Liquid-wall mass transfer in three phase fluidized beds with cross-flow of electrolyte

2008 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.V. Ramesh ◽  
G.M.J. Raju ◽  
C. Bhaskara Sarma ◽  
R.V. Subba Raju
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluidized Beds ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Liquid Wall ◽  
Wall Mass

Oxygen mass transfer in three-phase fluidized beds working at large flow rates

1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Alvarez-Cuenca ◽  
C. G. J. Baker ◽  
M. A. Bergougnou ◽  
M. A. Nerenberg
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluidized Beds ◽  
Oxygen Mass Transfer ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Large Flow

scholarly journals Increasing Gas–Solids Mass Transfer in Fluidized Beds by Application of Confined Fluidization—A Feasibility Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Aronsson ◽  
David Pallarès ◽  
Magnus Rydén ◽  
Anders Lyngfelt
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluidized Bed ◽  
Fluidized Beds ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Active Role ◽  
High Density ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Olivine Sand ◽  
Bed Material ◽  
Utility Scale

Fluidized bed applications where the bed material plays an active role in chemical reactions, e.g. chemical looping combustion, have seen an increase in interest over the past decade. When these processes are to be scaled up to industrial or utility scale mass transfer between the gas and solids phases can become a limitation for conversion. Confined fluidized beds were conceptualized for other purposes in the 1960’s but are yet to be applied to these recent technologies. Here it is investigated if they can prove useful to increase mass transfer but also if they are feasible from other perspectives such as pressure drop increase and solids throughflow. Four spherical packing solids, 6.35–25.4 mm in diameter at two different densities, were tested. For mass transfer experiments the fluidizing air was humidified and the water adsorption rate onto silica gel particles acting as fluidizing solids was measured. Olivine sand was used in further experiments measuring segregation of solids and packing, and maximum vertical crossflow of solids. It was found that mass transfer increased by a factor of 1.9–3.8 with packing solids as compared to a non-packed reference. With high-density packing, fluidizing solids voidage inside the packing was found to be up to 58% higher than in a conventional fluidized bed. Low density packing material favoured its flotsam segregation and with it higher fluidization velocities yield better mixing between packing and fluidizing solids. Maximum vertical cross-flow was found to be significantly higher with low density packing that fluidized, than with stationary high-density packing. Conclusively, the prospect of using confined fluidized beds for improving mass transfer looks promising from both performance and practical standpoints.

scholarly journals Mass transfer in two- and three-phase fluidized beds.

1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. CHANG ◽  
Y. KANG ◽  
S. D. KIM
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluidized Beds ◽  
Three Phase

Wall mass transfer in liquid-fluidized beds

1967 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. King ◽  
J. W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluidized Beds ◽  
Wall Mass

scholarly journals Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in three-phase magnetic fluidized beds

2001 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Min Chen ◽  
Lii-Ping Leu
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluidized Beds ◽  
Three Phase
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document