scholarly journals Genetic algorithm for large-size multi-stage batch plant scheduling

2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1504-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaohua He ◽  
Chi-Wai Hui
Author(s):  
Игорь Савостин ◽  
Igor' Savostin ◽  
Андрей Трубаков ◽  
Andrey Trubakov

One of the difficult problems to solve has always been and still remains the problem of finding a path either in a graphic chart or a graphic maze of large size. The main problem is that traditional algorithms require a lot of time due to combinatorial complexity. At the same time, both classical algorithms based on the search of variants (such as Dijkstra's algorithm, A*, ARA*, D* lite), and stochastic algorithms (ant algorithm, genetic), alongside with algorithms based on morphology (wave) are not always able to achieve the goal. The article proposes a new modification of the path-finding algorithm, which is a hybrid of the following: the morphological operations on graphic chart approach and genetic algorithm having a useful property of elasticity in time. The experiments (both synthetic and real data) have shown the feasibility of the proposed idea and its comparison with the most commonly used algorithms of contemporaneity.


Author(s):  
Adrian Dietz ◽  
Catherine Azzaro Pantel ◽  
Luc Guy Pibouleau ◽  
Serge Domenech

This work deals with the multicriteria cost-environment design of multiproduct batch plants, where the design variables are the equipment item sizes as well as the operating conditions. The case study is a multiproduct batch plant for the production of four recombinant proteins. Given the important combinatorial aspect of the problem, the approach used consists in coupling a stochastic algorithm, indeed a Genetic Algorithm (GA) with a Discrete Event Simulator (DES). To take into account the conflicting situations that may be encountered at the earliest stage of batch plant design, i.e. compromise situations between cost and environmental consideration, a Multicriteria Genetic Algorithm (MUGA) was developed with a Pareto optimal ranking method. The results show how the methodology can be used to find a range of trade-off solutions for optimizing batch plant design.


Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berthold Ottens ◽  
Jens Götze ◽  
Ralf Schuster ◽  
Kurt Krenn ◽  
Christoph Hauzenberger ◽  
...  

Flood basalts of the Deccan Volcanic Province erupted between about 67.5 to 60.5 Ma ago and reached a thickness of up to 3500 m. The main part consists of compound and simple lava flows with a tholeiitic composition erupted within 500,000 years at about 65 Ma. Within the compound lava flows, vesicles and cavities are frequent. They are filled by secondary minerals partly of well development and large size. This study presents data on the secondary mineralization including detailed field descriptions, optical, cathodoluminescence and SEM microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, fluid inclusions, C and O isotope analyses, and Rb-Sr and K-Ar geochronology. The investigations indicate a multistage precipitation sequence with three main stages. During stage I clay minerals and subsurface filamentous fabrics (SFFs), of probably biogenic origin, formed after the lava flows cooled down near to the Earth’s surface. In stage II, first an assemblage of calcite (I) and zeolite (I) (including mordenite, heulandite, and stilbite) as well as plagioclase was overgrown by chalcedony, and finally a second calcite (II) and zeolite (II) generation developed by burial metamorphism by subsequent lava flows. Stage III is characterized by precipitation of a third calcite (III) generation together with powellite and apophyllite from late hydrothermal fluids. Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages of apophyllite indicate a large time span for stage III. Apophyllite formed within different time intervals from the Paleogene to the early Miocene even within individual lava flows at certain localities. From the Savda/Jalgaon quarry complex, ages cluster at 44–48 Ma and 25–28 Ma, whereas those from the Nashik area are 55–58 Ma and 21–23 Ma, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document