The anterior contralateral response improves performance in a single trial auditory oddball BMI

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 74-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaomiao Guo ◽  
Guizhi Xu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Matthew Masters ◽  
Griffin Milsap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Trial ◽  
Auditory Oddball ◽  
Contralateral Response

scholarly journals Single-trial discrimination for integrating simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Identifying cortical areas contributing to trial-to-trial variability in the auditory oddball task

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin I. Goldman ◽  
Cheng-Yu Wei ◽  
Marios G. Philiastides ◽  
Adam D. Gerson ◽  
David Friedman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Trial ◽  
Auditory Oddball ◽  
Cortical Areas ◽  
Oddball Task ◽  
Auditory Oddball Task

The Involuntary Capture of Attention by Sound

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice B. R. Parmentier ◽  
Pilar Andrés
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Mismatch Negativity ◽  
Visual Task ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Auditory Oddball ◽  
Current Trial ◽  
Electrophysiological Responses ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Task Sets

The presentation of auditory oddball stimuli (novels) among otherwise repeated sounds (standards) triggers a well-identified chain of electrophysiological responses: The detection of acoustic change (mismatch negativity), the involuntary orientation of attention to (P3a) and its reorientation from the novel. Behaviorally, novels reduce performance in an unrelated visual task (novelty distraction). Past studies of the cross-modal capture of attention by acoustic novelty have typically discarded from their analysis the data from the standard trials immediately following a novel, despite some evidence in mono-modal oddball tasks of distraction extending beyond the presentation of deviants/novels (postnovelty distraction). The present study measured novelty and postnovelty distraction and examined the hypothesis that both types of distraction may be underpinned by common frontally-related processes by comparing young and older adults. Our data establish that novels delayed responses not only on the current trial and but also on the subsequent standard trial. Both of these effects increased with age. We argue that both types of distraction relate to the reconfiguration of task-sets and discuss this contention in relation to recent electrophysiological studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document