scholarly journals Activation of Pulmonary Arterial Endothelium in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Induced Pulmonary Hypertension Similar to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S7
Author(s):  
Jason N. Salamon ◽  
Jeremy Mazurek ◽  
Ronald Zolty
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial ◽  
Arterial Endothelium

scholarly journals Right Ventricular and Right Atrial Function Are Less Compromised in Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comparison With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Similar Pressure Overload

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie van Wezenbeek ◽  
Azar Kianzad ◽  
Arno van de Bovenkamp ◽  
Jeroen Wessels ◽  
Sophia A. Mouratoglou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Pressure Overload ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent disorder for which no effective treatment yet exists. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right atrial (RA) and ventricular (RV) dysfunction are frequently observed. The question remains whether the PH with the associated RV/RA dysfunction in HFpEF are markers of disease severity. Methods: To obtain insight in the relative importance of pressure-overload and left-to-right interaction, we compared RA and RV function in 3 groups: 1. HFpEF (n=13); 2. HFpEF-PH (n=33), and; 3. pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) matched to pulmonary artery pressures of HFpEF-PH (PH limited to mPAP ≥30 and ≤50 mmHg) (n=47). Patients underwent right heart catheterization and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Results: The right ventricle in HFpEF-PH was less dilated and hypertrophied than in PAH. In addition, RV ejection fraction was more preserved (HFpEF-PH: 52±11 versus PAH: 36±12%). RV filling patterns differed: vena cava backflow during RA contraction was observed in PAH only. In HFpEF-PH, RA pressure was elevated throughout the cardiac cycle (HFpEF-PH: 10 [8–14] versus PAH: 7 [5–10] mm Hg), while RA volume was smaller, reflecting excessive RA stiffness (HFpEF-PH: 0.14 [0.10–0.17] versus PAH: 0.08 [0.06–0.11] mm Hg/mL). RA stiffness was associated with an increased eccentricity index (HFpEF-PH: 1.3±0.2 versus PAH: 1.2±0.1) and interatrial pressure gradient (9 [5 to 12] versus 2 [−2 to 5] mm Hg). Conclusions: RV/RA function was less compromised in HFpEF-PH than in PAH, despite similar pressure-overload. Increased RA pressure and stiffness in HFpEF-PH were explained by left atrial/RA-interaction. Therefore, our results indicate that increased RA pressure is not a sign of overt RV failure but rather a reflection of HFpEF-severity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document