
Dieu-Linh Hoang ◽  
Hoang-Thuy Linh Nguyen ◽  
Thanh-Binh Nguyen

Author(s):  
Meghan Shaughnessy ◽  
Nicole M. Garcia ◽  
Michaela Krug O’Neill ◽  
Sarah Kate Selling ◽  
Amber T. Willis ◽  
...  

AbstractMathematics discussions are important for helping students to develop conceptual understanding and to learn disciplinary norms and practices. In recent years, there has been increased attention to teaching prospective teachers to lead discussions with students. This paper examines the possibilities of designing a formative assessment that gathers information about prospective elementary teachers’ skills with leading problem-based mathematics discussions and makes sense of such information. A decomposition of the practice of leading discussions was developed and used to design the assessment. Nine first-year teachers who graduated from a range of different teacher education programs participated in the study. The findings reveal that our formative assessment works to gather information about teachers’ capabilities with leading discussions and that the associated tools support making sense of the information gathered. This suggests that such tools could be useful to support the formative assessment of the developing capabilities of prospective teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document