Adverse Event Management of mTOR Inhibitors During Treatment of Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Considerations for Oncologists

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 297-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise A. Yardley
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Event Management ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Adverse Event Management

Current status of hormone therapy in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer

The Breast ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 710-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Dalmau ◽  
Alejandra Armengol-Alonso ◽  
Montserrat Muñoz ◽  
Miguel Ángel Seguí-Palmer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Review of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-203
Author(s):  
Keith A. Hecht ◽  
Christopher Selby
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Cdk Inhibitors ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Objective: To evaluate the existing literature regarding the use of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Data Sources: A search of the medical literature was performed using PubMed (2014 to June 2018). Search terms included cyclin-dependent kinase, CDK, breast cancer, palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib, PD0332991, LEE011, and LY2835219. Clinicaltrials.gov was also searched. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Trials with clinical efficacy outcomes evaluating CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hormone-positive breast cancer were considered. Data Synthesis: Palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib each demonstrated significant benefit when combined with an aromatase inhibitor, the benefit to patients was similar for each, with an improvement of 42% to 51% in median progression-free survival (PFS). In combination with fulvestrant, CDK 4/6 inhibitors used for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive ABC resulted in a 43% to 58% improvement in median PFS versus fulvestrant alone. CDK inhibitors are relatively well tolerated; however, discontinuation as a result of adverse effects was highest with abemaciclib. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review considers the use of the 3 commercially available CDK 4/6 inhibitors for treatment of hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, including data on each of the 3 agents in newly advanced and treatment refractory disease. Conclusions: The CDK inhibitors should be used in combination with endocrine therapies for the treatment of ABC. Efficacy of the 3 agents is similar. Selection within the class should include consideration of adverse effects and drug interactions.

Everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: A comprehensive cancer center’s experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13017-e13017
Author(s):  
Inês Moreira ◽  
Marta Ferreira ◽  
Ana Afonso ◽  
Ana Ferreira ◽  
Ana Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

e13017 Background: Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin intracellular signaling pathway is one of the mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. The addition of everolimus to exemestane improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with HR+ ABC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with HR+, HER2 negative ABC treated with everolimus/exemestane that recurred or progressed during/after treatment with NSAIs in a portuguese comprehensive cancer center. Study endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate and adverse events. Results: Between April 2014 and September 2020, 63 female patients were treated with everolimus/exemestane. Median age was 59 years (36-79), and all had performance status ECOG ≤2. Seventeen (27.0%) patients had bone metastasis alone, 39 (61.9%) had bone and visceral metastasis, 25 (39.7%) had metastasis in 3 or more sites and 87.3% had previous hormone-sensitive disease. Before everolimus/exemestane, 61 (96.8%) patients were being treated with palliative endocrine therapy (alone or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors) or chemotherapy (ChT) and 2 (3.2%) patients were under adjuvant endocrine therapy. Median follow-up time was 12.8 months (1.4-74.6), with 39 patients alive. Overall response rate was 14.3% (1 complete response and 8 partial responses) and 45 patients had stable disease. Median PFS was 5.6 months (CI95% 2.4-8.8) and median OS was 25.4 months (CI95% 10.3-40.5). Subgroup analysis regarding PFS was statistically significant for previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (p = 0.026) and for site of metastasis (p = 0.025). In the subgroup of patients that previously underwent palliative ChT, median PFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 0.2-9.6) and median OS was 18.6 months (CI95% 8.2-29.0). For patients that did not receive previous palliative ChT, median PFS was 5.8 months (CI95% 3.8-7.8) and median OS was 43.5 months (CI95% 2.0-85.0). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 21 (33.3%) patients, and were: nausea, anorexia, rash, headache, haematologic toxicity, hepatic cytolysis, hyperglycaemia, pneumonitis, oral mucositis and acute kidney failure with need for haemodialysis. Fifty-five (87.3%) patients suspended everolimus, 34 (54.0%) due to disease progression and 21 (33.3%) due to toxicity. Conclusions: Our results confirm the effectiveness and safety of everolimus/exemestane in real-world setting and support its use mainly before palliative ChT. Everolimus/exemestane in HR+ ABC is feasible in the clinic, with toxicity manageable under close surveillance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document