scholarly journals A comparison between power spectral density and network metrics: An EEG study

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 101760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Demuru ◽  
Simone Maurizio La Cava ◽  
Sara Maria Pani ◽  
Matteo Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Power Spectral Density ◽  
Power Spectral ◽  
Network Metrics

scholarly journals A comparison between power spectral density and network metrics: an EEG study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Demuru ◽  
Simone Maurizio La Cava ◽  
Sara Maria Pani ◽  
Matteo Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Power Spectral Density ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Clustering Coefficient ◽  
Volume Conduction ◽  
Functional Correlation ◽  
Power Spectral ◽  
Eeg Data ◽  
Similar Information ◽  
Network Metrics

AbstractPower spectral density (PSD) and network analysis performed on functional correlation (FC) patterns represent two common approaches used to characterize Electroencephalographic (EEG) data. Despite the two approaches are widely used, their possible association may need more attention. To investigate this question, we performed a comparison between PSD and some widely used nodal network metrics (namely strength, clustering coefficient and betweenness centrality), using two different publicly available resting-state EEG datasets, both at scalp and source levels, employing four different FC methods (PLV, PLI, AEC and AECC). Here we show that the two approaches may provide similar information and that their correlation depends on the method used to estimate FC. In particular, our results show a strong correlation between PSD and nodal network metrics derived from FC methods (PLV and AEC) that do not limit the effects of volume conduction/signal leakage. The correlations are less relevant for more conservative FC methods (AECC). These findings suggest that the results derived from the two different approaches may be not independent and should not be treated as distinct analyses. We conclude that it may represent good practice to report the findings from the two approaches in conjunction to have a more comprehensive view of the results.

Fuzzy Modeling of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Power Spectral Density Systems

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Montasser Tahat ◽  
Hussien Al-Wedyan ◽  
Kudret Demirli ◽  
Saad Mutasher
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Power Spectral Density ◽  
Fuzzy Modeling ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Power Spectral

scholarly journals Noise power spectral density scaled SNR response estimation with restricted range search for sound source localisation using unmanned aerial vehicles

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Yen ◽  
Yusuke Hioka
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Power Spectral Density ◽  
Sound Source ◽  
Processing Algorithm ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Time Frequency ◽  
Distance Error ◽  
Rotor Noise ◽  
Power Spectral

Abstract A method to locate sound sources using an audio recording system mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is proposed. The method introduces extension algorithms to apply on top of a baseline approach, which performs localisation by estimating the peak signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) response in the time-frequency and angular spectra with the time difference of arrival information. The proposed extensions include a noise reduction and a post-processing algorithm to address the challenges in a UAV setting. The noise reduction algorithm reduces influences of UAV rotor noise on localisation performance, by scaling the SNR response using power spectral density of the UAV rotor noise, estimated using a denoising autoencoder. For the source tracking problem, an angular spectral range restricted peak search and link post-processing algorithm is also proposed to filter out incorrect location estimates along the localisation path. Experimental results show the proposed extensions yielded improvements in locating the target sound source correctly, with a 0.0064–0.175 decrease in mean haversine distance error across various UAV operating scenarios. The proposed method also shows a reduction in unexpected location estimations, with a 0.0037–0.185 decrease in the 0.75 quartile haversine distance error.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document