Clinical Impact of Valvular Heart Disease in Elderly Patients Admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the Elderly-ACS 2 Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1104-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Crimi ◽  
Claudio Montalto ◽  
Luca Angelo Ferri ◽  
Luigi Piatti ◽  
Irene Bossi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
M. R. Atabegashvili ◽  
E. V. Konstantinova ◽  
M. D. Muksinova ◽  
A. E. Udovichenko ◽  
A. P. Nesterov ◽  
...  

The number of elderly patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is constantly growing in general population. Accordantly, we have the growth of such patients in the group of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Aim.To compare clinical characteristics of the elderly patient (>75 years old) with and without DM.Material and methods. This retrospective study included 1133 ACS patients who were aged ≥75 years and admitted to the City Clinical Hospital №1 from 01.01.2015 to 31.12.2016. Median age was 80 years, 66% were women. We analyzed 4 patient subgroups: Group 1 – 105 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and DM, Group 2 – 254 STEMI patients without DM, Group 3 – 222 non-STEMI patients with DM and Group 4 – 552 non-STEMI patients without DM. We used Student’s t-test and c2 tests to find significant difference between pairs of groups.Results. Median age of patients in 4 groups was 80, 81, 81 and 80 years (p>0.05), age variance was 75-100 years. DM was found in 29% of all elderly patients with no difference between STEMI and non-STEMI groups. STEMI and non-STEMI patients with DM were more likely women. NonSTEMI patients with DM more often had hypertension, previous stroke, lower median Hb (121 vs 127 g/l; p<0.001). Angiography data demonstrated more often three-vessel disease (43% vs 29.7%) and less one-vessel disease (15% vs 25.6%; p<0.05) between groups 3 and 4. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 occurred in 74%, 73%, 77% and 74% in patients of 4 groups (p>0,05), but GFR<45 ml/min/1.73 m2 was more prevalent in patients with DM than without DM: 45%, 39%, 45%, 36% in 4 groups. Finally, mortality rates didn’t demonstrate significant difference between DM and non-DM patients with STEMI (10% vs 13%; p>0.05) and non-STEMI (7% vs 7%) groups.Conclusion. DM is associated with ACS approximately in one third of the elderly patients and is not associated with its type (STEMI or non-STEMI). In STEMI and non-STEMI patients the female sex and GFR level <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 were associated with DM. In non-STEMI group multi-vessel disease and presence of hypertension and previous stroke were associated with DM. We didn’t find any difference between mortality in elderly patients with and without DM. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rioboo ◽  
E Abuassi Alnakeeb ◽  
S Raposeiras Roubin ◽  
I Munoz Pousa ◽  
M Cespon Fernandez ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The clinical utility and validity of the PRECISE-DAPT bleeding risk score for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. We investigated the previous aspect in a contemporary population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at discharge. Methods Retrospectively, from 2010 to 2016, we studied 3,814 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of ACS. All patients were treated with in-hospital PCI and DAPT at discharge. Elderly was defined if patients aged ≥75 years. Patients were categorized into three risk strata according to their PRECISE-DAPT score (very low-low: <17 points, moderate: 18–24 points, and high risk: ≥25 points). We included the first bleeding event occurred during the first year after discharge. Bleeding events were defined according to the BARC classification system, and divided into two subgroups: BARC 2–5 and BARC 3–5. The ability to separate high bleeding risk patients from lower bleeding risk patients was checked by the cumulative incidence function curves and compared using the Fine-Gray test, thus adjusting for death (non-bleeding related) as a competing risk. Discrimination (C statistic) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) were used to test the predictive capacity of the score in pts aged ≥75 years and <75 years. Results 25.2% (n=961/3814) were ≥75 years old, 38.4% of them were women. DAPT duration was 11.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5–13.7) vs. 12.0 (RIQ 8.2–14.1) months in the elderly vs. younger; (p<0.001). 92.5% (n=889) of the elderly were at high risk of bleeding (PRECISE-DAPT≥25 points), compared to 21.3% (n=607) of the youngest. The incidence of BARC 2–5 and BARC 3–5 was 7.4% and 2.7% in the elderly compared to 5.1% and 1.4% among the younger patients (p<0.001). The figure shows the ability of the PRECISE-DAPT score at capturing the risk of BARC 2–5 bleeding (panel A and B), in both age groups. Using the cut-off point ≥25, the effect in the prediction of BARC 2–5 bleeding and BARC 3–5 did not differ significantly between the elderly and those <75 years: sHR = 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2–6.00) in the elderly vs. 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3–2.5) in the other group (p=0.99) and sHR = 3.3 (95% CI: 1.9–6.0) vs. 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9–6.7) (p=0.83), respectively. There were no significant differences between the elderly and those under 75 years in terms of statistical C values either for BARC 2–5 bleeding (0.60 vs. 0.58) or BARC 3–5 bleeding (0.64 vs. 0.67). The score performed well in term of calibration in both groups (all p-values >0.3). Conclusion Although the use of PRECISE-DAPT resulted in classifying the majority of elderly patients at high risk of bleeding and despite exhibiting modest discriminative power, it performed well at classifying patients according to their risk of 1-year out-of-hospital bleeding in both age groups. PRECISE-DAPT appears to identify the truly low risk patients among the elderly, as compared to the younger group.


Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (Suppl 5) ◽  
pp. A52.2-A52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lampson Fan ◽  
Asad Shabbir ◽  
Stewart Mclure ◽  
Jocelyn Lam ◽  
Mark Cassar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Shi Tai ◽  
Xuping Li ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Zhaowei Zhu ◽  
Liang Tang ◽  
...  

Background. The impact of sex on the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been suggested, but little is known about its impact on elderly patients with ACS. Methods. This study analyzed the impact of sex on in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of elderly (≥75 years of age) patients with ACS hospitalized in our department between January 2013 and December 2017. Results. A total of 711 patients were included: 273 (38.4%) women and 438 (61.6%) men. Their age ranged from 75 to 94 years, similar between women and men. Women had more comorbidities (hypertension (79.5% vs. 72.8%, p=0.050), diabetes mellitus (35.2% vs. 26.5%, p=0.014), and hyperuricemia (39.9% vs. 32.4%, p=0.042)) and had a higher prevalence of non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) (79.5% vs. 71.2%, p=0.014) than men. The prevalence of current smoking (56.5% vs. 5.4%, p<0.001), creatinine levels (124.4 ± 98.6 vs. 89.9 ± 54.1, p<0.001), and revascularization rate (39.7% vs. 30.0%, p=0.022) were higher, and troponin TnT and NT-proBNP tended to be higher in men than in women. The in-hospital mortality rate was similar (3.5% vs. 4.4%, p=0.693), but the 1-year mortality rate was lower in women than in men (14.7% vs. 21.7%, p=0.020). The multivariable analysis showed that female sex was a protective factor for 1-year mortality in all patients (OR = 0.565, 95% CI 0.351–0.908, p=0.018) and in patients with STEMI (OR = 0.416, 95% CI 0.184–0.940, p=0.035) after adjustment. Conclusions. Among the elderly patients with ACS, the 1-year mortality rate was lower in women than in men, which could be associated with comorbidities and ACS type.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kruchinova ◽  
E D Kosmachova ◽  
S A Raff

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the features of treatment and outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods The elderly group comprised 2385 (28.9%) patients ≥75 years of the 8249 patients enrolled in the KRACS registry. Results When comparing patients of different ages, it was shown that among the elderly, dyspnoea was the most common manifestation of ACS, 9% vs 4% (p=0.015), they were less often hospitalized in “invasive” hospitals - 36% vs 49% (p=0.003), At admission, they often had the class Killip ≥ II - 36% vs 17% (p<0.001), a high risk for the GRASE-68% vs 30% (p<0.001). In addition, in elderly patients significantly lowered levels of Hb and increased creatinine were detected more often. Drug treatment of elderly patients was characterized by less frequent use of ticagrelor - 3% vs 21% (p<0.001), LMWH or fondaparinux - 4% vs 12% (p=0.004). Thrombolytic therapy in STEMI in the elderly was more often streptokinase - 30% vs 18% (p=0.04), less often - tissue activator plasminogen - 2% vs 10% (p=0.03). The frequency of performing any invasive interventions for any type of ACS in elderly patients was significantly lower - 16.7% vs 46.3% (p<0.0001), and the incidence of fatal outcomes during hospitalization for any type of ACS was significantly higher - 16, 0% vs 6.1% (p<0.0001). When assessing the incidence of fatalities in different facilities, it was found that STEMI, patients ≥75 years old hospitalized in “invasive” hospitals died significantly less frequently than when they got into “non-invasive” hospitals - 15.6% vs 50.0% (p=0.013). At the same time, among patients <75 years hospital mortality in “invasive” and “non-invasive” hospitals was not significantly different - 14.7% vs 9.9% (p=0.50). There was also a clear trend towards a higher incidence of deaths among elderly patients who were left without PCI, compared with those who had been intervened. In patients <75 years, this trend was absent. Conclusion Thus, the results obtained indicate that elderly patients, with a higher risk and worse outcomes, receive treatment that is less consistent with the requirements of modern guidelines for the treatment of ACS. Important factors associated with better outcomes in elderly patients is their hospitalization in “invasive” hospitals and the implementation of PCI.


The Clinician ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. D. Ryzhkova ◽  
E. V. Kanareykina ◽  
M. R. Atabegashvili ◽  
E. V. Konstantinova ◽  
M. Yu. Gilyarov

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Over the past few decades, life expectancy has increased, which has led to an aging population in developed countries, so the average age of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has steadily increased in recent decades. The inclusion of elderly and senile patients in randomized clinical trials does not reflect the age-related association of these diseases. However, antithrombotic therapy and interventional treatment are the basis of treatment in patients with ACS of any age, including the elderly. For older patients, there may be a mismatch between chronological and biological age. The question of how close the treatment of elderly patients with ACS is to the level of current recommendations and whether it is possible to apply them unconditionally in this group of patients does not have a definite answer. Current recommendations and the underlying randomized clinical trials are focused on any one disease, whereas in the elderly in most cases multimorbid pathology occurs. In general, elderly patients with ACS should be treated using the same methods as younger patients, however, the presence of comorbid diseases in an elderly patient naturally increases the risk of complications, makes the patient’s prognosis heavier, significantly affects treatment tactics, limits the possibility of using conventional approaches when choosing a drug therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document