GPFARM modeling of corn yield and residual soil nitrate-N

2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J Shaffer ◽  
P.N.S Bartling ◽  
G.S McMaster
1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Zebarth ◽  
J. W. Paul ◽  
O. Schmidt ◽  
R. McDougall

Manure-N availability must be known in order to design application practices that maximize the nutrient value of the manure while minimizing adverse environmental impacts. This study determined the effect of time and rate of liquid manure application on silage corn yield and N utilization, and residual soil nitrate at harvest, in south coastal British Columbia. Liquid dairy or liquid hog manure was applied at target rates of 0, 175, 350 or 525 kg N ha−1, with or without addition of 100 kg N ha−1 as inorganic fertilizer, at two sites in each of 2 yr. Time of liquid-dairy-manure application was also tested at two sites in each of 2 yr with N-application treatments of: 600 kg N ha−1 as manure applied in spring; 600 kg N ha−1 as manure applied in fall; 300 kg N ha−1 as manure applied in each of spring and fall; 200 kg N ha−1 applied as inorganic fertilizer in spring; 300 kg N ha−1 as manure plus 100 kg N ha−1 as inorganic fertilizer applied in spring; and a control that received no applied N. Fall-applied manure did not increase corn yield or N uptake in the following growing season. At all sites, maximum yield was attained using manure only. Selection of proper spring application rates for manure and inorganic fertilizer were found to be equally important in minimizing residual soil nitrate at harvest. Apparent recovery of applied N in the crop ranged from 0 to 33% for manure and from 18 to 93% for inorganic fertilizer. Key words: N recovery, manure management


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Grove ◽  
E. M. Pena-Yewtukhiw

There is evidence that well managed winter cereal cover crops can scavenge a goodly amount of post summer cereal harvest residual nitrogen (N), reducing nitrate-N losses to leaching or runoff. The objective of this study was to compare nitrate-N phytoremediation areas derived from five sources of information: site specific, non-site specific, or a combination. The non-site specific source was a single “composite” soil nitrate sample. The site specific sources were: a) a dense soil nitrate-N grid sampling; and b) a N removal map calculated from yield and grain N concentration, both determined at the same grid density as soil nitrate-N. The source combinations were: a) a yield map and a single grain N concentration value taken from published information; and b) a yield map and a single field “composite” grain N concentration value. The results indicated that the published grain N value was inferior to measured grain N values, and that the maize (Zea mays L.) yield map best serves as a stratification tool, delineating similar crop performance areas. Random soil sampling within those areas further optimizes residual nitrate-N recovery management. Site specific technologies can guide establishment of N scavenging cover crops to simultaneously improve resource use efficiency and water quality.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1527-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenling Cui ◽  
Xinping Chen ◽  
Yuxin Miao ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Fusuo Zhang ◽  
...  

Soil Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 179 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Jokela ◽  
Sidney C. Bosworth ◽  
John J. Rankin

2010 ◽  
Vol 44-45 (2010-2011) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Michael Aide ◽  
Indi Braden ◽  
Neil Hermann ◽  
David Mauk ◽  
Wesley Mueller ◽  
...  

Abstract Controlled subsurface drainage irrigation systems promote crop productivity; however, these land management systems also allow an efficient pathway for the transport of elements from soils to surface water resources. The nitrate and macro-element effluent concentrations from tile-drainage involving a 40 ha controlled subsurface drainage irrigation system are described and compared to soil nitrate availability. Soil nitrate concentrations generally show an increase immediately after soil nitrogen fertilization practices and are sufficiently abundant to promote their transport from the soil resource to the tile-drain effluent waters. The data indicates that: (1) the transport of nitrate-N in tile-drain effluent waters is appreciable; (2) denitrification pathways effectively reduce a portion of the soil nitrate-N when the controlled drainage system establishes winter-early spring anoxic soil conditions, and (3) the best strategy for reducing nitrate-N concentrations in tile-drain effluent waters is adjusting N fertilization rates and the timing of their application. The development of bioreactors for simulating wetland conditions may further limit nitrate concentrations in surface waters because of soil drainage.


jpa ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Schmitt ◽  
C. C. Sheaffer ◽  
G. W. Randall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document