Improving the work efficiency of healthcare-associated infection surveillance using electronic medical records

2014 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Sheng Lo ◽  
Wen-Sen Lee ◽  
Guo-Bin Chen ◽  
Chien-Tsai Liu
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Work Efficiency ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Healthcare Associated

scholarly journals Validation Methodology of Healthcare-Associated Infection Device Day Denominators When Switching Electronic Medical Records

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s428-s429
Author(s):  
Lan Luong ◽  
Michelle Simkins ◽  
Rachael Snyders ◽  
Kathleen Anne Gase ◽  
Carole Leone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Prediction Methods ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Nursing Documentation ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Validation Phase ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Background: From August 2017 to June 2018, 11 hospitals within a large healthcare system switched from multiple different electronic medical records (EMRs) to 1 EMR. At the time of this transition, the NHSN provided guidelines to validate healthcare-associated infection (HAI) denominators when switching from manual denominator collection to electronic denominator collection, but the NHSN did not give guidelines for validation when switching from 1 EMR to another. We aimed to build a validation process to ensure the accuracy of central-line and urinary catheter days reported to the NHSN after switching EMRs. Methods: Our validation process began with a statistical phase followed by a targeted manual validation phase. The statistical phase used 3 prediction methods (linear regression, time series analysis, and statistical process control [SPC] charts) to forecast device days after the EMR switch for units within hospitals. Models were developed using baseline data from the old EMR (January 2015 through the new EMR implementation). Using prespecified criteria for each method to determine discrepancies, we built a decision tree to identify units needing manual validation. Any unit that failed the statistical phase would need to participate in the manual validation phase, using a midnight census and direct visualization of devices. The manual validation process was composed of 14-day blocks. At the end of each block, if manual device days were within ±5% of EMR device days, they were considered validated. Manual validation would be repeated in 14-day blocks until 2 consecutive blocks passed within ±5%. Results: Overall, 157 units were evaluated for urinary catheter days and central-line days. Among them, 143 units passed the statistical validation test for urinary catheter days and 151 passed for central-line days. There was no specific pattern when comparing forecasted versus actual device days. The manual validation process for the 20 failing units (14 urinary catheter and 6 central-line units) is ongoing; preliminary results identified issues with missing nursing documentation in the EMR and with inaccurate manual counting of device days. There were no systematic discrepancies associated with the new EMR. Conclusions: We developed a novel validation process using statistical prediction methods supplemented with a targeted manual process. This process saved resources by identifying the units that need manual validation. Discrepancies were largely related to nursing documentation, which the infection prevention team addressed with additional training.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Validation of healthcare-associated infection surveillance in smaller Australian hospitals

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-88
Author(s):  
A.J. Hoskins ◽  
L.J. Worth ◽  
N. Imam ◽  
S.A. Johnson ◽  
A.L. Bull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Impact on rates and time to first central vascular-associated bloodstream infection when switching from open to closed intravenous infusion containers in a hospital setting

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
pp. 1041-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. FRANZETTI ◽  
B. BORGHI ◽  
F. RAIMONDI ◽  
V. D. ROSENTHAL
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Closed Container ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Open Container ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Time To Onset

SUMMARYAn open-label, prospective cohort, active healthcare-associated infection surveillance sequential study was conducted in four Italian intensive-care units. The aim was to determine the effect of switching from open (glass) to closed fully collapsible plastic intravenous (i.v.) infusion containers (Viaflo®) on rate and time to onset of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC-BSI). A total of 1173 adult patients were enrolled. The CVC-BSI rate during the open container period was significantly higher than during the closed container period (8·2vs. 3·5 BSI/1000 CVC days, relative risk 0·43, 95% confidence interval 0·22–0·84,P=0·01). The probability of developing a CVC-BSI was assessed over time comparing open and closed i.v. infusion containers. In the closed container period, it remained fairly constant (0·8% at days 1–3 to 1·4% at days 7–9) whereas during the open container period it increased (2% at days 1–3 to 5·8% at days 7–9). Overall, the chance of acquiring a CVC-BSI significantly decreased by 61% in the closed container period (Cox proportional hazard ratio 0·39,P=0·004).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document