A fuzzy clustering based color-coded diagram for effective illustration of blood perfusion parameters in contrast-enhanced ultrasound videos

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 ◽  
pp. 105233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhemin Zhuang ◽  
Guangwen Fan ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Alex Noel Joseph Raj ◽  
Shunmin Qiu
2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1628-1638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Shirinifard ◽  
Suresh Thiagarajan ◽  
Melissa D. Johnson ◽  
Christopher Calabrese ◽  
András Sablauer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janu Eva ◽  
Krikavova Lucie ◽  
Little Jirina ◽  
Dvorak Karel ◽  
Brancikova Dagmar ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To determine the benefit of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed in 230 breast lesions classified as BI-RADS category 3 to 5. All lesions were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. MVI (MicroVascular Imaging) technique was used to derive qualitative analysis parameters; blood perfusion of the lesions was assessed (perfusion homogeneity, type of vascularization, enhancement degree). Quantitative analysis was conducted to estimate perfusion changes in the lesions within drawn regions of interest (ROI); parameters TTP (time to peak), PI (peak intensity), WIS (wash in slope), AUC (area under curve) were obtained from time intensity (TI) curves. Acquired data were statistically analyzed to assess the ability of each parameter to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The combination of parameters was also evaluated for the possibility of increasing the overall diagnostic accuracy. Biological nature of the lesions was verified by a pathologist. Benign lesions without histopathological verification (BI-RADS 3) were followed up for at least 24 months. Results: Out of 230 lesions, 146 (64%) were benign, 67 (29%) were malignant, 17 (7%) lesions were eliminated. Malignant tumors showed statistically significantly lower TTP parameters (sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 52.7%) and higher WIS values (sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 66.4%) than benign tumors. Enhancement degree also proved to be statistically well discriminating as 55.2% of malignant lesions had a rich vascularity (sensitivity 89.6% and specificity 48.6%). The combination of quantitative analysis parameters (TTP, WIS) with enhancement degree did not result in higher accuracy in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound has the potential to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions. In particular, this method could help to differentiate lesions BI-RADS category 3 and 4 and thus reduce the number of core-cut biopsies performed in benign lesions. Qualitative analysis, despite its subjective element, appeared to be more beneficial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis did not increase the predictive capability of CEUS.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janu Eva ◽  
Krikavova Lucie ◽  
Little Jirina ◽  
Dvorak Karel ◽  
Brancikova Dagmar ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To determine the benefit of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of breast lesions.Materials and Methods: A standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed in 230 breast lesions classified as BI-RADS category 3 to 5. All lesions were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. MVI (MicroVascular Imaging) technique was used to derive qualitative analysis parameters; blood perfusion of the lesions was assessed (perfusion homogeneity, type of vascularization, enhancement degree). Quantitative analysis was conducted to estimate perfusion changes in the lesions within drawn regions of interest (ROI); parameters TTP (time to peak), PI (peak intensity), WIS (wash in slope), AUC (area under curve) were obtained from time intensity (TI) curves. Acquired data were statistically analyzed to assess the ability of each parameter to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The combination of parameters was also evaluated for the possibility of increasing the overall diagnostic accuracy. Biological nature of the lesions was verified by a pathologist. Benign lesions without histopathological verification (BI-RADS 3) were followed up for at least 24 months.Results: Out of 230 lesions, 146 (64%) were benign, 67 (29%) were malignant, 17 (7%) lesions were eliminated. Malignant tumors showed statistically significantly lower TTP parameters (sensitivity 77.6%, specificity 52.7%) and higher WIS values (sensitivity 74.6%, specificity 66.4%) than benign tumors. Enhancement degree also proved to be statistically well discriminating as 55.2% of malignant lesions had a rich vascularity (sensitivity 89.6% and specificity 48.6%). The combination of quantitative analysis parameters (TTP, WIS) with enhancement degree did not result in higher accuracy in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions.Conclusion: We have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound has the potential to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions. In particular, this method could help to differentiate lesions BI-RADS category 3 and 4 and thus reduce the number of core-cut biopsies performed in benign lesions. Qualitative analysis, despite its subjective element, appeared to be more beneficial. A combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis did not increase the predictive capability of CEUS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1231-1235
Author(s):  
Huajie Zhao ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Bili Liu

Objective: To assess contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)'s value in the diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer. Methods : 83 breast cancer patients from April 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled and assigned into observation group (triple, n = 39) and control group (non-triple, n = 44). The diagnostic examinations were performed via CEUS and the features of CEUS were analyzed. Besides, patients in observation group also received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the diagnostic difference was assessed. Results: Observation group showed a significantly smaller size of focus after CEUS than control group compared to before CEUS (p < 0 05) with significant difference of focus enhancement and vascular morphology between two groups (p < 0 05). As for focus blood perfusion parameters, no differences were found regarding rise time (RT) and time to peak (TTP) between the two groups (p > 0 05). However, observation group had significantly higher peak intensity (PI) and wash-in slope (WIS) (p < 0 05). Interestingly, no difference of TNBC diagnosis was observed between CEUS and MRI (p < 0 05). Conclusion: CEUS might be beneficial for screening of triple negative breast cancer before operations and can be used to monitor the focus blood perfusion in a real-time way.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document