Do firms' political connections depress the union wage effect? Evidence from China

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 183-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Song ◽  
Jidong Yang ◽  
Qijing Yang
ILR Review ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Christensen ◽  
Dennis Maki

This study assesses the wage effect of compulsory membership clauses in union contracts. Previous industry-level studies of union wage effects have used contract coverage as the measure of unionization, that is, the proportion of workers in an industry, both members and nonmembers of unions, who are covered by collective agreements. In the wage equation estimated here, union coverage is disaggregated into its membership and covered-nonmember components. Results for a sample of 54 three-digit manufacturing industries indicate that compulsory membership clauses do enable unions to negotiate significantly greater wage increases. Results from a sample of 21 two-digit industries, however, offer less clear-cut evidence of the wage gains to be had from compulsory union membership.


1981 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Christensen ◽  
Dennis Maki

ILR Review ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry T. Hirsch ◽  
Robert A. Connolly

This paper challenges the conclusion reached in recent studies that unions reduce profits exclusively in highly concentrated industries. From their review of previous studies and their analysis of 1977 data on 367 Fortune 500 firms, the authors conclude that there is no convincing evidence that concentration produces monopoly profits for unions to capture. Moreover, they find that the union wage effect is not greater in concentrated industries, as suggested by the hypothesis that unions capture concentration-related profits. Evidence is found suggesting that a firm's market share, its expenditures on research and development, and its protection from foreign competition provide more likely sources for union rents than does industry concentration.


Economica ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 61 (244) ◽  
pp. 435 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hatton ◽  
G. R. Boyer ◽  
R. E. Bailey

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Maki ◽  
Sandra Christensen

In this paper, the authors extend the literature on union wage effect in two ways. They use aggregate industry data in a simultaneous-equations model to provide an estimate for the union wage effect in Canada which recognizes the endogenity of union coverages. And they suggest a possible cause for the difference in results obtained for the U.S. by Ashenfelter and Johnson, on the one hand, and Kahn on the other.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIROMI HARA ◽  
DAIJI KAWAGUCHI
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
HIROMI HARA ◽  
DAIJI KAWAGUCHI
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document