BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE REPERFUSION ERA

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. S6-S7
Author(s):  
N. Zamiri ◽  
H. Alraddadi ◽  
T. Adli ◽  
S. Jolly ◽  
C. Ainsworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

scholarly journals Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome—A meta-analysis of randomized trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 915-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurav Chatterjee ◽  
Debanik Chaudhuri ◽  
Rajesh Vedanthan ◽  
Valentin Fuster ◽  
Borja Ibanez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Low-dose of oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 229 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Obonska ◽  
Eliano Pio Navarese ◽  
Alexandra Lansky ◽  
Giuseppe Tarantini ◽  
Roberta Rossini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

PP23 Accuracy of emergency medical services (EMS) telephone triage in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for chest pain patients. A systematic review abstract

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. A10.2-A10
Author(s):  
Ahmed Alotaibi ◽  
Abdulrhman Alghamdi ◽  
Charles Reynard ◽  
Richard Body
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Telephone Triage ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Pain Patients

IntroductionChest pain is one of the most common reasons for ambulance callouts and presentation to Emergency Departments (EDs). Differentiating patients with serious conditions (e.g. acute coronary syndrome [ACS]) from the majority, who have self-limiting, non-cardiac conditions is extremely challenging. This causes over-triage and over-use of healthcare resources. We aimed to systematically review existing evidence on the accuracy of emergency telephone triage to detect ACS or life-threatening conditions associated with chest pain.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two independent investigators searched the Embase, Medline, and Cinahl databases for relevant papers. We included retrospective and prospective cohort studies written in English and investigating EMS telephone triage for chest pain patients linked with final diagnosis of ACS. Studies were summarised in a narrative format as the data were not suitable for meta-analysis.ResultIn total, 553 studies were identified from the literature search and cross-referencing. After excluding 550 studies, three were eligible for inclusion. Among those 3 studies, there are different prediction models developed by authors with variation in variables to detect ACS. The result showed that dispatch triage tools have good sensitivity to detect ACS and life-threatening conditions although they are used to triage sign and symptoms rather than diagnosing the patients. On the other hand, prediction models were built to detect ACS and life-threatening conditions and therefore it showed better sensitivity and NPV.ConclusionEMS dispatch systems accuracy for ACS and life-threatening conditions associated with chest pain is good. Since the dispatch tools were built to triage ambulance response priority based on sign and symptoms, this led to over triage among non-life-threatening chest pain patients. Over triage were slightly reduced by deriving prediction models and showed better sensitivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document