scholarly journals INFORMING FUTURE GUIDELINES AND POLICY FROM THE PATIENTS' PERSPECTIVE ON CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE REMOTE MONITORING: A MASTERS PROJECT FINAL RESULTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. S201
Author(s):  
D. Campbell ◽  
B. Glover ◽  
R. Parkash ◽  
R. Laforest ◽  
H. Abdollah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Patients Perspective

Cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring in a large cohort of patients and the need for planning

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-456
Author(s):  
Franco Zoppo ◽  
Antonio Lupo ◽  
Giacomo Mugnai ◽  
Francesca Zerbo
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Large Cohort ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Aim: The remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is standard of care. We describe an organizational and projection RM workload model. Methods: At the time of the analysis (2015), 3995 CIED patients were followed-up; 1582 (40.5%) with RM. All RM transmissions (Tx) have been gathered in five event types. Results: We received 10,406 Tx, classified as: 128 (1.2%) red alerts, 141 (1.3%) atrial fibrillation episodes, 1944 (18.6%) yellow alerts, 403 (3.9%) lost Tx (disconnected/noncompliant patients) and 7790 (75.0%) Tx ‘OK' (un-eventful Tx). At the time of 100% of remote CIED managed, we can expect a total of 25,990 Tx/year. Conclusion: We provide a descriptive analysis of remote monitoring management and workload estimation in a large cohort of CIED patients.

Variations in cardiac implantable electronic device surveillance and ancillary testing in the paediatric and congenital heart disease population: an international multi-centre survey from the Paediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Olen ◽  
Brynn E. Dechert ◽  
Anne Foster ◽  
Ronald J. Kanter ◽  
Michael J. Silka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Exercise Stress Test ◽  
Exercise Stress ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Device Implantation

Abstract Background: Expert guidance from scientific societies and regulatory agencies recommend a framework of principles for frequency of in-person evaluations and remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. However, there are limited data regarding adherence to recommendations among paediatric electrophysiologists, and there are no data regarding cardiac implantable electronic device-related ancillary testing. Methods: To assess current clinical practices for cardiac implantable electronic device in-person evaluation, remote monitoring, and cardiac implantable electronic device-related ancillary testing, the Paediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society members were surveyed. The main outcome measures were variations in frequency of in person evaluation, frequency of remote monitoring, and cardiac implantable electronic device-related ancillary testing. Results: All respondents performed in-person evaluation at least once a year, but <50% of respondents performed an in-person evaluation within 2 weeks of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Remote monitoring was performed every 3 months for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators by 71 and 75% respondents, respectively. Follow-up echocardiography was performed every 2–3 years by 53% respondents for patients with >50% ventricular pacing. Majority of respondents (75%) did not perform either an exercise stress test or ambulatory Holter monitoring or chest X-ray (65%) after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Conclusion: This survey identified significant practice variations in cardiac implantable electronic device in- person evaluation, remote monitoring, and ancillary testing practices among paediatric electrophysiologists. Cardiac implantable electronic device management may be optimised by development of a paediatric-specific guidelines for follow-up and ancillary testing.

False remote monitoring alerts from explanted cardiac implantable electronic device: How is this possible?

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 132-133
Author(s):  
Kyle M. Heath ◽  
Ellen Lyrtzis ◽  
Melissa E. Middeldorp ◽  
Prashanthan Sanders ◽  
Dennis H. Lau
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device

scholarly journals Improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into remote monitoring following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneet Mittal ◽  
Jonathan P. Piccini ◽  
Jeff Snell ◽  
Julie B. Prillinger ◽  
Nirav Dalal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Device Implantation

Organizational Models for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-497
Author(s):  
Carly Daley ◽  
Tammy Toscos ◽  
Tina Allmandinger ◽  
Ryan Ahmed ◽  
Shauna Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Monitoring ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Organizational Models
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document