Reporting of cause-specific treatment effects in cancer clinical trials with competing risks: A systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 920-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loren K. Mell ◽  
Steven K. Lau ◽  
Brent S. Rose ◽  
Jong-Hyeon Jeong
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer G Le-Rademacher ◽  
Ryan A Peterson ◽  
Terry M Therneau ◽  
Ben L Sanford ◽  
Richard M Stone ◽  
...  

Background/aims The goal of this article is to illustrate the utility of multi-state models in cancer clinical trials. Our specific aims are to describe multi-state models and how they differ from standard survival methods, to illustrate how multi-state models can facilitate deeper understanding of the treatment effect on multiple paths along the disease process that patients could experience in cancer clinical trials, to explain the differences between multi-state models and time-dependent Cox models, and to briefly describe available software to conduct such analyses. Methods Data from 717 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients who enrolled in the CALGB 10603 trial were used as an illustrative example. The current probability-in-state was estimated using the Aalen–Johansen estimator. The restricted mean time in state was calculated as the area under the probability-in-state curves. Cox-type regression was used to evaluate the effect of midostaurin on the various clinical paths. Simulation was conducted using a newly constructed shiny application. All analyses were performed using the R software. Results Multi-state model analyses of CALGB 10603 suggested that the overall improvement in survival with midostaurin seen in the primary analysis possibly resulted from a higher complete remission rate in combination with a lower risk of relapse and of death after complete remission in patients treated with midostaurin. Simulation results, in a three-state illness-death without recovery model, demonstrate that multi-state models and time-dependent Cox models evaluate treatment effects from different frameworks. Conclusion Multi-state models allow detailed evaluation of treatment effects in complex clinical trial settings where patients can experience multiple paths between study enrollment and the final outcome. Multi-state models can be used as a complementary tool to standard survival analyses to provide deeper insights to the effects of treatment in trial settings with complex disease process.


Author(s):  
Mina S. Sedrak ◽  
Rachel A. Freedman ◽  
Harvey J. Cohen ◽  
Hyman B. Muss ◽  
Aminah Jatoi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 2488-2505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il Do Ha ◽  
Nicholas J Christian ◽  
Jong-Hyeon Jeong ◽  
Junwoo Park ◽  
Youngjo Lee

Competing risks data often exist within a center in multi-center randomized clinical trials where the treatment effects or baseline risks may vary among centers. In this paper, we propose a subdistribution hazard regression model with multivariate frailty to investigate heterogeneity in treatment effects among centers from multi-center clinical trials. For inference, we develop a hierarchical likelihood (or h-likelihood) method, which obviates the need for an intractable integration over the frailty terms. We show that the profile likelihood function derived from the h-likelihood is identical to the partial likelihood, and hence it can be extended to the weighted partial likelihood for the subdistribution hazard frailty models. The proposed method is illustrated with a dataset from a multi-center clinical trial on breast cancer as well as with a simulation study. We also demonstrate how to present heterogeneity in treatment effects among centers by using a confidence interval for the frailty for each individual center and how to perform a statistical test for such heterogeneity using a restricted h-likelihood.


Cancer ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean G. Ford ◽  
Mollie W. Howerton ◽  
Gabriel Y. Lai ◽  
Tiffany L. Gary ◽  
Shari Bolen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 90-99
Author(s):  
David Riedl ◽  
Maria Rothmund ◽  
Anne-Sophie Darlington ◽  
Samantha Sodergren ◽  
Roman Crazzolara ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Diego Enrico ◽  
Federico Waisberg ◽  
Jeannette Burton ◽  
Pablo Mandó ◽  
Matías Chacón

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document